S. Johnson, Roseann Nasser, Cherith L. McGregor, Krista R. Sawatzky, Kimberly T. Thieu, Sharon Walker, Jean Coleman
{"title":"Insights from a retrospective chart audit of oral nutrition supplement use in long-term care","authors":"S. Johnson, Roseann Nasser, Cherith L. McGregor, Krista R. Sawatzky, Kimberly T. Thieu, Sharon Walker, Jean Coleman","doi":"10.1097/HXR.0000000000000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prescribing oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in long-term care (LTC) has steadily increased over time. This study aimed to develop insight into ONS use and prescription practices from a retrospective chart audit in LTC. Methods: A standard tool collected data on background/demographics, nutritional assessment, intervention and monitoring information. A chart audit was conducted on 38 residents prescribed with ONS in 4 LTC homes. Results: In 68% (n=25/38) of the charts, researchers were able to determine whether residents received ONS daily. Ninety-six percent (n=24/25) received ONS on a daily basis. In 13% (5/38) of the charts, weight loss, poor appetite, and/or blood glucose control were indications for ONS. In 21% (n=8/38), there were attempts to increase caloric intake using food and/or fortified foods. Of the charts reviewed, 84% (n=32/38) had documentation of monitoring (eg, weight, dietary intake) and of these, 72% (n=23/32) had documentation done annually. Only 34% (13/38) of the charts had prescriber information and the most common prescriber of ONS were physicians (85%, n=11/13). Conclusions: There is limited information collected regarding ONS use and prescribing practices are inconsistent. Guidelines, policies, and education are required to support ONS practice in LTC homes and should involve dietitians.","PeriodicalId":90841,"journal":{"name":"Healthy aging research","volume":"7 1","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HXR.0000000000000015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HXR.0000000000000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prescribing oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in long-term care (LTC) has steadily increased over time. This study aimed to develop insight into ONS use and prescription practices from a retrospective chart audit in LTC. Methods: A standard tool collected data on background/demographics, nutritional assessment, intervention and monitoring information. A chart audit was conducted on 38 residents prescribed with ONS in 4 LTC homes. Results: In 68% (n=25/38) of the charts, researchers were able to determine whether residents received ONS daily. Ninety-six percent (n=24/25) received ONS on a daily basis. In 13% (5/38) of the charts, weight loss, poor appetite, and/or blood glucose control were indications for ONS. In 21% (n=8/38), there were attempts to increase caloric intake using food and/or fortified foods. Of the charts reviewed, 84% (n=32/38) had documentation of monitoring (eg, weight, dietary intake) and of these, 72% (n=23/32) had documentation done annually. Only 34% (13/38) of the charts had prescriber information and the most common prescriber of ONS were physicians (85%, n=11/13). Conclusions: There is limited information collected regarding ONS use and prescribing practices are inconsistent. Guidelines, policies, and education are required to support ONS practice in LTC homes and should involve dietitians.