Sperm donors as assisters of reproduction in single women

Q1 Arts and Humanities
E. Ignovska
{"title":"Sperm donors as assisters of reproduction in single women","authors":"E. Ignovska","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2014.957951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political as opposed to the natural constitution of ancient families for some authors is associated with the fiction of patriarchy (Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 19). This had meaning as a form of political power, which when introduced referred only to the sexual domination of the rule of husbands and fathers in the smallest unit of society. Only afterwards did the fiction of patriarchy take on the broader meaning of a dominating class, and thus a universal feature of human society. Accordingly, the representatives of this view consider the father's role in a family to be strictly conventional (i.e. imposed by force) and the family, therefore, is seen only as an artificial institution that negotiates the roles of its members, just as society does. Under these terms, the patriarchal family is not based on biological or natural ties, but on “legal fiction” (Pateman referred to the term “legal fiction” which was used by Sir Henry Maine in Maine, H. J. S. (1917). Ancient Law. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, p. 76. