Guest Editor's Introduction

George E. Higgins
{"title":"Guest Editor's Introduction","authors":"George E. Higgins","doi":"10.1080/15332586.2011.581507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School violence is an important issue in contemporary society. School violence is a conglomeration of several different behaviors that include physical fighting, feeling unsafe, carrying a weapon, and being threatened or injured with a weapon on school property. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) reported that 11% of students were involved in physical fighting, 5% of students felt unsafe at school or on their way to school, 5.6% of students carried a weapon (i.e., knife, gun, or club), and 7.7% of students were threatened or injured with a weapon on school property in 2009 in Grades 9–12. Robers, Zhang, Truman, and Snyder (2010) reported that 38 student, staff, and nonstudent school-associated violent deaths took place in 2009 and 24 were homicides. While this is startling, the rates of victimization at school and being threatened with a knife are declining (Robers et al., 2010). These activities have spurred a substantial amount of research in this area. The research and public outcry has led to some policy implications. One form of policy is school resource officers (SROs). SROs are police officers who are usually employed by a local law enforcement agency and assigned to work in a school or in multiple schools. These officers typically perform traditional law enforcement functions, which include patrolling school property, investigating criminal complaints and violations of laws, and maintaining order at after-school activities. Beyond these functions, SROs educate faculty, staff, and students and improve the school environment. Typically, SROs are uniformed, armed, and have received specialized training for law enforcement in schools. In the past, research has been published in separate venues. Thus, the literature on SROs is in its infancy and is small. Therefore, this special issue on the tactics of SROs has two main purposes. First, it is designed to enlighten the field about SROs by providing articles that empirically examine their characteristics, duties, tactics, and working conditions. Second, it provides","PeriodicalId":89175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of police crisis negotiations : an international journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"93 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332586.2011.581507","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of police crisis negotiations : an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332586.2011.581507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School violence is an important issue in contemporary society. School violence is a conglomeration of several different behaviors that include physical fighting, feeling unsafe, carrying a weapon, and being threatened or injured with a weapon on school property. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) reported that 11% of students were involved in physical fighting, 5% of students felt unsafe at school or on their way to school, 5.6% of students carried a weapon (i.e., knife, gun, or club), and 7.7% of students were threatened or injured with a weapon on school property in 2009 in Grades 9–12. Robers, Zhang, Truman, and Snyder (2010) reported that 38 student, staff, and nonstudent school-associated violent deaths took place in 2009 and 24 were homicides. While this is startling, the rates of victimization at school and being threatened with a knife are declining (Robers et al., 2010). These activities have spurred a substantial amount of research in this area. The research and public outcry has led to some policy implications. One form of policy is school resource officers (SROs). SROs are police officers who are usually employed by a local law enforcement agency and assigned to work in a school or in multiple schools. These officers typically perform traditional law enforcement functions, which include patrolling school property, investigating criminal complaints and violations of laws, and maintaining order at after-school activities. Beyond these functions, SROs educate faculty, staff, and students and improve the school environment. Typically, SROs are uniformed, armed, and have received specialized training for law enforcement in schools. In the past, research has been published in separate venues. Thus, the literature on SROs is in its infancy and is small. Therefore, this special issue on the tactics of SROs has two main purposes. First, it is designed to enlighten the field about SROs by providing articles that empirically examine their characteristics, duties, tactics, and working conditions. Second, it provides
特邀编辑简介
校园暴力是当代社会的一个重要问题。校园暴力是几种不同行为的集合体,包括身体打架、感觉不安全、携带武器、在校园里受到武器威胁或伤害。美国疾病控制与预防中心(2010年)报告称,2009年9-12年级的学生中,11%的学生参与过肢体冲突,5%的学生在学校或上学途中感到不安全,5.6%的学生携带武器(即刀、枪或棍棒),7.7%的学生在学校受到武器威胁或受伤。Robers、Zhang、Truman和Snyder(2010)报告说,2009年发生了38起与学生、教职员工和非学生有关的校园暴力死亡事件,其中24起是谋杀。虽然这令人吃惊,但在学校受害和被刀威胁的比率正在下降(罗伯斯等人,2010年)。这些活动促进了这一领域的大量研究。这项研究和公众的强烈抗议导致了一些政策上的影响。政策的一种形式是学校资源官员(sro)。sro通常是由当地执法机构雇用的警察,他们被分配到一所学校或多个学校工作。这些警察通常执行传统的执法职能,包括巡逻学校财产,调查刑事投诉和违法行为,以及在课后活动中维持秩序。除了这些功能之外,sro还教育教职员工和学生,并改善学校环境。通常情况下,sro穿着制服,携带武器,并在学校接受过执法方面的专门培训。过去,研究发表在不同的地方。因此,关于sro的文献还处于起步阶段,数量很少。因此,这篇关于sro策略的专题文章有两个主要目的。首先,它旨在通过提供实证研究sro的特征、职责、策略和工作条件的文章来启发该领域。其次,它提供了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信