Towards cross-border CBDC interoperability: insights from a multivocal literature review

IF 7.4 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Marinos Themistocleous, Paulo Rupino da Cunha, Evangelos Tabakis, M. Papadaki
{"title":"Towards cross-border CBDC interoperability: insights from a multivocal literature review","authors":"Marinos Themistocleous, Paulo Rupino da Cunha, Evangelos Tabakis, M. Papadaki","doi":"10.1108/jeim-11-2022-0411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeCentral banks from more than 100 countries, representing 95% of the global financial output, are studying Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). CBDCs can potentially enable safe, efficient and inexpensive cross-border and cross-currency payments in today's interconnected financial system. However, a critical factor influencing their expansion is cross-border interoperability. Therefore, there is a high demand from central banks, researchers, computer scientists, policy- and decision-makers to explore this topic further. Its better understanding will improve information management, enhance the decision-making process, and result in the redesign of central banks' processes and products (digital currencies).Design/methodology/approachThe authors investigate this novel and timely topic by conducting a Multivocal Systematic Literature Review (MSLR) on CBDCs cross-border interoperability. Additionally, the authors collect and analyze empirical data from various online resources such as CBDC trackers.FindingsThe authors conclude that although the academic literature on CBDC cross-border interoperability is very limited, valuable documents published by central banks and other entities discuss this issue and provide valuable insights. The authors paid particular attention to the reports published by the Bank of International Settlement (BIS) as it proposes three different models for CBDC cross-border interoperability. The study research reveals that most CBDC cross-border interoperability projects run by several central banks and other organizations explore these three BIS models. For this research, the authors performed an in-depth study of CBDC cross-border interoperability cases to investigate all three BIS models. The findings illustrate that although technical interoperability is feasible, plenty of work needs to be done in terms of standards and interfaces. In addition, other non-technical interoperability areas need to be explored and addressed, as there are concerns related to legal issues, regulations, jurisdictional boundaries, policy challenges and governance.Research limitations/implicationsResearch on CBDCs is progressing quickly, so, despite the authors’ use of an MSLR to identify the state-of-the-art, interested parties should be aware that new information is prone to appear imminently. Hence, this study work should be understood as a basis to build upon. Also, although the authors have included major academic databases in this study search, there is the possibility that a few papers may have been published in outlets that the authors have not covered. Finally, since the search in the grey literature returned thousands of hits, the authors had to define a stopping criterion for the documents to analyze.Practical implicationsThe authors provide insights on the current state of CBDC cross-border interoperability, which is valuable to policy- and decision-makers currently assessing the situation and deciding on avenues to pursue.Originality/valueThe authors provide an integrated and critical view of the developments of CBDC cross-border interoperability, considering not only available academic literature but also fundamental documents from key institutions such as central banks and related organizations.","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"36 1","pages":"1296-1318"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-11-2022-0411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeCentral banks from more than 100 countries, representing 95% of the global financial output, are studying Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). CBDCs can potentially enable safe, efficient and inexpensive cross-border and cross-currency payments in today's interconnected financial system. However, a critical factor influencing their expansion is cross-border interoperability. Therefore, there is a high demand from central banks, researchers, computer scientists, policy- and decision-makers to explore this topic further. Its better understanding will improve information management, enhance the decision-making process, and result in the redesign of central banks' processes and products (digital currencies).Design/methodology/approachThe authors investigate this novel and timely topic by conducting a Multivocal Systematic Literature Review (MSLR) on CBDCs cross-border interoperability. Additionally, the authors collect and analyze empirical data from various online resources such as CBDC trackers.FindingsThe authors conclude that although the academic literature on CBDC cross-border interoperability is very limited, valuable documents published by central banks and other entities discuss this issue and provide valuable insights. The authors paid particular attention to the reports published by the Bank of International Settlement (BIS) as it proposes three different models for CBDC cross-border interoperability. The study research reveals that most CBDC cross-border interoperability projects run by several central banks and other organizations explore these three BIS models. For this research, the authors performed an in-depth study of CBDC cross-border interoperability cases to investigate all three BIS models. The findings illustrate that although technical interoperability is feasible, plenty of work needs to be done in terms of standards and interfaces. In addition, other non-technical interoperability areas need to be explored and addressed, as there are concerns related to legal issues, regulations, jurisdictional boundaries, policy challenges and governance.Research limitations/implicationsResearch on CBDCs is progressing quickly, so, despite the authors’ use of an MSLR to identify the state-of-the-art, interested parties should be aware that new information is prone to appear imminently. Hence, this study work should be understood as a basis to build upon. Also, although the authors have included major academic databases in this study search, there is the possibility that a few papers may have been published in outlets that the authors have not covered. Finally, since the search in the grey literature returned thousands of hits, the authors had to define a stopping criterion for the documents to analyze.Practical implicationsThe authors provide insights on the current state of CBDC cross-border interoperability, which is valuable to policy- and decision-makers currently assessing the situation and deciding on avenues to pursue.Originality/valueThe authors provide an integrated and critical view of the developments of CBDC cross-border interoperability, considering not only available academic literature but also fundamental documents from key institutions such as central banks and related organizations.
跨境CBDC互操作性:来自多声音文献综述的见解
占全球金融产出95%的100多个国家的央行正在研究央行数字货币(cbdc)。在当今相互关联的金融体系中,cbdc有可能实现安全、高效和廉价的跨境和跨货币支付。然而,影响其扩展的一个关键因素是跨界互操作性。因此,中央银行、研究人员、计算机科学家、政策制定者和决策者都迫切需要进一步探索这一主题。对其更好的理解将改善信息管理,加强决策过程,并导致中央银行流程和产品(数字货币)的重新设计。作者通过对cbdc跨境互操作性进行多声系统文献综述(MSLR)来研究这一新颖而及时的主题。此外,作者还收集和分析了来自CBDC跟踪器等各种在线资源的经验数据。作者得出结论,尽管关于CBDC跨境互操作性的学术文献非常有限,但中央银行和其他实体发表的有价值的文件讨论了这一问题,并提供了有价值的见解。作者特别关注了国际清算银行(BIS)发布的报告,因为它提出了三种不同的CBDC跨境互操作性模型。研究表明,由几家中央银行和其他组织运营的大多数CBDC跨境互操作性项目都探索了这三种BIS模型。在这项研究中,作者对CBDC跨境互操作性案例进行了深入研究,以调查所有三种BIS模型。研究结果表明,尽管技术互操作性是可行的,但在标准和接口方面还需要做大量的工作。此外,需要探索和处理其他非技术互操作性领域,因为存在与法律问题、法规、管辖边界、政策挑战和治理相关的问题。研究限制/影响对cbdc的研究进展迅速,因此,尽管作者使用单反相机来识别最先进的技术,但有关各方应该意识到,新的信息很容易马上出现。因此,这项研究工作应该被理解为建立的基础。此外,尽管作者在本研究检索中包含了主要的学术数据库,但仍有可能有一些论文已在作者未涵盖的出版物上发表。最后,由于在灰色文献中搜索返回了数千个点击,作者必须定义一个停止标准来分析文件。作者提供了关于CBDC跨境互操作性现状的见解,这对于目前评估形势并决定采取何种途径的政策和决策者来说是有价值的。原创性/价值作者对CBDC跨境互操作性的发展提供了一个综合和批判性的观点,不仅考虑了现有的学术文献,还考虑了中央银行和相关组织等关键机构的基本文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信