Insights from a retrospective chart audit of oral nutrition supplement use in long-term care

S. Johnson, Roseann Nasser, Cherith L. McGregor, Krista R. Sawatzky, Kimberly T. Thieu, Sharon Walker, Jean Coleman
{"title":"Insights from a retrospective chart audit of oral nutrition supplement use in long-term care","authors":"S. Johnson, Roseann Nasser, Cherith L. McGregor, Krista R. Sawatzky, Kimberly T. Thieu, Sharon Walker, Jean Coleman","doi":"10.1097/HXR.0000000000000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prescribing oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in long-term care (LTC) has steadily increased over time. This study aimed to develop insight into ONS use and prescription practices from a retrospective chart audit in LTC. Methods: A standard tool collected data on background/demographics, nutritional assessment, intervention and monitoring information. A chart audit was conducted on 38 residents prescribed with ONS in 4 LTC homes. Results: In 68% (n=25/38) of the charts, researchers were able to determine whether residents received ONS daily. Ninety-six percent (n=24/25) received ONS on a daily basis. In 13% (5/38) of the charts, weight loss, poor appetite, and/or blood glucose control were indications for ONS. In 21% (n=8/38), there were attempts to increase caloric intake using food and/or fortified foods. Of the charts reviewed, 84% (n=32/38) had documentation of monitoring (eg, weight, dietary intake) and of these, 72% (n=23/32) had documentation done annually. Only 34% (13/38) of the charts had prescriber information and the most common prescriber of ONS were physicians (85%, n=11/13). Conclusions: There is limited information collected regarding ONS use and prescribing practices are inconsistent. Guidelines, policies, and education are required to support ONS practice in LTC homes and should involve dietitians.","PeriodicalId":90841,"journal":{"name":"Healthy aging research","volume":"7 1","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HXR.0000000000000015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HXR.0000000000000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescribing oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in long-term care (LTC) has steadily increased over time. This study aimed to develop insight into ONS use and prescription practices from a retrospective chart audit in LTC. Methods: A standard tool collected data on background/demographics, nutritional assessment, intervention and monitoring information. A chart audit was conducted on 38 residents prescribed with ONS in 4 LTC homes. Results: In 68% (n=25/38) of the charts, researchers were able to determine whether residents received ONS daily. Ninety-six percent (n=24/25) received ONS on a daily basis. In 13% (5/38) of the charts, weight loss, poor appetite, and/or blood glucose control were indications for ONS. In 21% (n=8/38), there were attempts to increase caloric intake using food and/or fortified foods. Of the charts reviewed, 84% (n=32/38) had documentation of monitoring (eg, weight, dietary intake) and of these, 72% (n=23/32) had documentation done annually. Only 34% (13/38) of the charts had prescriber information and the most common prescriber of ONS were physicians (85%, n=11/13). Conclusions: There is limited information collected regarding ONS use and prescribing practices are inconsistent. Guidelines, policies, and education are required to support ONS practice in LTC homes and should involve dietitians.
从长期护理中口服营养补充剂使用的回顾性图表审计的见解
背景:长期护理(LTC)处方口服营养补充剂(ONS)稳步增加。本研究旨在通过对LTC的回顾性图表审计,深入了解ONS的使用和处方实践。方法:采用标准工具收集背景/人口统计、营养评估、干预和监测信息。对4家长期服务中心的38名居民进行了图表审计。结果:在68% (n=25/38)的图表中,研究人员能够确定居民是否每天都收到ONS。96% (n=24/25)的人每天都接受ONS。在13%(5/38)的图表中,体重减轻、食欲不振和/或血糖控制是ONS的适应症。21% (n=8/38)的人试图通过食用食物和/或强化食品来增加热量摄入。在审查的图表中,84% (n=32/38)有监测文件(例如,体重,饮食摄入),其中72% (n=23/32)每年进行一次记录。只有34%(13/38)的图表有处方信息,ONS最常见的处方者是医生(85%,n=11/13)。结论:收集到的关于ONS使用的信息有限,处方实践不一致。指导方针、政策和教育需要支持长期护理家庭的ONS实践,并应包括营养师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书