Spring migration ecology of the mid-continent sandhill crane population with an emphasis on use of the Central Platte River Valley, Nebraska Ecologia de la Migracion de Primavera de la Poblacion Centro-Continental de la Grulla Canadiense con Enfasis en el Uso del Valle del Central Platte River en Nebraska Écologie de la Migration Printaninière de la Population Mi-Continentale des Grues du Canada avec un Accent sur L'utilisation de la Vallée Centrale de la Rivière Platte, Nebraska Экология Весенней Миграции Средне-Континентальной Популяции Канадского Журавля с Акцентом на Транзитной Остановке в Центральной Долине Реки Платт в Небраске

IF 4.3 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Gary L. Krapu, David A. Brandt, Paul J. Kinzel, Aaron T. Pearse
{"title":"Spring migration ecology of the mid-continent sandhill crane population with an emphasis on use of the Central Platte River Valley, Nebraska\n Ecologia de la Migracion de Primavera de la Poblacion Centro-Continental de la Grulla Canadiense con Enfasis en el Uso del Valle del Central Platte River en Nebraska\n Écologie de la Migration Printaninière de la Population Mi-Continentale des Grues du Canada avec un Accent sur L'utilisation de la Vallée Centrale de la Rivière Platte, Nebraska\n Экология Весенней Миграции Средне-Континентальной Популяции Канадского Журавля с Акцентом на Транзитной Остановке в Центральной Долине Реки Платт в Небраске","authors":"Gary L. Krapu,&nbsp;David A. Brandt,&nbsp;Paul J. Kinzel,&nbsp;Aaron T. Pearse","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>We conducted a 10-year study (1998–2007) of the Mid-Continent Population (MCP) of sandhill cranes (<i>Grus canadensis</i>) to identify spring-migration corridors, locations of major stopovers, and migration chronology by crane breeding affiliation (western Alaska–Siberia [WA–S], northern Canada–Nunavut [NC–N], west-central Canada–Alaska [WC–A], and east-central Canada–Minnesota [EC–M]). In the Central Platte River Valley (CPRV) of Nebraska, we evaluated factors influencing staging chronology, food habits, fat storage, and habitat use of sandhill cranes. We compared our findings to results from the Platte River Ecology Study conducted during 1978–1980. We determined spring migration corridors used by the breeding affiliations (designated subpopulations for management purposes) by monitoring 169 cranes marked with platform transmitter terminals (PTTs). We also marked and monitored 456 cranes in the CPRV with very high frequency (VHF) transmitters to evaluate length and pattern of stay, habitat use, and movements. An estimated 42% and 58% of cranes staging in the CPRV were greater sandhill cranes (<i>G. c. tabida</i>) and lesser sandhill cranes (<i>G. c. canadensis</i>), and they stayed for an average of 20 and 25 days (2000–2007), respectively. Cranes from the WA–S, NC–N, WC–A, and EC–M affiliations spent an average of 72, 77, 52, and 53 days, respectively, in spring migration of which 28, 23, 24, and 18 days occurred in the CPRV. The majority of the WA–S subpopulation settled in the CPRV apparently because of inadequate habitat to support more birds upstream, although WA–S cranes accounted for &gt;90% of birds staging in the North Platte River Valley. Crane staging duration in the CPRV was negatively correlated with arrival dates; 92% of cranes stayed &gt;7 days. A program of annual mechanical removal of mature stands of woody growth and seedlings that began in the early 1980s primarily in the main channel of the Platte River has allowed distribution of crane roosts to remain relatively stable over the past 2 decades. Most cranes returned to nocturnal roost sites used in previous years. Corn residues dominated the diet of sandhill cranes in the CPRV, as in the 1970s, despite a marked decline in standing crop of corn residues. Only 14% (10 of 74) of PTT-marked migrant cranes stayed at stopovers for ≥5 days before arriving in the CPRV, which limited the contribution of sites south of the CPRV for fat accumulation needed for migration and reproduction. Body masses of cranes (after adjusting for body size [an index of fat]) at arrival in the CPRV varied widely among years (1998–2006), indicating the importance of maintaining productive habitats on the wintering grounds to condition cranes for migration and reproduction. Average rates of fat gain by adult females while in the CPRV remained similar from 1978–1979 to 1998–1999 but declined among males. Distances cranes flew to feeding grounds in the CPRV increased as the percentage of cropland planted to soybeans increased and as density of cranes on nocturnal roosts increased. These results suggest that as habitats of limited or no value to