Analysis of Fatalities During Maintenance and Repair Operations in the U.S. Mining Sector.

Leanna M Reardon, John R Heberger, Patrick G Dempsey
{"title":"Analysis of Fatalities During Maintenance and Repair Operations in the U.S. Mining Sector.","authors":"Leanna M Reardon, John R Heberger, Patrick G Dempsey","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2014.911222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintenance and repair work in mining is particularly hazardous and yet has received little focus in ergonomics research.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this article, an attempt has been made to determine if patterns can be identified to categorize maintenance and repair fatalities in mining, to compare occurrence of fatalities between coal and metal/nonmetal sectors, and to use this information to identify safety deficiencies and associated proposed remedial measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A classification scheme was developed to identify patterns in fatalities, including proximal causes, tasks, and contributing factors. This scheme was tested to ensure adequacy of the categories, and fatalities were categorized using the scheme. All testing and categorization were done by two of the authors to ensure reliability of the coding scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patterns were successfully identified to categorize the fatalities, and these patterns were different between coal and metal/nonmetal mines. Coal mines had a greater proportion of electrical-related fatalities, while more fatalities related to potential energy occurred at metal/nonmetal mines. Most of the fatalities were caused by the victim coming into contact with an object or machine or the victim falling from height, and they occurred most often while the victim was performing maintenance or repair on equipment, cleaning, or removing blockages. The most frequent factors contributing to these incidents were failure to properly de-energize or lock out/tag out equipment, violation of work procedures, missing or inadequate safety equipment, and failure to block equipment properly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The classification approach used was successful in identifying hazard patterns during maintenance and repair fatalities in mining. These patterns identify areas to focus attention when developing interventions to prevent the occurrence of future fatalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2014.911222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maintenance and repair work in mining is particularly hazardous and yet has received little focus in ergonomics research.

Purpose: In this article, an attempt has been made to determine if patterns can be identified to categorize maintenance and repair fatalities in mining, to compare occurrence of fatalities between coal and metal/nonmetal sectors, and to use this information to identify safety deficiencies and associated proposed remedial measures.

Methods: A classification scheme was developed to identify patterns in fatalities, including proximal causes, tasks, and contributing factors. This scheme was tested to ensure adequacy of the categories, and fatalities were categorized using the scheme. All testing and categorization were done by two of the authors to ensure reliability of the coding scheme.

Results: Patterns were successfully identified to categorize the fatalities, and these patterns were different between coal and metal/nonmetal mines. Coal mines had a greater proportion of electrical-related fatalities, while more fatalities related to potential energy occurred at metal/nonmetal mines. Most of the fatalities were caused by the victim coming into contact with an object or machine or the victim falling from height, and they occurred most often while the victim was performing maintenance or repair on equipment, cleaning, or removing blockages. The most frequent factors contributing to these incidents were failure to properly de-energize or lock out/tag out equipment, violation of work procedures, missing or inadequate safety equipment, and failure to block equipment properly.

Conclusions: The classification approach used was successful in identifying hazard patterns during maintenance and repair fatalities in mining. These patterns identify areas to focus attention when developing interventions to prevent the occurrence of future fatalities.

美国采矿业维护和修理作业期间的死亡事故分析。
背景:目的:本文试图确定能否找出矿业中维护和修理死亡事故的分类模式,比较煤炭行业和金属/非金属行业的死亡事故发生情况,并利用这些信息找出安全缺陷和相关的建议补救措施:方法:制定了一个分类方案,以确定死亡事故的模式,包括近因、任务和诱因。为确保分类的适当性,对该方案进行了测试,并使用该方案对死亡事故进行了分类。所有测试和分类均由两位作者完成,以确保编码方案的可靠性:成功确定了死亡事故的分类模式,这些模式在煤矿和金属/非金属矿之间有所不同。煤矿中与电气有关的死亡事故比例较高,而金属/非金属矿中与势能有关的死亡事故较多。大多数死亡事故都是由于受害者接触到物体或机器,或从高处坠落造成的,而且最常发生在受害者对设备进行维护或修理、清洁或清除堵塞物时。导致这些事故发生的最常见因素是未正确断电或锁定/挂牌停用设备、违反工作程序、缺少安全设备或安全设备不足,以及未正确封堵设备:所使用的分类方法成功地识别了矿业维护和修理致命事故中的危险模式。这些模式确定了在制定干预措施以防止今后发生死亡事故时需要重点关注的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信