Radical innovations as supply chain disruptions? A paradox between change and stability

IF 10.2 2区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Journal of Supply Chain Management Pub Date : 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1111/jscm.12299

Canan Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Sinéad Roden, Evelyne Vanpoucke, Byung-Gak Son, Marianne W. Lewis

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Supply chains withstand multiple tensions, and some of which are paradoxical. Radical product and process innovations bring such tensions to the forefront by disrupting supply chains. Using two illustrations, this article considers the paradoxical tension between change and stability in upstream supply chains, which becomes particularly salient after radical innovation. Furthermore, the article discusses why and how paradox theory can help firms understand and manage this pressing tension between stability and change. This article then presents future research opportunities for using paradox theory to investigate other persistent post-innovation tensions in upstream supply chains. The aim of this article is to encourage new studies that develop responses to such paradoxical tensions, an area ripe for research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

激进创新是供应链中断吗?变化与稳定之间的矛盾

供应链承受多重压力，其中一些是矛盾的。激进的产品和工艺创新通过扰乱供应链，将这种紧张关系推向了最前沿。通过两个例子，本文考虑了上游供应链中变化与稳定之间的矛盾张力，这在激进创新之后变得尤为突出。此外，本文还讨论了悖论理论为什么以及如何帮助企业理解和管理这种稳定与变化之间的紧迫紧张关系。然后，本文提出了使用悖论理论来研究上游供应链中其他持续的创新后紧张关系的未来研究机会。本文的目的是鼓励对这种矛盾的紧张局势作出反应的新研究，这是一个成熟的研究领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Supply Chain Management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

16.00

自引率

6.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： ournal of Supply Chain Management Mission: The mission of the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) is to be the premier choice among supply chain management scholars from various disciplines. It aims to attract high-quality, impactful behavioral research that focuses on theory building and employs rigorous empirical methodologies. Article Requirements: An article published in JSCM must make a significant contribution to supply chain management theory. This contribution can be achieved through either an inductive, theory-building process or a deductive, theory-testing approach. This contribution may manifest in various ways, such as falsification of conventional understanding, theory-building through conceptual development, inductive or qualitative research, initial empirical testing of a theory, theoretically-based meta-analysis, or constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory. Theoretical Contribution: Manuscripts should explicitly convey the theoretical contribution relative to the existing supply chain management literature, and when appropriate, to the literature outside of supply chain management (e.g., management theory, psychology, economics). Empirical Contribution: Manuscripts published in JSCM must also provide strong empirical contributions. While conceptual manuscripts are welcomed, they must significantly advance theory in the field of supply chain management and be firmly grounded in existing theory and relevant literature. For empirical manuscripts, authors must adequately assess validity, which is essential for empirical research, whether quantitative or qualitative.