Kohut Memorial Lecture: Race, Place, and Selfie

T. Philips
{"title":"Kohut Memorial Lecture: Race, Place, and Selfie","authors":"T. Philips","doi":"10.1080/15551024.2016.1141601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We live in a “selfie” culture. We are now able, by the merest touch, to put ourselves into a picture. Kohut understood that in order to be mirrored or empathically responded to in any way we needed to be seen. I reflect on how Kohut’s work of selfobject longings is strangely true in today’s world, even though he could not have anticipated to what degree technology would bear it out. His theory is a nuanced, multi-layered exegesis on this theme. This article is about Kohut viewed through the lens of current times. As it is a subjective view, along the way you will hear how Kohut’s theories impacted my own analysis and hear how and why Russell Meares was instrumental in bringing Kohut’s ideas to Australia. My South African racial past was not discussed in my 14-year analysis. I note and speculate on the absence of race in Kohut’s theorizing and show how the Internet influenced my need to examine my racial past after apartheid ended and how valuable Kohut’s theories were in that regard. I conclude by reflecting on Kohut’s contribution by relating it to the significance of social media, then and now.","PeriodicalId":91515,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychoanalytic self psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15551024.2016.1141601","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychoanalytic self psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2016.1141601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We live in a “selfie” culture. We are now able, by the merest touch, to put ourselves into a picture. Kohut understood that in order to be mirrored or empathically responded to in any way we needed to be seen. I reflect on how Kohut’s work of selfobject longings is strangely true in today’s world, even though he could not have anticipated to what degree technology would bear it out. His theory is a nuanced, multi-layered exegesis on this theme. This article is about Kohut viewed through the lens of current times. As it is a subjective view, along the way you will hear how Kohut’s theories impacted my own analysis and hear how and why Russell Meares was instrumental in bringing Kohut’s ideas to Australia. My South African racial past was not discussed in my 14-year analysis. I note and speculate on the absence of race in Kohut’s theorizing and show how the Internet influenced my need to examine my racial past after apartheid ended and how valuable Kohut’s theories were in that regard. I conclude by reflecting on Kohut’s contribution by relating it to the significance of social media, then and now.
科胡特纪念讲座:种族、地点和自拍
我们生活在“自拍”文化中。现在,只要轻轻一触,我们就能把自己融入一幅画中。科胡特明白,为了以任何方式被反映或同情地回应,我们需要被看到。我思考着科胡特关于自我客体渴望的作品在今天的世界中是多么奇怪地真实,尽管他无法预料到技术会在多大程度上证明这一点。他的理论是对这个主题细致入微,多层次的注释。这篇文章是通过当前时代的视角来看待Kohut的。由于这是一个主观的观点,一路上你会听到科胡特的理论如何影响我自己的分析,以及罗素·米尔斯如何以及为什么在将科胡特的思想带到澳大利亚方面发挥了重要作用。在我长达14年的分析中,我的南非种族历史并没有被提及。我注意到并推测科胡特的理论中没有种族因素,并展示了互联网是如何影响我在种族隔离结束后审视自己种族过去的需要的,以及科胡特的理论在这方面是多么有价值。最后,我将反思Kohut的贡献,将其与社交媒体的重要性联系起来,无论是当时还是现在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信