EFFECTS OF SUMMER-AUTUMN NUTRITION AND PARTURITION DATE ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF ELK

IF 4.3 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
JOHN G. COOK, BRUCE K. JOHNSON, RACHEL C. COOK, ROBERT A. RIGGS, TIM DELCURTO, LARRY D. BRYANT, LARRY L. IRWIN
{"title":"EFFECTS OF SUMMER-AUTUMN NUTRITION AND PARTURITION DATE ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF ELK","authors":"JOHN G. COOK,&nbsp;BRUCE K. JOHNSON,&nbsp;RACHEL C. COOK,&nbsp;ROBERT A. RIGGS,&nbsp;TIM DELCURTO,&nbsp;LARRY D. BRYANT,&nbsp;LARRY L. IRWIN","doi":"10.2193/0084-0173(2004)155[1:EOSNAP]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract: </b> Recent declines in numbers and juvenile recruitment in many elk (<i>Cervus elaphus</i>) herds in the western U.S. has sparked interest in factors that may cause these declines. Inadequate nutrition or delayed parturition, the latter of which may be caused by inadequate numbers of mature bulls (i.e., highly skewed sex ratios), may have separate or synergistic effects on population dynamics and productivity. We evaluated the implications of late parturition and summer-autumn nutrition on reproduction and survival of Rocky Mountain elk (<i>C. e. nelsoni</i>) using a captive herd of 57 cow elk.</p><p>We induced early (Sep) and late breeding (Oct) and 3 levels of summer-autumn nutrition on the cows. Food was offered ad libitum at 3 levels of digestible energy (DE): high = 2.9-3.0 kcal of DE/g of diets, medium = 2.6-3.0 kcal/g, and low = 2.3-3.0 kcal/g. Within these ranges, DE content was gradually reduced from late June through early November to mimic seasonal changes in the wild. During summer and autumn, we measured calf growth; body mass, nutritional condition, and breeding dynamics of cows; and growth and pregnancy of yearlings. We also measured carry-over (i.e., time-lag) responses including over-winter calf and cow survival and parturition date and birth mass, as functions of previous summer-autumn nutrition and previous parturition date. Between autumn 1995 and spring 1998, we conducted 2 years of parturition-date, summer-autumn nutrition experiments, 2 winters of calf survival experiments, and 1 winter of cow survival experiments.</p><p>Early birth provided calves with more time to grow before onset of winter. This “head-start” advantage was maintained through late autumn, but its magnitude was diluted in some instances due to faster growth of some late-born calves. Body mass, body fat, and timing and probability of conception by cows in autumn were little influenced by parturition date the previous spring.</p><p>Summer-autumn nutrition significantly affected calves and their mothers. Growth of calves in the low and medium nutrition groups ceased by mid-September and late October. By December, calves in the high nutrition group were 40% and 70% heavier than calves in the medium and low groups, respectively. Cows in the high nutrition group accumulated about 75% and 300% more fat than cows in the medium and low groups by mid-October. Eighty percent of cows in the low nutrition group failed to conceive, and those in the medium group bred 10–14 days later than cows in the high group. Summer-autumn nutrition of calves influenced their probability of becoming pregnant as yearlings. Probability of pregnancy approached 100% for those yearlings that had high summerautumn nutrition as calves and yearlings, despite near starvation their first winter of life.</p><p>Winter survival of calves was related to their size at the onset of winter. Smaller calves lost more body mass daily than did large calves, and thus they survived fewer days through winter. Summer-autumn nutrition largely determined calf body size at the start of winter and, consequently, determined the proportion of winter survived. Survival of cows over winter was as related to body fat at the onset of winter as it was to nutrition during winter.</p><p>Carry-over effects of summer-autumn nutrition and parturition date on birth characteristics the following spring were minor. We detected no significant carry-over effect of summer-autumn nutrition or autumn condition on birth mass, although reduced condition in autumn delayed subsequent parturition date. Extent of body fat depletion in cows during the winter-survival experiments in 1998 accounted for 45% of the variation in parturition date. Ninety percent depletion delayed parturition an average of 34 days.</p><p>Delayed parturition, of a magnitude expected due to highly skewed sex ratios (3 weeks under extreme conditions), probably has only a weak influence on vital rates of free-ranging elk. In contrast, fat accretion and probability of pregnancy of cows, and growth and overwinter survival of calves, were sensitive to small (10–20%) differences in DE content of food. Digestible energy levels of our 2 lower nutrition levels reflect DE ranges reported for large ungulate herds during summer and autumn in western North America. Thus, our data suggest that limiting effects of summer-autumn nutrition on populations may be greater than often assumed, perhaps greater than those during winter in some ecosystems, and consequently indicate a need for greater understanding of nutrition's influence on population dynamics and how this influence varies across space and time. To enhance future research, we present animal- and vegetation-based guidelines for evaluating nutritional influences on elk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":"155 1","pages":"1-61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2193/0084-0173(2004)155[1:EOSNAP]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"375","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2193/0084-0173%282004%29155%5B1%3AEOSNAP%5D2.0.CO%3B2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 375

