Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages.

O. Diedrich, L. Perlick, O. Schmitt, C. Kraft
{"title":"Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages.","authors":"O. Diedrich, L. Perlick, O. Schmitt, C. Kraft","doi":"10.1097/00002517-200112000-00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of determining solidity of a fused spinal segment still remains. Our purpose is to evaluate radiographic findings after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cages and estimate their relative value in judging fusion status. Radiographic follow-up was performed in patients after PLIF with cages of either radiotranslucent or radiopaque material. Conventional radiographs were obtained 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and then yearly after surgery for spinal instability for 64 patients. We differentiated between uncertain (increased density within the cage, increase of sclerotic endplates, and posterolateral fusion) and definite (trabecular continuous bone bridging within the implant and periimplant new bone formation with bridging of the intervertebral space) fusion signs. A fusion rate of 51.5% after 12 months, 61.4% after 24 months, 66.7% after 36 months, and 77.8% after 48 months postoperatively was found. We found only a slight, nonsignificant correlation between radiographic fusion and patient-assessed clinical outcome. There is evidence that radiographic fusion criteria occur in a specific chronologic order. The interpretation of fusion status is notably impaired by the use of radiopaque cages. Criteria to standardize the interpretation and evaluation of radiographic findings after PLIF are discussed.","PeriodicalId":77226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spinal disorders","volume":"60 1","pages":"522-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00002517-200112000-00012","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spinal disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200112000-00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

The problem of determining solidity of a fused spinal segment still remains. Our purpose is to evaluate radiographic findings after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cages and estimate their relative value in judging fusion status. Radiographic follow-up was performed in patients after PLIF with cages of either radiotranslucent or radiopaque material. Conventional radiographs were obtained 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and then yearly after surgery for spinal instability for 64 patients. We differentiated between uncertain (increased density within the cage, increase of sclerotic endplates, and posterolateral fusion) and definite (trabecular continuous bone bridging within the implant and periimplant new bone formation with bridging of the intervertebral space) fusion signs. A fusion rate of 51.5% after 12 months, 61.4% after 24 months, 66.7% after 36 months, and 77.8% after 48 months postoperatively was found. We found only a slight, nonsignificant correlation between radiographic fusion and patient-assessed clinical outcome. There is evidence that radiographic fusion criteria occur in a specific chronologic order. The interpretation of fusion status is notably impaired by the use of radiopaque cages. Criteria to standardize the interpretation and evaluation of radiographic findings after PLIF are discussed.
后路腰椎椎体间融合术后常规x线片的影像学特征:放射性透明与不透明椎体间融合器的比较研究。
确定融合脊柱节段的坚固性的问题仍然存在。我们的目的是评估后路腰椎椎体间融合(PLIF)固定架后的影像学表现,并评估其在判断融合状态方面的相对价值。对PLIF术后患者用放射半透明或放射不透明材料笼进行影像学随访。64例脊柱不稳定患者术后6周、3、6个月及每年进行常规x线片检查。我们区分了不确定(保持器内密度增加、终板硬化增加和后外侧融合)和确定(种植体内小梁连续骨桥接和种植体周围新骨形成伴椎间隙桥接)融合征象。术后12个月、24个月、36个月、48个月的融合率分别为51.5%、61.4%、66.7%和77.8%。我们发现放射融合与患者评估的临床结果之间只有轻微的、不显著的相关性。有证据表明放射学融合标准是按特定的时间顺序发生的。不透射线笼的使用明显损害了融合状态的解释。讨论了PLIF术后影像学表现的解释和评价标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信