{"title":"The Advent of Noo-politics in Ibsen’s Problem Plays","authors":"Anders Skare Malvik","doi":"10.1080/15021866.2015.1087714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literary history is often seen in the light of the history of ideas, and rarely as corresponding to the media technologies that transmit these ideas. It would, however, be difficult to explain the international success of the Norwegian “Modern Breakthrough authors” without taking into account the transnational mediation of the political, social, philosophical, and esthetic ideas of the period. “The Modern Breakthrough” in Norwegian literature is not just a response to Georg Brandes’ 1871 call to arms. It is also an esthetic response to a media technological revolution that radically changed Norwegian society in the second half of the nineteenth century. As media historians Henrik G. Bastiansen and Hans Fredrik Dahl have emphasized, the years of Ibsen’s literary production delineates an epoch of faster and more powerful media developments than ever before in history. Catilina (1950) was published four years before Norway got its first railroad. When We Dead Awaken (1899) was written in Arbien’s Street in Kristiana, while they were screening cinema shows down the street (Bastiansen and Dahl 2003a). The railroad, telegraph, photography, film, phonograph, and telephone all surface in Norway within this short period of less than 50 years. These technologies dramatically changed the scales and patterns of human interaction during Ibsen’s time, and it would be naïve to think that the playwright did not in some way chart their societal impact. But how do we read Ibsen from a media perspective? The aim of this article is to show how Ibsen’s problem plays respond to the rise of the newspaper industry in late nineteenth","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2015.1087714","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2015.1087714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Literary history is often seen in the light of the history of ideas, and rarely as corresponding to the media technologies that transmit these ideas. It would, however, be difficult to explain the international success of the Norwegian “Modern Breakthrough authors” without taking into account the transnational mediation of the political, social, philosophical, and esthetic ideas of the period. “The Modern Breakthrough” in Norwegian literature is not just a response to Georg Brandes’ 1871 call to arms. It is also an esthetic response to a media technological revolution that radically changed Norwegian society in the second half of the nineteenth century. As media historians Henrik G. Bastiansen and Hans Fredrik Dahl have emphasized, the years of Ibsen’s literary production delineates an epoch of faster and more powerful media developments than ever before in history. Catilina (1950) was published four years before Norway got its first railroad. When We Dead Awaken (1899) was written in Arbien’s Street in Kristiana, while they were screening cinema shows down the street (Bastiansen and Dahl 2003a). The railroad, telegraph, photography, film, phonograph, and telephone all surface in Norway within this short period of less than 50 years. These technologies dramatically changed the scales and patterns of human interaction during Ibsen’s time, and it would be naïve to think that the playwright did not in some way chart their societal impact. But how do we read Ibsen from a media perspective? The aim of this article is to show how Ibsen’s problem plays respond to the rise of the newspaper industry in late nineteenth
文学史通常被视为思想史,而很少与传播这些思想的媒介技术相对应。然而,如果不考虑到这一时期政治、社会、哲学和美学思想的跨国调解,就很难解释挪威“现代突破作家”在国际上的成功。挪威文学的“现代突破”不仅仅是对乔治·布兰德斯1871年号召战斗的回应。这也是对19世纪下半叶从根本上改变挪威社会的媒体技术革命的美学回应。正如媒体历史学家亨里克·g·巴斯蒂安森和汉斯·弗雷德里克·达尔所强调的那样,易卜生的文学创作描绘了一个比历史上任何时候都更快、更强大的媒体发展时代。《卡蒂琳娜》(1950)出版的四年后,挪威建成了第一条铁路。《当我们死去,觉醒》(1899)是在克里斯蒂安娜的阿比恩街创作的,当时他们正在街上放映电影(Bastiansen and Dahl 2003a)。铁路、电报、摄影、电影、留声机和电话都在这不到50年的短时间内出现在挪威。在易卜生的时代,这些技术极大地改变了人类互动的规模和模式,认为剧作家没有以某种方式描绘出它们的社会影响是naïve。但是,我们如何从媒体的角度来解读易卜生呢?本文旨在探讨易卜生的问题剧如何回应19世纪末报业的兴起