cranes increase on the landscape, more flight time and higher maintenance costs may reduce fat storage. An estimated 40% of diurnal use occurred north of Interstate 80 (I-80) where ≤5% of lands dedicated to crane conservation are located. Seventy-four and 40% of PTT-marked EC–M and WC–A cranes had spring migrations that included staging in eastern South Dakota for an average of 11 and 10 days, respectively. Cranes of the NC–N, WA–S, and WC–A subpopulations staged an average of 25, 17, and 12 days in central and western Saskatchewan/eastern Alberta. Females in these affiliations increased their fat reserves after leaving Nebraska by an estimated 450, 451, and 452 g, respectively, underscoring the key role of these staging areas in preparing the 3 subpopulations for reproduction. After departing Nebraska, MCP cranes roosted primarily in basin wetlands. Most of these wetlands are in private ownership and lack adequate protection, emphasizing the need for effective laws and policies to ensure their long-term protection. The continued success of the current management goal of maintaining the MCP at approximately its current size and providing diverse recreational opportunities over a wide area of midcontinent and western North America is predicated on the ability of MCP cranes to continue to store large fat reserves in the CPRV in advance of breeding. For the CPRV to remain a key fat storage site, active channel maintenance (e.g., clearing of woody vegetation) likely will need to continue, along with establishing minimum stream flows. These actions would help ensure nocturnal roosting habitat remains sufficiently dispersed to provide cranes with daily intake of high-energy food adequate for major fat storage and limit risk of high mortality from storms and disease. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1013","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.1013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

We conducted a 10-year study (1998–2007) of the Mid-Continent Population (MCP) of sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) to identify spring-migration corridors, locations of major stopovers, and migration chronology by crane breeding affiliation (western Alaska–Siberia [WA–S], northern Canada–Nunavut [NC–N], west-central Canada–Alaska [WC–A], and east-central Canada–Minnesota [EC–M]). In the Central Platte River Valley (CPRV) of Nebraska, we evaluated factors influencing staging chronology, food habits, fat storage, and habitat use of sandhill cranes. We compared our findings to results from the Platte River Ecology Study conducted during 1978–1980. We determined spring migration corridors used by the breeding affiliations (designated subpopulations for management purposes) by monitoring 169 cranes marked with platform transmitter terminals (PTTs). We also marked and monitored 456 cranes in the CPRV with very high frequency (VHF) transmitters to evaluate length and pattern of stay, habitat use, and movements. An estimated 42% and 58% of cranes staging in the CPRV were greater sandhill cranes (G. c. tabida) and lesser sandhill cranes (G. c. canadensis), and they stayed for an average of 20 and 25 days (2000–2007), respectively. Cranes from the WA–S, NC–N, WC–A, and EC–M affiliations spent an average of 72, 77, 52, and 53 days, respectively, in spring migration of which 28, 23, 24, and 18 days occurred in the CPRV. The majority of the WA–S subpopulation settled in the CPRV apparently because of inadequate habitat to support more birds upstream, although WA–S cranes accounted for >90% of birds staging in the North Platte River Valley. Crane staging duration in the CPRV was negatively correlated with arrival dates; 92% of cranes stayed >7 days. A program of annual mechanical removal of mature stands of woody growth and seedlings that began in the early 1980s primarily in the main channel of the Platte River has allowed distribution of crane roosts to remain relatively stable over the past 2 decades. Most cranes returned to nocturnal roost sites used in previous years. Corn residues dominated the diet of sandhill cranes in the CPRV, as in the 1970s, despite a marked decline in standing crop of corn residues. Only 14% (10 of 74) of PTT-marked migrant cranes stayed at stopovers for ≥5 days before arriving in the CPRV, which limited the contribution of sites south of the CPRV for fat accumulation needed for migration and reproduction. Body masses of cranes (after adjusting for body size [an index of fat]) at arrival in the CPRV varied widely among years (1998–2006), indicating the importance of maintaining productive habitats on the wintering grounds to condition cranes for migration and