Regenerative Agriculture: A Farmer-Led Initiative to Build Resiliency in Food Systems
Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
James O. Eckberg, Steven T. Rosenzweig
求助PDF
{"title":"Regenerative Agriculture: A Farmer-Led Initiative to Build Resiliency in Food Systems","authors":"James O. Eckberg, Steven T. Rosenzweig","doi":"10.1094/cfw-65-6-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The resiliency of cereal grain food systems is threatened by the agricultural degradation of natural resources. Addressing this global challenge will require us to rethink the ways in which grains are produced. An emerging farmer-led movement known as regenerative agriculture may provide a pathway to reverse the degradation of agroecosystems, with the potential to enhance food system resilience. Regenerative agriculture reimagines conventional agriculture around a holistic set of nature-based principles to restore soil health, biodiversity, and farm economics. Although a multitude of complex barriers exist for farmers to transition to regenerative systems, companies in the food and agricultural sector are beginning to develop initiatives that can support the regenerative agricultural movement. By redefining their own approaches to sustainability, these companies are charting new paths to accelerate farmer adoption of regenerative agriculture that improves socioeconomic and environmental resiliency throughout food systems. Food systems are increasingly vulnerable to disruption, which affects the price, quality, and availability of food for people worldwide. Stressors such as climate change bring both sudden shocks (e.g., catastrophic weather events) and gradually mounting pressures (e.g., shifting temperature and precipitation patterns), threatening the stable, affordable supply of staple foods like cereals and pulses (16,25,26). The current trajectory of global warming is expected to cause water scarcity and production shocks to 60% of the world’s wheat-growing area by the end of the century (27). At the same time, global demand for cereal grains is rising by nearly 1% annually (2). Although agriculture continues to increase yields, gains in cereal grain production may not be able to keep pace with growing global demand (13). Furthermore, numerous vulnerabilities that exist within the food system exacerbate the risk to global production, one of which is the continued degradation of natural resources essential to food production. Worsening trends in soil degradation (11,17), biodiversity loss (8,23), and reductions in water quality and quantity (13,19) are weakening the ability of agricultural systems to maintain or increase food production, particularly in the face of climate change (9). Restoring farm ecosystems and reversing trends in degradation of natural resources is critical to bolstering resilience in agricultural and food systems to meet the nutritional needs of a growing global population. A History of Agricultural Revolutions The problems facing agriculture did not develop overnight; they reflect a complex history punctuated by revolutions in biology and technology. The Green Revolution emerged in industrialized nations post-World War II with the promise to feed the world. It laid the foundation for the predominant industrial production model of agriculture by boosting yields through advanced varieties of wheat and rice and greater use of fertilizers and other inputs. Indeed, one of its founders, Norman Borlaug, was credited with saving over a billion lives from starvation and received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970. However, the large increase in inputs (e.g., pesticides and synthetic fertilizers) required to support massive growth in crop yields has also led to detrimental, unintended environmental effects. Later, the biotech revolution of the 1990s transformed crop genomes, inserting traits to simplify management of insect and weed pests. While these revolutions in agriculture were hailed as major successes of their time, they were and remain grounded in an industrial production paradigm that promotes high yields at the risk of soil, water, and air quality and reduced biodiversity. Industrial agriculture continues to iterate based on the same paradigm, with a more recent focus on precision technologies to improve the efficiency of agrochemical use in production systems. While important efficiency gains have been made, they are unlikely to be sufficient and may even be counterproductive to the goal of maintaining a stable, resilient food system (3). A paradigm shift away from a singular focus on industrial solutions to ecological principles as a source of agricultural innovation can help restore natural resources and build economic and ecosystem resilience in farm ecosystems (3,25). Regenerative Agriculture: An Ecological Approach Ecological approaches have been widely promoted as a key strategy for supporting agricultural and food system resilience (25). These approaches focus on restoring a farm’s natural ecosystem processes (e.g., water and nutrient cycling), as opposed to relying as much on chemical inputs. Agroecological approaches have been the foundation of a wide array of farmer-led movements globally, yet they have only recently taken hold among large-scale farms in a farmer-led movement called regenerative agriculture. Regenerative agriculture is a holistic approach to farming or ranching based on six principles for restoring agroecosystems: understanding the context of the farm or ranch, minimizing soil and ecological disturbance (e.g., tillage, pesticides, synthetic fertilizers), keeping the soil covered, maintaining living roots in the soil as long as possible throughout the year, maximizing diversity, and integrating livestock. Independently, these principles are not new to farmers. Farmers have used individual practices and parts of regenerative agriculture for decades and centuries, depending on the practice. However, singular implementation of practices like no-tillage, in many cases, have delivered limited benefits or even trade-offs, such as yield reduction (20). Regenerative agriculture holistically implements the six principles to drive additive and synergistic improvements to restore healthy farm ecosystems and reverse soil degradation, biodiversity loss, and even profitability decline Regenerative Agriculture: A Farmer-Led Initiative to Build Resiliency in Food Systems James O. Eckberg and Steven T. Rosenzweig General Mills, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A. https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065 © 2020 Cereals & Grains Association CEREAL FOODS WORLD, NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2020, VOL. 65, NO. 6 / DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065 (1,12,15,17,18). These same principles increase agroecosystem resilience. Crop diversification, for example, was recently shown to mitigate yield losses due to drought by as much as 90% in North America (4), and many others are finding similar benefits for resiliency using other combinations of regenerative principles (7,24).","PeriodicalId":50707,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Foods World","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Foods