Paradigms Lost: The New Ethnography and the New Linguistics

R. Keesing
{"title":"Paradigms Lost: The New Ethnography and the New Linguistics","authors":"R. Keesing","doi":"10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methodological premises and analytical models of \"the new ethnography\" represent an extension to cultural phenomena of the paradigm of pre-transformational linguistics. Thus \"ethnoscience\" has emphasized emic descriptions of cultural uniqueness, discovery procedures, phonological models, and a finite corpus. The linguistic foundations of these approaches to culture have been pulled away by the newer transformational paradigm. The implications of the new linguistics for cognitive anthropology are traced, and it is suggested that development of a more powerful anthropological paradigm could contribute to solving the dilemmas of the linguistic frontier.","PeriodicalId":85570,"journal":{"name":"Southwestern journal of anthropology","volume":"28 1","pages":"299 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629315","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southwestern journal of anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The methodological premises and analytical models of "the new ethnography" represent an extension to cultural phenomena of the paradigm of pre-transformational linguistics. Thus "ethnoscience" has emphasized emic descriptions of cultural uniqueness, discovery procedures, phonological models, and a finite corpus. The linguistic foundations of these approaches to culture have been pulled away by the newer transformational paradigm. The implications of the new linguistics for cognitive anthropology are traced, and it is suggested that development of a more powerful anthropological paradigm could contribute to solving the dilemmas of the linguistic frontier.
范式的迷失:新民族志与新语言学
“新民族志”的方法论前提和分析模式是对前转型语言学范式的文化现象的延伸。因此,“民族科学”强调对文化独特性、发现过程、语音模型和有限语料库的主题描述。这些文化研究方法的语言学基础已经被新的转型范式所抛弃。本文对新语言学对认知人类学的影响进行了追溯,并提出了一种更强大的人类学范式的发展可能有助于解决语言学前沿的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信