Getting Normative: The Role of Natural Rights in Constitutional Adjudication

Randy E. Barnett
{"title":"Getting Normative: The Role of Natural Rights in Constitutional Adjudication","authors":"Randy E. Barnett","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are in the midst of a natural law revival. Not since the Hart-Fuller debate2 in the wake of Nuremberg has legal academia witnessed such interest in the topics of natural law and natural rights.3 While this development may be only the most recent aspect of the now several decades old revival of normative legal philosophy that I chronicled some ten years ago,4 the immediate cause of this interest was, of course, the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. The","PeriodicalId":81001,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional commentary","volume":"12 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We are in the midst of a natural law revival. Not since the Hart-Fuller debate2 in the wake of Nuremberg has legal academia witnessed such interest in the topics of natural law and natural rights.3 While this development may be only the most recent aspect of the now several decades old revival of normative legal philosophy that I chronicled some ten years ago,4 the immediate cause of this interest was, of course, the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. The
走向规范:自然权利在宪法裁判中的作用
我们正处于自然法则的复兴之中。自从纽伦堡审判之后的哈特-富勒之争以来,法律界还没有看到人们对自然法和自然权利的话题如此感兴趣虽然这种发展可能只是规范法律哲学几十年来的复兴的最新方面,但这种兴趣的直接原因当然是克拉伦斯·托马斯被提名为美国最高法院大法官。的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信