Abstract

Abstract: Recent declines in numbers and juvenile recruitment in many elk (Cervus elaphus) herds in the western U.S. has sparked interest in factors that may cause these declines. Inadequate nutrition or delayed parturition, the latter of which may be caused by inadequate numbers of mature bulls (i.e., highly skewed sex ratios), may have separate or synergistic effects on population dynamics and productivity. We evaluated the implications of late parturition and summer-autumn nutrition on reproduction and survival of Rocky Mountain elk (C. e. nelsoni) using a captive herd of 57 cow elk.

We induced early (Sep) and late breeding (Oct) and 3 levels of summer-autumn nutrition on the cows. Food was offered ad libitum at 3 levels of digestible energy (DE): high = 2.9-3.0 kcal of DE/g of diets, medium = 2.6-3.0 kcal/g, and low = 2.3-3.0 kcal/g. Within these ranges, DE content was gradually reduced from late June through early November to mimic seasonal changes in the wild. During summer and autumn, we measured calf growth; body mass, nutritional condition, and breeding dynamics of cows; and growth and pregnancy of yearlings. We also measured carry-over (i.e., time-lag) responses including over-winter calf and cow survival and parturition date and birth mass, as functions of previous summer-autumn nutrition and previous parturition date. Between autumn 1995 and spring 1998, we conducted 2 years of parturition-date, summer-autumn nutrition experiments, 2 winters of calf survival experiments, and 1 winter of cow survival experiments.

Early birth provided calves with more time to grow before onset of winter. This “head-start” advantage was maintained through late autumn, but its magnitude was diluted in some instances due to faster growth of some late-born calves. Body mass, body fat, and timing and probability of conception by cows in autumn were little influenced by parturition date the previous spring.

Summer-autumn nutrition significantly affected calves and their mothers. Growth of calves in the low and medium nutrition groups ceased by mid-September and late October. By December, calves in the high nutrition group were 40% and 70% heavier than calves in the medium and low groups, respectively. Cows in the high nutrition group accumulated about 75% and 300% more fat than cows in the medium and low groups by mid-October. Eighty percent of cows in the low nutrition group failed to conceive, and those in the medium group bred 10–14 days later than cows in the high group. Summer-autumn nutrition of calves influenced their probability of becoming pregnant as yearlings. Probability of pregnancy approached 100% for those yearlings that had high summerautumn nutrition as calves and yearlings, despite near starvation their first winter of life.

Winter survival of calves was related to their size at the onset of winter. Smaller calves lost more body mass daily than did large calves, and thus they survived fewer days through winter. Summer-autumn nutrition largely determined calf body size at the start of winter and, consequently, determined the proportion of winter survived. Survival of cows over winter was as related to body fat at the onset of winter as it was to nutrition during winter.

Carry-over effects of summer-autumn nutrition and parturition date on birth characteristics the following spring were minor. We detected no significant carry-over effect of summer-autumn nutrition or autumn condition on birth mass, although reduced condition in autumn delayed subsequent parturition date. Extent of body fat depletion in cows during the winter-survival experiments in 1998 accounted for 45% of the variation in parturition date. Ninety percent depletion delayed parturition an average of 34 days.

Delayed parturition, of a magnitude expected due to highly skewed sex ratios (3 weeks under extreme conditions), probably has only a weak influence on vital rates of free-ranging elk. In contrast, fat accretion and probability of pregnancy of cows, and growth and overwinter survival of calves, were sensitive to small (10–20%) differences in DE content of food. Digestible energy levels of our 2 lower nutrition levels reflect DE ranges reported for large ungulate herds during summer and autumn in western North America. Thus, our data suggest that limiting effects of summer-autumn nutrition on populations may be greater than often assumed, perhaps greater than those during winter in some ecosystems, and consequently indicate a need for greater understanding of nutrition's influence on population dynamics and how this influence varies across space and time. To enhance future research, we present animal- and vegetation-based guidelines for evaluating nutritional influences on elk populations.

