Improving quality in school mental health

S. Stephan, E. Connors, A. Blizzard
{"title":"Improving quality in school mental health","authors":"S. Stephan, E. Connors, A. Blizzard","doi":"10.1080/1754730X.2015.1053699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School mental health (SMH) quality assessment and improvement has been a primary overarching theme of this journal since its inception. In recent decades, dimensions of SMH quality have moved beyond bureaucratic processes (e.g. credentialing, adherence to paperwork requirements) and/or liability protection (e.g. procedures for handling crises) toward better articulated and perhaps nuanced dimensions including: (a) quality of stakeholder involvement in program development, guidance, evaluation and continuous improvement; (b) quality of collaborative relations among families, school staff and community providers; (c) the range of preventive and treatment services provided; (d) productivity of staff; (e) quality of training and supervision of staff; (f) team building and service coordination; (g) emphasis on evidence-based prevention and intervention; (h) cultural responsiveness of interventions; (i) use of appropriate evaluation strategies; (j) use of evaluation findings to continuously improve programs and services and (k) connecting evaluation findings to advocacy and policy improvement agendas (Ambrose, Weist, Schaeffer, Nabors, & Hill, 2002; Evans, Sapia, Axelrod, & Glomb, 2002; Nabors, Lehmkuhl, & Weist, 2003; President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003). Simultaneously, systems for measuring SMH quality have evolved, with several measures being developed to help schools and their broader authorities (e.g. school districts) assess and monitor progress (e.g. School Mental Health Quality Assessment Questionnaire, Weist, Stephan, Lever, Moore, & Lewis, 2006; Mental Health Planning and Evaluation Template, National Assembly on School-based Health Care, 2010; School Mental Health Capacity Instrument, Feigenberg, Watts, & Buckner, 2010). Access to and quality of school-based health services vary greatly at all local and state levels across the United States, with many youth unable to access high-quality services. In 2014, two national leaders in school health, the national Center for School Mental Health (CSMH, http://csmh.umaryland.edu) and the School-Based Health Alliance (www. sbh4all.org), were charged by the federal Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration with further advancing quality and sustainability efforts across the country. The $2.8 million 4-year cooperative agreement will support the efforts of partnering organizations’ to improve the quality of care delivered by school-based health centres (SBHCs) and comprehensive school mental health systems (CSMHSs) nationwide. Specific project activities include:","PeriodicalId":89653,"journal":{"name":"Advances in school mental health promotion","volume":"8 1","pages":"121 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1754730X.2015.1053699","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in school mental health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2015.1053699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

School mental health (SMH) quality assessment and improvement has been a primary overarching theme of this journal since its inception. In recent decades, dimensions of SMH quality have moved beyond bureaucratic processes (e.g. credentialing, adherence to paperwork requirements) and/or liability protection (e.g. procedures for handling crises) toward better articulated and perhaps nuanced dimensions including: (a) quality of stakeholder involvement in program development, guidance, evaluation and continuous improvement; (b) quality of collaborative relations among families, school staff and community providers; (c) the range of preventive and treatment services provided; (d) productivity of staff; (e) quality of training and supervision of staff; (f) team building and service coordination; (g) emphasis on evidence-based prevention and intervention; (h) cultural responsiveness of interventions; (i) use of appropriate evaluation strategies; (j) use of evaluation findings to continuously improve programs and services and (k) connecting evaluation findings to advocacy and policy improvement agendas (Ambrose, Weist, Schaeffer, Nabors, & Hill, 2002; Evans, Sapia, Axelrod, & Glomb, 2002; Nabors, Lehmkuhl, & Weist, 2003; President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003). Simultaneously, systems for measuring SMH quality have evolved, with several measures being developed to help schools and their broader authorities (e.g. school districts) assess and monitor progress (e.g. School Mental Health Quality Assessment Questionnaire, Weist, Stephan, Lever, Moore, & Lewis, 2006; Mental Health Planning and Evaluation Template, National Assembly on School-based Health Care, 2010; School Mental Health Capacity Instrument, Feigenberg, Watts, & Buckner, 2010). Access to and quality of school-based health services vary greatly at all local and state levels across the United States, with many youth unable to access high-quality services. In 2014, two national leaders in school health, the national Center for School Mental Health (CSMH, http://csmh.umaryland.edu) and the School-Based Health Alliance (www. sbh4all.org), were charged by the federal Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration with further advancing quality and sustainability efforts across the country. The $2.8 million 4-year cooperative agreement will support the efforts of partnering organizations’ to improve the quality of care delivered by school-based health centres (SBHCs) and comprehensive school mental health systems (CSMHSs) nationwide. Specific project activities include:
提高学校心理健康质量
自创办以来,学校心理健康(SMH)质量评估和改进一直是本刊的首要主题。近几十年来,SMH质量的维度已经超越了官僚程序(例如,认证,遵守文书要求)和/或责任保护(例如,处理危机的程序),转向更好地表达和可能微妙的维度,包括:(a)利益相关者参与项目开发、指导、评估和持续改进的质量;(b)家庭、学校职员和社区提供者之间的合作关系的质素;(c)提供的预防和治疗服务的范围;(d)工作人员的生产力;(e)工作人员的培训和监督的质量;(f)队伍建设和服务协调;(g)强调以证据为基础的预防和干预;(h)干预措施的文化响应性;(i)使用适当的评价策略;(j)利用评估结果不断改进项目和服务;(k)将评估结果与宣传和政策改进议程联系起来(Ambrose, Weist, Schaeffer, Nabors, & Hill, 2002;Evans, Sapia, Axelrod, & Glomb, 2002;Nabors, Lehmkuhl, & Weist, 2003;总统新精神健康自由委员会,2003年)。与此同时,衡量家庭健康质量的系统也在不断发展,一些措施正在开发中,以帮助学校及其更广泛的当局(如学区)评估和监测进展(例如,学校心理健康质量评估问卷,Weist, Stephan, Lever, Moore, & Lewis, 2006;心理健康规划和评价模板,全国校本保健大会,2010年;学校心理健康能力量表(Feigenberg, Watts, & Buckner, 2010)。在美国各地的地方和州各级,获得校本保健服务的机会和质量差别很大,许多青年无法获得高质量的服务。2014年,学校健康的两个国家领导者,国家学校心理健康中心(CSMH, http://csmh.umaryland.edu)和学校健康联盟(www。shbh4all.org),由联邦卫生和人类服务部、卫生资源和服务管理局负责进一步推进全国范围内的质量和可持续性工作。这项价值280万美元的4年合作协议将支持合作组织在全国范围内提高校本卫生中心和综合学校精神卫生系统提供的护理质量。具体项目活动包括:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书