The Victor's Crown: How the Birth of the Olympics and the Rise of the Roman Games Changed Sport for Ever

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q1 HISTORY
Fernando García Romero
{"title":"The Victor's Crown: How the Birth of the Olympics and the Rise of the Roman Games Changed Sport for Ever","authors":"Fernando García Romero","doi":"10.1080/09523367.2015.1043070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"introduction of the volley, and the vehement opposition to the initial implementation of the lob. Lake skilfully evaluates how these seemingly innocuous ‘new’ types of play sat within, whilst also helping to (re)produce, the broader contexts of: amateurism versus professionalism, the ‘place’ and ‘role’ of women within the sport, and the levels of etiquette considered synonymous with the social elite. The foremost strength here, aside from the broad scope and extensive research, was the critical, sociological edge to the writing. Shining through each chapter was the genuine desire to highlight social issues throughout the history of tennis, whilst evoking comparisons with contemporary manifestations and seeking to challenge the authorities, hoping for change. Indicative of this was the ongoing analysis of the persistent elitist ideology, which continues to shape participation and talent development in tennis, or, for a more specific example, the treatment and public perception of Althea Gibson during the 1950s (Chapter 15), which instantly called to mind the lamentably similar treatment and perception of Serena Williams more than 50 years later. The countless similar examples throughout the text represent the paradox found in so many of Britain’s popular sporting pastimes; the heritage and tradition intertwined with the outdated views and long-standing, discriminating practices. This highlights how the book is not just painting a picture, there is a serious rationale behind many of the arguments constructed; which is epitomized by the parting shot in the conclusion aimed towards the tennis authorities, not least the Lawn Tennis Association, regarding their policies, specifically concerning their lack of action relating to many pertinent social and cultural problems that endure within the sport. Whilst tennis has had ample attention in sports history literature, there has remained a conspicuous absence of such a sustained, comprehensive volume on tennis. There is now an essential account for anyone considering embarking on a study on tennis. Also, anyone giving serious consideration to issues of gender, class, or ethnicity in Britain’s social history will also benefit from this work, and find the vivid examples and fervent discussions within the tennis context valuable. These elements all helped to capture the imagination and retain the attention, which made for a genuinely gratifying read. There is no jargon or dwelling on unnecessary detail; so the book remains suitable for any reader and will engross the historian, the sociologist, and the tennis enthusiast equally.","PeriodicalId":47491,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the History of Sport","volume":"32 1","pages":"1221 - 1224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09523367.2015.1043070","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the History of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2015.1043070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

introduction of the volley, and the vehement opposition to the initial implementation of the lob. Lake skilfully evaluates how these seemingly innocuous ‘new’ types of play sat within, whilst also helping to (re)produce, the broader contexts of: amateurism versus professionalism, the ‘place’ and ‘role’ of women within the sport, and the levels of etiquette considered synonymous with the social elite. The foremost strength here, aside from the broad scope and extensive research, was the critical, sociological edge to the writing. Shining through each chapter was the genuine desire to highlight social issues throughout the history of tennis, whilst evoking comparisons with contemporary manifestations and seeking to challenge the authorities, hoping for change. Indicative of this was the ongoing analysis of the persistent elitist ideology, which continues to shape participation and talent development in tennis, or, for a more specific example, the treatment and public perception of Althea Gibson during the 1950s (Chapter 15), which instantly called to mind the lamentably similar treatment and perception of Serena Williams more than 50 years later. The countless similar examples throughout the text represent the paradox found in so many of Britain’s popular sporting pastimes; the heritage and tradition intertwined with the outdated views and long-standing, discriminating practices. This highlights how the book is not just painting a picture, there is a serious rationale behind many of the arguments constructed; which is epitomized by the parting shot in the conclusion aimed towards the tennis authorities, not least the Lawn Tennis Association, regarding their policies, specifically concerning their lack of action relating to many pertinent social and cultural problems that endure within the sport. Whilst tennis has had ample attention in sports history literature, there has remained a conspicuous absence of such a sustained, comprehensive volume on tennis. There is now an essential account for anyone considering embarking on a study on tennis. Also, anyone giving serious consideration to issues of gender, class, or ethnicity in Britain’s social history will also benefit from this work, and find the vivid examples and fervent discussions within the tennis context valuable. These elements all helped to capture the imagination and retain the attention, which made for a genuinely gratifying read. There is no jargon or dwelling on unnecessary detail; so the book remains suitable for any reader and will engross the historian, the sociologist, and the tennis enthusiast equally.
《胜者的王冠:奥林匹克的诞生和罗马运动会的兴起如何永远地改变了体育运动》
引进凌空截击,并极力反对最初实施的吊球。Lake巧妙地评估了这些看似无害的“新”类型的游戏是如何存在的,同时也帮助(重新)产生了更广泛的背景:业余与专业,女性在运动中的“位置”和“角色”,以及被认为是社会精英代名词的礼仪水平。除了广泛的范围和广泛的研究之外,本书最重要的优势是写作的批判性和社会学边缘。在每一章中都闪耀着真正的愿望,即突出网球历史上的社会问题,同时唤起与当代表现的比较,并寻求挑战当局,希望改变。表明这一点的是对持续存在的精英主义意识形态的持续分析,这种意识形态继续影响着网球运动的参与和人才发展,或者,更具体的例子是,20世纪50年代对阿尔西娅·吉布森的待遇和公众看法(第15章),这立即让人想起50多年后对塞雷娜·威廉姆斯的可悲的类似待遇和看法。全书中无数类似的例子代表了在英国许多流行的体育消遣中发现的悖论;遗产和传统与过时的观点和长期存在的歧视性做法交织在一起。这突出表明,这本书不仅仅是在描绘一幅图画,许多论点背后都有一个严肃的理由;结论中针对网球当局,尤其是草地网球协会的政策,特别是他们在运动中存在的许多相关的社会和文化问题上缺乏行动,这是一个缩影。虽然网球在体育历史文献中得到了充分的关注,但在网球方面却明显缺乏这样一部持续、全面的著作。现在,对于任何考虑着手研究网球的人来说,都有一本必不可少的书。此外,任何认真考虑英国社会历史上的性别、阶级或种族问题的人也会从这本书中受益,并发现网球背景下生动的例子和热烈的讨论是有价值的。这些元素都有助于捕捉想象力和保持注意力,这是一个真正令人满意的阅读。没有行话,也没有不必要的细节;因此,这本书仍然适合任何读者,历史学家、社会学家和网球爱好者都会同样着迷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信