Evaluation of Maternal Penning to Improve Calf Survival in the Chisana Caribou Herd Évaluation des Enclos de Maternité pour Améliorer la Survie des Faons du Troupeau de Caribous Chisana

IF 4.3 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Layne G. Adams, Richard Farnell, Michelle P. Oakley, Thomas S. Jung, Lorne L. Larocque, Grant M. Lortie, Jamie Mclelland, Mason E. Reid, Gretchen H. Roffler, Don E. Russell
{"title":"Evaluation of Maternal Penning to Improve Calf Survival in the Chisana Caribou Herd\n Évaluation des Enclos de Maternité pour Améliorer la Survie des Faons du Troupeau de Caribous Chisana","authors":"Layne G. Adams,&nbsp;Richard Farnell,&nbsp;Michelle P. Oakley,&nbsp;Thomas S. Jung,&nbsp;Lorne L. Larocque,&nbsp;Grant M. Lortie,&nbsp;Jamie Mclelland,&nbsp;Mason E. Reid,&nbsp;Gretchen H. Roffler,&nbsp;Don E. Russell","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predation is a major limiting factor for most small sedentary caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) populations, particularly those that are threatened or endangered across the southern extent of the species’ range. Thus, reducing predation impacts is often a management goal for improving the status of small caribou populations, and lethal predator removal is the primary approach that has been applied. Given that predator control programs are often contentious, other management options that can garner broader public acceptance need to be considered.</p><p>Substantial calf losses to predation in the few weeks following birth are common for these small caribou populations. Therefore, we employed a novel experimental approach of maternal penning with the goal of reducing early calf mortality in the Chisana Caribou Herd, a declining population in southwest Yukon and adjacent Alaska thought to number around 300 individuals. Maternal penning entailed temporarily holding pregnant females on their native range in a large pen secure from predators from late March through the initial weeks of calf rearing to mid-June. During 2003–2006, we conducted 4 annual penning trials with 17–50 pregnant females each year (<i>n</i> = 146 total), assessed survival of calves born in the pens, and evaluated survival and nutritional effects of penning for females that were held. We also investigated the herd's population dynamics during 2003–2008 to determine effects of maternal penning on calf recruitment and population growth. In addition to information gained during maternal penning, we determined natality and survival patterns via radiotelemetry, conducted autumn age-sex composition surveys each year, and censused the population in mid-October 2003, 2005, and 2007. Based on our penning trials and demographic investigations, we used simulation models to evaluate the effects of maternal penning relative to a population's inherent growth rate (finite rate of increase [λ] without maternal penning) and penning effort (proportion of calves born in penning) to provide perspective on utility of this approach for improving the status of small imperiled caribou populations.</p><p>Pregnant females held in maternal penning tolerated captivity well in that they exhibited positive nutritional responses to <i>ad libitum</i> feed we provided and higher survival than free-ranging females (0.993 and 0.951 for penned and free-ranging females, respectively). Survival of pen calves from birth to mid-June was substantially higher than that of free-ranging calves ( = 0.950 and 0.376, respectively). This initial period accounted for 76% of the annual calf mortality in the free-ranging population. Pen-born calves maintained their survival advantage over wild-born calves to the end of their first year ( = 0.575 and 0.192, respectively) during years penning occurred.</p><p>Females in the Chisana Herd were highly productive with 57% producing their first offspring at 2 years of age, and annual natality rates averaging 0.842 calves/female ≥2 years old. Age-specific natality rates exceeded 0.900 for 4–9-year-olds, then exhibited senescent decline to 0.467 by 19 years old. Annual survival of free-ranging adult females and calves averaged 0.892 and 0.184, respectively, over all study years; both were reduced during 2004 because of poor winter survival. We noted reduced nutritional condition of caribou late that winter in that females we captured were lighter than in other years and produced lighter calves. We suspect that the reduced survival during winter 2004 and the observed nutritional characteristics resulted from adverse snow conditions in combination with effects of the extreme drought experienced the previous summer. Age-specific survival of adult females was ≥0.900 through 10 years of age, then declined with age.</p><p>The Chisana Herd numbered 720 caribou in mid-October 2003, or more than twice that estimated prior to initiating maternal penning, and increased to 766 caribou by mid-October 2007. We calculated that penning added 54.2 yearling recruits, or 40% of calves released from penning. Based on the maternal penning results and the population's vital rates, we determined that the herd would have been stable during 2003–2007 at about 713 caribou without maternal penning; thus, the increase in herd size we observed resulted from maternal penning and was equivalent to the estimate of additional yearling recruits. The improvement in the population trend invoked by maternal penning was limited by the larger than expected population size and resulting low penning effort ( = 11% of calves born in pen).</p><p>Our simulations corroborated that maternal penning increased population size by the number of additional recruits provided, even at low penning effort, for inherently stable populations. As the inherent rate of increase dropped below λ = 1.000, more of the additional recruits from penning were needed to offset the downward population inertia, thus requiring increased penning effort to reach stability. For populations declining at λ &lt; 0.890, stability could not be achieved with 100% penning effort given the vital rates in our models.</p><p>Maternal penning in its limited application to date has proven to be broadly popular as a nonlethal management action aimed at reducing initial calf mortality from predation in small caribou populations. However, based on the Chisana program and 3 subsequent efforts elsewhere, improvement in population trends have been modest at best and come at a high financial cost. Given the necessity of maximizing penning effort, maternal penning may have a role in addressing conservation challenges for some small caribou populations that are stable or slowly declining, but its application should be primarily driven by objective assessment of the likelihood of improving population trends rather than popularity relative to other management options.</p>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":"204 1","pages":"5-46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1044","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.1044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Predation is a major limiting factor for most small sedentary caribou (Rangifer tarandus) populations, particularly those that are threatened or endangered across the southern extent of the species’ range. Thus, reducing predation impacts is often a management goal for improving the status of small caribou populations, and lethal predator removal is the primary approach that has been applied. Given that predator control programs are often contentious, other management options that can garner broader public acceptance need to be considered.

