Who is Really in Charge of Contemporary Education? People and technologies in, against and beyond the neoliberal university

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Sarah Hayes, P. Jandrić
{"title":"Who is Really in Charge of Contemporary Education? People and technologies in, against and beyond the neoliberal university","authors":"Sarah Hayes, P. Jandrić","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2014.989899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reflects on the position of people in, against and beyond information and communication technologies. Firstly, using Jandrić and Kuzmanić’s work on digital postcolonialism, Raymond Williams's work on residual and emergent cultures, and Deleuze and Guattari's insights into the dynamics between territorialization, de-territorialization and re-territorialization, it develops a theoretical framework for inquiry into the hybrid identity of the contemporary university. Then, through critical discourse analysis (CDA), the article moves on to analyse the ways in which technology discourse resides in the dominating ideology of technological determinism and co-opts with neoliberal agendas by omitting humans from explicit mention in UK policy documents. It shows that true counter-hegemonic practice against dominating social practices is possible only through reinvigorating the central position of human beings in regards to information and communication technologies. Within the developed theoretical framework, it seeks openings to intervene subversively into current relationships between technologies, people, and (higher) education, and to identify opportunities for building a non-determinist identity of the contemporary university that reaches beyond the single-minded logic of techno-scientific development. In the process, it situates Paulo Freire's insights into critical pedagogy in the context of the network society, and places the relationships between human beings, language and information and communication technologies amongst central questions of today's (higher) education and society at large.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2014.989899","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.989899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Abstract This article reflects on the position of people in, against and beyond information and communication technologies. Firstly, using Jandrić and Kuzmanić’s work on digital postcolonialism, Raymond Williams's work on residual and emergent cultures, and Deleuze and Guattari's insights into the dynamics between territorialization, de-territorialization and re-territorialization, it develops a theoretical framework for inquiry into the hybrid identity of the contemporary university. Then, through critical discourse analysis (CDA), the article moves on to analyse the ways in which technology discourse resides in the dominating ideology of technological determinism and co-opts with neoliberal agendas by omitting humans from explicit mention in UK policy documents. It shows that true counter-hegemonic practice against dominating social practices is possible only through reinvigorating the central position of human beings in regards to information and communication technologies. Within the developed theoretical framework, it seeks openings to intervene subversively into current relationships between technologies, people, and (higher) education, and to identify opportunities for building a non-determinist identity of the contemporary university that reaches beyond the single-minded logic of techno-scientific development. In the process, it situates Paulo Freire's insights into critical pedagogy in the context of the network society, and places the relationships between human beings, language and information and communication technologies amongst central questions of today's (higher) education and society at large.
谁才是当代教育的真正主人?新自由主义大学里、反对和超越的人和技术
摘要本文反思了人们在信息通信技术中、在信息通信技术中、在信息通信技术之外所处的位置。首先,利用扬德里奇和库兹曼尼奇关于数字后殖民主义的研究成果、雷蒙德·威廉姆斯关于残余文化和新兴文化的研究成果,以及德勒兹和瓜塔里关于属地化、去属地化和再属地化之间动态关系的见解,构建了一个探讨当代大学混合身份的理论框架。然后,通过批判性话语分析(CDA),本文继续分析技术话语驻留在技术决定论的主导意识形态中的方式,并通过在英国政策文件中明确提及人类而与新自由主义议程合作。它表明,只有通过重新激活人类在信息和通信技术方面的中心地位,才能真正实现反对主导社会实践的反霸权实践。在发达的理论框架内,它寻求机会颠覆性地干预技术、人与(高等)教育之间的当前关系,并确定建立当代大学的非决定论身份的机会,超越技术-科学发展的单一逻辑。在这个过程中,它将保罗·弗莱雷对网络社会背景下批判教学法的见解置于位置,并将人类、语言、信息和通信技术之间的关系置于当今(高等)教育和整个社会的核心问题之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Review of Educational Research
Open Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信