夏秋营养和分娩日期对麋鹿繁殖和存活的影响
摘要:近年来,美国西部许多麋鹿(Cervus elaphus)种群数量和幼崽招募的下降引发了人们对导致这些下降的因素的兴趣。营养不足或分娩延迟,后者可能是由于成年公牛数量不足(即性别比例高度倾斜)造成的,可能对种群动态和生产力产生单独或协同影响。本文以57头圈养麋鹿为研究对象,研究了晚产和夏秋营养对落基山麋鹿(C. e. nelsoni)繁殖和存活的影响。对奶牛进行早育(9月)、晚育(10月)和夏秋3个营养水平的诱导。按消化能(DE) 3个水平随意饲喂,高消化能水平= 2.9 ~ 3.0 kcal/g,中消化能水平= 2.6 ~ 3.0 kcal/g,低消化能水平= 2.3 ~ 3.0 kcal/g。在这些范围内,DE含量从6月下旬到11月初逐渐减少,以模拟野外的季节变化。在夏季和秋季,我们测量了小牛的生长;奶牛的体重、营养状况和繁殖动态;还有一岁的幼崽的成长和怀孕。我们还测量了结转(即时滞)反应,包括越冬小牛和母牛的存活率、分娩日期和出生质量,作为先前夏秋营养和先前分娩日期的函数。1995年秋至1998年春,进行了2年的产仔期、夏秋营养试验、2个冬季犊牛生存试验和1个冬季奶牛生存试验。早出生为小牛在冬天来临前提供了更多的时间来生长。这种“领先”优势一直保持到深秋,但在某些情况下,由于一些晚出生的小牛生长更快,其重要性被稀释了。秋季奶牛的体质量、体脂、受孕时间和概率受前一个春季分娩日期的影响不大。夏秋两季的营养状况对幼崽和母崽影响显著。低营养组和中等营养组的犊牛在9月中旬和10月下旬停止生长。到12月,高营养组犊牛的体重分别比中、低营养组犊牛重40%和70%。到10月中旬,高营养组奶牛的脂肪积累比中、低营养组奶牛多约75%和300%。低营养组80%的奶牛无法受孕,中等营养组的奶牛比高营养组的奶牛晚10-14天。夏秋季节犊牛的营养状况影响犊牛的成活率。尽管在生命的第一个冬天几近饥饿,但那些夏秋营养丰富的幼崽怀孕的概率接近100%。小牛的冬季存活率与它们在冬季开始时的体型有关。体型较小的小牛比体型较大的小牛每天损失的体重更多,因此它们在冬天存活的时间更短。夏秋营养在很大程度上决定了小牛在冬季开始时的体型,从而决定了冬季存活的比例。奶牛在冬季的存活率与冬季开始时的体脂和冬季的营养有关。夏秋营养和分娩日期对翌年春季出生特征的影响较小。我们没有发现夏秋营养或秋季条件对出生质量有显著的携带效应,尽管秋季条件的降低推迟了随后的分娩日期。1998年冬季生存试验中奶牛体脂消耗程度占分娩日期变化的45%。90%的衰竭患者平均延迟分娩34天。由于性别比例严重失衡(极端情况下为3周),延迟分娩可能对自由放养的麋鹿的存活率只有微弱的影响。相比之下,饲料中DE含量的微小差异(10-20%)对奶牛的脂肪增加、怀孕概率以及犊牛的生长和越冬存活率很敏感。我们的两个较低营养水平的消化能水平反映了北美西部夏季和秋季大型有蹄类兽群的消化能范围。因此,我们的数据表明,夏秋营养对种群的限制作用可能比通常假设的更大,在某些生态系统中可能比冬季更大,因此表明需要更好地了解营养对种群动态的影响以及这种影响如何在空间和时间上变化。为了加强未来的研究,我们提出了基于动物和植被的准则来评估营养对麋鹿种群的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Monographs
Wildlife Monographs 生物-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wildlife Monographs supplements The Journal of Wildlife Management with focused investigations in the area of the management and conservation of wildlife. Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) CAB Abstracts® (CABI) Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database (ProQuest) Global Health (CABI) Grasslands & Forage Abstracts (CABI) Helminthological Abstracts (CABI) Natural Science Collection (ProQuest) Poultry Abstracts (CABI) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-543 Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts (CABI) Veterinary Bulletin (CABI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信