Substantial calf losses to predation in the few weeks following birth are common for these small caribou populations. Therefore, we employed a novel experimental approach of maternal penning with the goal of reducing early calf mortality in the Chisana Caribou Herd, a declining population in southwest Yukon and adjacent Alaska thought to number around 300 individuals. Maternal penning entailed temporarily holding pregnant females on their native range in a large pen secure from predators from late March through the initial weeks of calf rearing to mid-June. During 2003–2006, we conducted 4 annual penning trials with 17–50 pregnant females each year (n = 146 total), assessed survival of calves born in the pens, and evaluated survival and nutritional effects of penning for females that were held. We also investigated the herd's population dynamics during 2003–2008 to determine effects of maternal penning on calf recruitment and population growth. In addition to information gained during maternal penning, we determined natality and survival patterns via radiotelemetry, conducted autumn age-sex composition surveys each year, and censused the population in mid-October 2003, 2005, and 2007. Based on our penning trials and demographic investigations, we used simulation models to evaluate the effects of maternal penning relative to a population's inherent growth rate (finite rate of increase [λ] without maternal penning) and penning effort (proportion of calves born in penning) to provide perspective on utility of this approach for improving the status of small imperiled caribou populations.

Pregnant females held in maternal penning tolerated captivity well in that they exhibited positive nutritional responses to ad libitum feed we provided and higher survival than free-ranging females (0.993 and 0.951 for penned and free-ranging females, respectively). Survival of pen calves from birth to mid-June was substantially higher than that of free-ranging calves ( = 0.950 and 0.376, respectively). This initial period accounted for 76% of the annual calf mortality in the free-ranging population. Pen-born calves maintained their survival advantage over wild-born calves to the end of their first year ( = 0.575 and 0.192, respectively) during years penning occurred.