World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/cfw-65-6-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The resiliency of cereal grain food systems is threatened by the agricultural degradation of natural resources. Addressing this global challenge will require us to rethink the ways in which grains are produced. An emerging farmer-led movement known as regenerative agriculture may provide a pathway to reverse the degradation of agroecosystems, with the potential to enhance food system resilience. Regenerative agriculture reimagines conventional agriculture around a holistic set of nature-based principles to restore soil health, biodiversity, and farm economics. Although a multitude of complex barriers exist for farmers to transition to regenerative systems, companies in the food and agricultural sector are beginning to develop initiatives that can support the regenerative agricultural movement. By redefining their own approaches to sustainability, these companies are charting new paths to accelerate farmer adoption of regenerative agriculture that improves socioeconomic and environmental resiliency throughout food systems. Food systems are increasingly vulnerable to disruption, which affects the price, quality, and availability of food for people worldwide. Stressors such as climate change bring both sudden shocks (e.g., catastrophic weather events) and gradually mounting pressures (e.g., shifting temperature and precipitation patterns), threatening the stable, affordable supply of staple foods like cereals and pulses (16,25,26). The current trajectory of global warming is expected to cause water scarcity and production shocks to 60% of the world’s wheat-growing area by the end of the century (27). At the same time, global demand for cereal grains is rising by nearly 1% annually (2). Although agriculture continues to increase yields, gains in cereal grain production may not be able to keep pace with growing global demand (13). Furthermore, numerous vulnerabilities that exist within the food system exacerbate the risk to global production, one of which is the continued degradation of natural resources essential to food production. Worsening trends in soil degradation (11,17), biodiversity loss (8,23), and reductions in water quality and quantity (13,19) are weakening the ability of agricultural systems to maintain or increase food production, particularly in the face of climate change (9). Restoring farm ecosystems and reversing trends in degradation of natural resources is critical to bolstering resilience in agricultural and food systems to meet the nutritional needs of a growing global population. A History of Agricultural Revolutions The problems facing agriculture did not develop overnight; they reflect a complex history punctuated by revolutions in biology and technology. The Green Revolution emerged in industrialized nations post-World War II with the promise to feed the world. It laid the foundation for the predominant industrial production model of agriculture by boosting yields through advanced varieties of wheat and rice and greater use of fertilizers and other inputs. Indeed, one of its founders, Norman Borlaug, was credited with saving over a billion lives from starvation and received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970. However, the large increase in inputs (e.g., pesticides and synthetic fertilizers) required to support massive growth in crop yields has also led to detrimental, unintended environmental effects. Later, the biotech revolution of the 1990s transformed crop genomes, inserting traits to simplify management of insect and weed pests. While these revolutions