The Ethics of Cord Blood Banking in Light of Ownership, Informed Consent, and Solidarity

E. Salvaterra, L. Lecchi, Sarah Gobbi, P. Rebulla
{"title":"The Ethics of Cord Blood Banking in Light of Ownership, Informed Consent, and Solidarity","authors":"E. Salvaterra, L. Lecchi, Sarah Gobbi, P. Rebulla","doi":"10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Umbilical cord blood banking raises several issues in legal and ethical terms, from the determination of ownership of biological material to the respect of the right of self determination–namely, the right to give an informed consent–of the individuals involved (newborn, parents), to the commercialization of cord blood banks and to the related autologous use of donated placental blood. Recently these issues have been considered by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (EGE) in the Opinion on “Ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking” (Opinion No. 19 of 16 March 2004). They have also been part of a wide and intense international debate. This paper aims at examining these themes–ownership, informed consent, and commercialization of cord blood banking–with particular regard to the EGE Opinion on the ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking. Such opinion focuses on private cord blood banks for autologous use and underlines the legitimacy conditio...","PeriodicalId":51233,"journal":{"name":"Cell Preservation Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Preservation Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood banking raises several issues in legal and ethical terms, from the determination of ownership of biological material to the respect of the right of self determination–namely, the right to give an informed consent–of the individuals involved (newborn, parents), to the commercialization of cord blood banks and to the related autologous use of donated placental blood. Recently these issues have been considered by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (EGE) in the Opinion on “Ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking” (Opinion No. 19 of 16 March 2004). They have also been part of a wide and intense international debate. This paper aims at examining these themes–ownership, informed consent, and commercialization of cord blood banking–with particular regard to the EGE Opinion on the ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking. Such opinion focuses on private cord blood banks for autologous use and underlines the legitimacy conditio...
从所有权、知情同意和团结的角度看脐带血银行的伦理
脐带血银行在法律和伦理方面提出了几个问题,从确定生物材料的所有权到尊重自我决定的权利,即给予相关个人(新生儿、父母)知情同意的权利,到脐带血银行的商业化以及捐赠的胎盘血的相关自体使用。最近,欧洲科学和新技术伦理小组在关于“脐带血银行的伦理问题”的意见(2004年3月16日第19号意见)中向欧洲委员会审议了这些问题。它们也成为广泛而激烈的国际辩论的一部分。本文旨在研究这些主题——所有权、知情同意和脐带血库的商业化——特别是关于脐带血库伦理方面的EGE意见。这种意见侧重于用于自体使用的私人脐带血银行,并强调了其合法性条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信