Females in the Chisana Herd were highly productive with 57% producing their first offspring at 2 years of age, and annual natality rates averaging 0.842 calves/female ≥2 years old. Age-specific natality rates exceeded 0.900 for 4–9-year-olds, then exhibited senescent decline to 0.467 by 19 years old. Annual survival of free-ranging adult females and calves averaged 0.892 and 0.184, respectively, over all study years; both were reduced during 2004 because of poor winter survival. We noted reduced nutritional condition of caribou late that winter in that females we captured were lighter than in other years and produced lighter calves. We suspect that the reduced survival during winter 2004 and the observed nutritional characteristics resulted from adverse snow conditions in combination with effects of the extreme drought experienced the previous summer. Age-specific survival of adult females was ≥0.900 through 10 years of age, then declined with age.

The Chisana Herd numbered 720 caribou in mid-October 2003, or more than twice that estimated prior to initiating maternal penning, and increased to 766 caribou by mid-October 2007. We calculated that penning added 54.2 yearling recruits, or 40% of calves released from penning. Based on the maternal penning results and the population's vital rates, we determined that the herd would have been stable during 2003–2007 at about 713 caribou without maternal penning; thus, the increase in herd size we observed resulted from maternal penning and was equivalent to the estimate of additional yearling recruits. The improvement in the population trend invoked by maternal penning was limited by the larger than expected population size and resulting low penning effort ( = 11% of calves born in pen).

Our simulations corroborated that maternal penning increased population size by the number of additional recruits provided, even at low penning effort, for inherently stable populations. As the inherent rate of increase dropped below λ = 1.000, more of the additional recruits from penning were needed to offset the downward population inertia, thus requiring increased penning effort to reach stability. For populations declining at λ < 0.890, stability could not be achieved with 100% penning effort given the vital rates in our models.

Maternal penning in its limited application to date has proven to be broadly popular as a nonlethal management action aimed at reducing initial calf mortality from predation in small caribou populations. However, based on the Chisana program and 3 subsequent efforts elsewhere, improvement in population trends have been modest at best and come at a high financial cost. Given the necessity of maximizing penning effort, maternal penning may have a role in addressing conservation challenges for some small caribou populations that are stable or slowly declining, but its application should be primarily driven by objective assessment of the likelihood of improving population trends rather than popularity relative to other management options.