in agriculture were hailed as major successes of their time, they were and remain grounded in an industrial production paradigm that promotes high yields at the risk of soil, water, and air quality and reduced biodiversity. Industrial agriculture continues to iterate based on the same paradigm, with a more recent focus on precision technologies to improve the efficiency of agrochemical use in production systems. While important efficiency gains have been made, they are unlikely to be sufficient and may even be counterproductive to the goal of maintaining a stable, resilient food system (3). A paradigm shift away from a singular focus on industrial solutions to ecological principles as a source of agricultural innovation can help restore natural resources and build economic and ecosystem resilience in farm ecosystems (3,25). Regenerative Agriculture: An Ecological Approach Ecological approaches have been widely promoted as a key strategy for supporting agricultural and food system resilience (25). These approaches focus on restoring a farm’s natural ecosystem processes (e.g., water and nutrient cycling), as opposed to relying as much on chemical inputs. Agroecological approaches have been the foundation of a wide array of farmer-led movements globally, yet they have only recently taken hold among large-scale farms in a farmer-led movement called regenerative agriculture. Regenerative agriculture is a holistic approach to farming or ranching based on six principles for restoring agroecosystems: understanding the context of the farm or ranch, minimizing soil and ecological disturbance (e.g., tillage, pesticides, synthetic fertilizers), keeping the soil covered, maintaining living roots in the soil as long as possible throughout the year, maximizing diversity, and integrating livestock. Independently, these principles are not new to farmers. Farmers have used individual practices and parts of regenerative agriculture for decades and centuries, depending on the practice. However, singular implementation of practices like no-tillage, in many cases, have delivered limited benefits or even trade-offs, such as yield reduction (20). Regenerative agriculture holistically implements the six principles to drive additive and synergistic improvements to restore healthy farm ecosystems and reverse soil degradation, biodiversity loss, and even profitability decline Regenerative Agriculture: A Farmer-Led Initiative to Build Resiliency in Food Systems James O. Eckberg and Steven T. Rosenzweig General Mills, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A. https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065 © 2020 Cereals & Grains Association CEREAL FOODS WORLD, NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2020, VOL. 65, NO. 6 / DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065 (1,12,15,17,18). These same principles increase agroecosystem resilience. Crop diversification, for example, was recently shown to mitigate yield losses due to drought by as much as 90% in North America (4), and many others are finding similar benefits for resiliency using other combinations of regenerative principles (7,24).
再生农业:以农民为主导的建立粮食系统弹性的倡议