reproduction. Average rates of fat gain by adult females while in the CPRV remained similar from 1978–1979 to 1998–1999 but declined among males. Distances cranes flew to feeding grounds in the CPRV increased as the percentage of cropland planted to soybeans increased and as density of cranes on nocturnal roosts increased. These results suggest that as habitats of limited or no value to cranes increase on the landscape, more flight time and higher maintenance costs may reduce fat storage. An estimated 40% of diurnal use occurred north of Interstate 80 (I-80) where ≤5% of lands dedicated to crane conservation are located. Seventy-four and 40% of PTT-marked EC–M and WC–A cranes had spring migrations that included staging in eastern South Dakota for an average of 11 and 10 days, respectively. Cranes of the NC–N, WA–S, and WC–A subpopulations staged an average of 25, 17, and 12 days in central and western Saskatchewan/eastern Alberta. Females in these affiliations increased their fat reserves after leaving Nebraska by an estimated 450, 451, and 452 g, respectively, underscoring the key role of these staging areas in preparing the 3 subpopulations for reproduction. After departing Nebraska, MCP cranes roosted primarily in basin wetlands. Most of these wetlands are in private ownership and lack adequate protection, emphasizing the need for effective laws and policies to ensure their long-term protection. The continued success of the current management goal of maintaining the MCP at approximately its current size and providing diverse recreational opportunities over a wide area of midcontinent and western North America is predicated on the ability of MCP cranes to continue to store large fat reserves in the CPRV in advance of breeding. For the CPRV to remain a key fat storage site, active channel maintenance (e.g., clearing of woody vegetation) likely will need to continue, along with establishing minimum stream flows. These actions would help ensure nocturnal roosting habitat remains sufficiently dispersed to provide cranes with daily intake of high-energy food adequate for major fat storage and limit risk of high mortality from storms and disease. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

中大陆沙山鹤种群的春季迁徙生态,重点是内布拉斯加州中部普拉特河谷的利用,加拿大中部大陆格鲁拉的中大陆迁徙生态内布拉斯加州
本研究对加拿大中部大陆沙丘鹤(Grus canadensis)进行了为期10年(1998-2007)的研究,通过鹤的繁殖关系(阿拉斯加西部-西伯利亚[WA-S]、加拿大北部-努纳武特[NC-N]、加拿大中西部-阿拉斯加[WC-A]和加拿大中东部-明尼苏达州[EC-M])确定了春季迁徙通道、主要中途停留地点和迁徙年代史。在内布拉斯加州的中央普拉特河谷(CPRV),我们评估了沙丘鹤的分期年代学、食物习惯、脂肪储存和栖息地利用的影响因素。我们将我们的发现与1978-1980年间进行的普拉特河生态研究的结果进行了比较。我们通过监测169只带有平台发射终端(PTTs)的鹤,确定了繁殖团体使用的春季迁徙通道(为管理目的而指定的亚种群)。我们还用甚高频(VHF)发射机对CPRV中的456只起重机进行了标记和监测,以评估其停留的时间和模式、栖息地使用和运动。在CPRV中,估计42%和58%的鹤是大沙丘鹤(G. c. tabida)和小沙丘鹤(G. c. canadensis),它们的平均停留时间分别为20天和25天(2000-2007年)。WA-S、NC-N、WC-A和EC-M群鹤的春季迁徙平均时间分别为72、77、52和53天,其中CPRV群鹤的春季迁徙平均时间为28、23、24和18天。尽管WA-S鹤在北普拉特河谷占鸟类总数的90%,但大部分WA-S亚群在CPRV定居显然是因为栖息地不足,无法支持更多的上游鸟类。在CPRV中,鹤的分期时间与到达时间呈负相关;92%的起重机停留7天。从20世纪80年代初开始,主要在普拉特河主河道开展了一项每年机械清除成熟林木和幼苗的计划,使鹤的栖息地分布在过去的20年里保持相对稳定。大多数鹤回到前几年的夜间栖息地点。与20世纪70年代一样,玉米残留物在CPRV中主导了沙丘鹤的饮食,尽管玉米残留物的直立作物显著减少。只有14%(74只中的10只)的ptt标记的迁徙鹤在到达CPRV之前停留≥5天,这限制了CPRV以南的站点对迁徙和繁殖所需脂肪积累的贡献。1998-2006年,到达CPRV的鹤的体重(在调整体型[脂肪指数]后)在不同年份之间变化很大,这表明在越冬地维持生产栖息地对鹤的迁徙和繁殖有重要意义。从1978-1979年到1998-1999年,CPRV中成年女性的平均增脂率保持相似,但男性的增脂率有所下降。在CPRV中,随着种植大豆的农田比例的增加和夜间栖息的鹤的密度的增加,鹤飞到取食地的距离增加。这些结果表明,随着景观中对鹤的价值有限或没有价值的栖息地的增加,更多的飞行时间和更高的维护成本可能会减少脂肪储存。据估计,每天有40%的使用发生在80号州际公路(I-80)以北,那里有不到5%的土地专门用于起重机保护。74%和40%的ptt标记的EC-M和WC-A起重机进行春季迁徙,包括在南达科他州东部平均分别停留11天和10天。NC-N、WA-S和WC-A亚群的鹤在萨斯喀彻温省中部和西部/阿尔伯塔省东部的平均生存期分别为25、17和12天。在离开内布拉斯加州后,这些群体中的雌性分别增加了450克、451克和452克的脂肪储备,强调了这些暂存区在为3个亚种群的繁殖做准备方面的关键作用。离开内布拉斯加州后,MCP鹤主要栖息在盆地湿地。这些湿地大多为私人所有,缺乏足够的保护,强调需要有效的法律和政策来确保它们得到长期保护。目前的管理目标是将MCP维持在目前的规模,并在北美大陆中部和西部的广大地区提供多样化的娱乐机会,这一目标的持续成功取决于MCP起重机在繁殖前继续在CPRV中储存大量脂肪的能力。为了使CPRV保持一个关键的脂肪储存地点,可能需要继续进行积极的通道维护(例如,清除木本植被),同时建立最小流量。这些行动将有助于确保夜间栖息的栖息地保持足够分散,为鹤提供每日摄入的高能量食物,以储存主要脂肪,并限制风暴和疾病造成的高死亡率。2014年出版。这篇文章是关于美国的 政府工作,在美国属于公有领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Monographs
Wildlife Monographs 生物-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wildlife Monographs supplements The Journal of Wildlife Management with focused investigations in the area of the management and conservation of wildlife. Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) CAB Abstracts® (CABI) Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database (ProQuest) Global Health (CABI) Grasslands & Forage Abstracts (CABI) Helminthological Abstracts (CABI) Natural Science Collection (ProQuest) Poultry Abstracts (CABI) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-543 Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts (CABI) Veterinary Bulletin (CABI)
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信