Abstract Image

对奇萨纳驯鹿群中母性圈养以提高小牛存活率的评价对奇萨纳驯鹿群中母性圈养以提高小牛存活率的评价
捕食是大多数小型定居驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus)种群的主要限制因素,特别是那些在该物种分布范围的南部地区受到威胁或濒临灭绝的驯鹿。因此,减少捕食者的影响通常是改善小型驯鹿种群状况的管理目标,而消除致命的捕食者是已应用的主要方法。鉴于食肉动物控制项目经常引起争议,需要考虑其他能够获得更广泛公众接受的管理方案。对于这些小驯鹿群来说,在出生后的几周内,大量的小鹿因捕食而死亡是很常见的。因此,我们采用了一种新颖的实验方法,目的是降低奇萨纳驯鹿群的早期幼崽死亡率。奇萨纳驯鹿群位于育空地区西南部和邻近的阿拉斯加,种群数量正在下降,据估计约有300只。从3月下旬到6月中旬,母性圈养需要暂时把怀孕的母鲸关在一个大围栏里,以保护它们免受捕食者的侵害。在2003-2006年期间,我们每年对17-50只怀孕雌性进行4次圈养试验(n = 146),评估在围栏中出生的小牛的存活率,并评估圈养雌性的存活率和营养效果。我们还调查了2003-2008年间鹿群的种群动态,以确定母围栏对小牛招募和种群增长的影响。除了在母体发育期间获得的信息外,我们还通过无线电遥测确定了出生和生存模式,每年进行秋季年龄-性别组成调查,并在2003年、2005年和2007年10月中旬进行人口普查。基于我们的圈养试验和人口统计调查,我们使用模拟模型来评估母鹿圈养相对于种群固有增长率(没有母鹿圈养的有限增长率[λ])和圈养努力(在圈养中出生的小牛比例)的影响,以提供这种方法在改善小型濒危驯鹿种群状况方面的效用视角。母鼠圈养的怀孕雌鼠对自由放养的饲料表现出积极的营养反应,其存活率高于自由放养的雌鼠(分别为0.993和0.951)。圈养犊牛从出生到6月中旬的成活率显著高于散养犊牛(分别= 0.950和0.376)。这一初始阶段占自由放养种群每年小牛死亡率的76%。在圈养期间,圈养犊牛与野生犊牛的生存优势一直保持到第一年结束(分别= 0.575和0.192)。在Chisana牧群中,有57%的母象在2岁时产下第一个后代,年平均出生率为0.842头/头≥2岁的母象。4 - 9岁年龄组的死亡率超过0.900,到19岁时出现衰老下降,为0.467。在所有研究年份中,自由放养的成年雌性和小牛的年平均存活率分别为0.892和0.184;由于冬季生存能力差,两者在2004年都有所减少。我们注意到那年冬末驯鹿的营养状况有所下降,因为我们捕获的雌性驯鹿比往年更轻,产下的小牛也更轻。我们怀疑2004年冬季的存活率下降和观察到的营养特征是由于不利的雪况和前一个夏天经历的极端干旱的影响。成年雌鼠的年龄特异性生存率≥0.900,10岁后随年龄增长而下降。2003年10月中旬,奇萨纳鹿群的驯鹿数量为720头,是开始母圈之前估计数量的两倍多,到2007年10月中旬增加到766头。根据我们的计算,圈养增加了54.2只一岁的幼崽,占圈养释放的幼崽的40%。根据母鹿围圈的结果和种群的生命率,我们确定在2003-2007年期间,驯鹿群在没有母鹿围圈的情况下稳定在713头左右;因此,我们观察到的畜群规模的增加是由于母鼠围栏造成的,相当于估计的额外的一岁新兵。由于种群规模大于预期,以及由此导致的圈养努力较低(约11%的小牛在圈养中出生),母体圈养引起的种群趋势改善受到限制。我们的模拟证实,即使在较低的圈养努力下,对于固有稳定的种群,母体圈养也会通过提供额外的新兵数量来增加种群规模。由于固有增长率降至λ = 1 000以下,需要更多的圈养人员来抵消人口下降的惯性,因此需要增加圈养工作以达到稳定。 对于λ &lt下降的种群;0.890,考虑到我们模型中的关键速率,稳定性无法以100%的笔划努力实现。迄今为止,母围栏在其有限的应用中已被证明是广泛流行的,作为一种非致命的管理行动,旨在减少小驯鹿种群中被捕食的初始小牛死亡率。然而,根据Chisana计划和其他地方随后的努力,人口趋势的改善充其量是适度的,而且需要付出高昂的财政代价。考虑到最大限度地提高围护力度的必要性,母围护可能在解决一些稳定或缓慢下降的小型驯鹿种群的保护挑战方面发挥作用,但其应用应主要基于对改善种群趋势可能性的客观评估,而不是相对于其他管理方案的受欢迎程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Monographs
Wildlife Monographs 生物-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wildlife Monographs supplements The Journal of Wildlife Management with focused investigations in the area of the management and conservation of wildlife. Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) CAB Abstracts® (CABI) Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database (ProQuest) Global Health (CABI) Grasslands & Forage Abstracts (CABI) Helminthological Abstracts (CABI) Natural Science Collection (ProQuest) Poultry Abstracts (CABI) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-543 Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts (CABI) Veterinary Bulletin (CABI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信