谷物粮食系统的复原力受到自然资源农业退化的威胁。应对这一全球性挑战需要我们重新思考粮食的生产方式。一种新兴的由农民主导的运动,即可再生农业,可能为扭转农业生态系统退化提供一条途径,并有可能增强粮食系统的抵御能力。再生农业围绕一套以自然为基础的整体原则重新构想传统农业,以恢复土壤健康、生物多样性和农业经济。尽管农民向可再生系统过渡存在许多复杂的障碍,但食品和农业部门的公司正开始制定能够支持可再生农业运动的举措。通过重新定义自己的可持续发展方法,这些公司正在绘制新的路径,以加速农民采用可再生农业,从而提高整个粮食系统的社会经济和环境弹性。粮食系统越来越容易受到破坏,这影响到世界各地人民的粮食价格、质量和可得性。气候变化等压力源既带来突然的冲击(如灾难性天气事件),也带来逐渐增加的压力(如温度和降水模式的变化),威胁到谷物和豆类等主食的稳定、可负担的供应(16,25,26)。按照目前全球变暖的趋势,预计到本世纪末,全球60%的小麦种植区将面临水资源短缺和生产冲击(27)。与此同时,全球谷物需求正以每年近1%的速度增长(2)。尽管农业继续提高产量,但谷物产量的增长可能无法跟上全球需求的增长(13)。此外,粮食系统中存在的众多脆弱性加剧了全球生产面临的风险,其中之一是粮食生产所必需的自然资源的持续退化。土壤退化(11,17)、生物多样性丧失(8,23)以及水质和水量减少(13,19)的恶化趋势正在削弱农业系统维持或增加粮食生产的能力,特别是在气候变化的情况下(9)。恢复农业生态系统和扭转自然资源退化趋势对于增强农业和粮食系统的抵御力,以满足不断增长的全球人口的营养需求至关重要。农业面临的问题不是一夜之间形成的;它们反映了一段被生物学和技术革命打断的复杂历史。第二次世界大战后,工业化国家兴起了绿色革命,承诺为世界提供粮食。通过培育小麦和水稻的先进品种,增加肥料和其他投入物的使用,提高了产量,为以农业为主导的工业化生产模式奠定了基础。事实上,它的创始人之一诺曼·博洛格(Norman Borlaug)因拯救了超过10亿人的生命而受到赞誉,并于1970年获得了诺贝尔和平奖。然而,支持作物产量大幅增长所需的大量投入(例如农药和合成肥料)也导致了有害的、意想不到的环境影响。后来,20世纪90年代的生物技术革命改变了作物基因组,插入了一些性状,简化了对害虫和杂草的管理。虽然这些农业革命被誉为当时的重大成功,但它们过去和现在都是基于一种工业生产模式,这种模式以土壤、水和空气质量以及生物多样性减少的风险来促进高产。工业化农业继续以同样的模式进行迭代,最近更加注重精密技术,以提高生产系统中农用化学品使用的效率。虽然已经取得了重要的效率提高,但它们不太可能足够,甚至可能对维持稳定、有弹性的粮食系统的目标产生反作用(3)。从单一关注工业解决方案到将生态原则作为农业创新来源的范式转变,可以帮助恢复自然资源,并在农场生态系统中建立经济和生态系统的弹性(3,25)。再生农业:生态方法生态方法作为支持农业和粮食系统恢复力的关键策略已被广泛推广(25)。这些方法侧重于恢复农场的自然生态系统过程(例如,水和养分循环),而不是过多地依赖化学投入。农业生态方法一直是全球范围内一系列农民主导运动的基础,但直到最近,它们才在农民主导的一场名为“再生农业”的运动中在大型农场中站稳脚跟。 谷物粮食系统的复原力受到自然资源农业退化的威胁。应对这一全球性挑战需要我们重新思考粮食的生产方式。一种新兴的由农民主导的运动,即可再生农业,可能为扭转农业生态系统退化提供一条途径,并有可能增强粮食系统的抵御能力。再生农业围绕一套以自然为基础的整体原则重新构想传统农业,以恢复土壤健康、生物多样性和农业经济。尽管农民向可再生系统过渡存在许多复杂的障碍,但食品和农业部门的公司正开始制定能够支持可再生农业运动的举措。通过重新定义自己的可持续发展方法,这些公司正在绘制新的路径,以加速农民采用可再生农业,从而提高整个粮食系统的社会经济和环境弹性。粮食系统越来越容易受到破坏,这影响到世界各地人民的粮食价格、质量和可得性。气候变化等压力源既带来突然的冲击(如灾难性天气事件),也带来逐渐增加的压力(如温度和降水模式的变化),威胁到谷物和豆类等主食的稳定、可负担的供应(16,25,26)。按照目前全球变暖的趋势,预计到本世纪末,全球60%的小麦种植区将面临水资源短缺和生产冲击(27)。与此同时,全球谷物需求正以每年近1%的速度增长(2)。尽管农业继续提高产量,但谷物产量的增长可能无法跟上全球需求的增长(13)。此外,粮食系统中存在的众多脆弱性加剧了全球生产面临的风险,其中之一是粮食生产所必需的自然资源的持续退化。土壤退化(11,17)、生物多样性丧失(8,23)以及水质和水量减少(13,19)的恶化趋势正在削弱农业系统维持或增加粮食生产的能力,特别是在气候变化的情况下(9)。恢复农业生态系统和扭转自然资源退化趋势对于增强农业和粮食系统的抵御力,以满足不断增长的全球人口的营养需求至关重要。农业面临的问题不是一夜之间形成的;它们反映了一段被生物学和技术革命打断的复杂历史。第二次世界大战后,工业化国家兴起了绿色革命,承诺为世界提供粮食。通过培育小麦和水稻的先进品种,增加肥料和其他投入物的使用,提高了产量,为以农业为主导的工业化生产模式奠定了基础。事实上,它的创始人之一诺曼·博洛格(Norman Borlaug)因拯救了超过10亿人的生命而受到赞誉,并于1970年获得了诺贝尔和平奖。然而,支持作物产量大幅增长所需的大量投入(例如农药和合成肥料)也导致了有害的、意想不到的环境影响。后来,20世纪90年代的生物技术革命改变了作物基因组,插入了一些性状,简化了对害虫和杂草的管理。虽然这些农业革命被誉为当时的重大成功,但它们过去和现在都是基于一种工业生产模式,这种模式以土壤、水和空气质量以及生物多样性减少的风险来促进高产。工业化农业继续以同样的模式进行迭代,最近更加注重精密技术,以提高生产系统中农用化学品使用的效率。虽然已经取得了重要的效率提高,但它们不太可能足够,甚至可能对维持稳定、有弹性的粮食系统的目标产生反作用(3)。从单一关注工业解决方案到将生态原则作为农业创新来源的范式转变,可以帮助恢复自然资源,并在农场生态系统中建立经济和生态系统的弹性(3,25)。再生农业:生态方法生态方法作为支持农业和粮食系统恢复力的关键策略已被广泛推广(25)。这些方法侧重于恢复农场的自然生态系统过程(例如,水和养分循环),而不是过多地依赖化学投入。农业生态方法一直是全球范围内一系列农民主导运动的基础,但直到最近,它们才在农民主导的一场名为“再生农业”的运动中在大型农场中站稳脚跟。 再生农业是一种全面的农业或牧场方法,基于恢复农业生态系统的六项原则:了解农场或牧场的环境,最大限度地减少土壤和生态干扰(例如,耕作、农药、合成肥料),保持土壤覆盖,全年尽可能长时间地保持土壤中的活根,最大限度地提高多样性,以及整合牲畜。独立而言,这些原则对农民来说并不新鲜。几十年和几个世纪以来,农民根据不同的做法,使用了个别的做法和部分的再生农业。然而,在许多情况下,单一实施免耕等做法只带来了有限的好处,甚至带来了减产等损失(20)。再生农业从整体上实施了六项原则,以推动添加剂和协同改进,恢复健康的农场生态系统,扭转土壤退化、生物多样性丧失甚至盈利能力下降的趋势。詹姆斯O.埃克伯格和史蒂文T.罗森茨威格通用磨坊,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州,美国https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065©2020谷物和谷物协会谷物食品世界,2020年11月至12月,第65卷,NO。6 / DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065(1,12,15,17,18)。这些相同的原则提高了农业生态系统的恢复力。例如,最近的研究表明,在北美,作物多样化可以减少多达90%的干旱造成的产量损失(4),许多其他国家也在利用再生原则的其他组合发现类似的抗灾效益(7,24)。 再生农业是一种全面的农业或牧场方法,基于恢复农业生态系统的六项原则:了解农场或牧场的环境,最大限度地减少土壤和生态干扰(例如,耕作、农药、合成肥料),保持土壤覆盖,全年尽可能长时间地保持土壤中的活根,最大限度地提高多样性,以及整合牲畜。独立而言,这些原则对农民来说并不新鲜。几十年和几个世纪以来,农民根据不同的做法,使用了个别的做法和部分的再生农业。然而,在许多情况下,单一实施免耕等做法只带来了有限的好处,甚至带来了减产等损失(20)。再生农业从整体上实施了六项原则,以推动添加剂和协同改进,恢复健康的农场生态系统,扭转土壤退化、生物多样性丧失甚至盈利能力下降的趋势。詹姆斯O.埃克伯格和史蒂文T.罗森茨威格通用磨坊,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州,美国https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065©2020谷物和谷物协会谷物食品世界,2020年11月至12月,第65卷,NO。6 / DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0065(1,12,15,17,18)。这些相同的原则提高了农业生态系统的恢复力。例如,最近的研究表明,在北美,作物多样化可以减少多达90%的干旱造成的产量损失(4),许多其他国家也在利用再生原则的其他组合发现类似的抗灾效益(7,24)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。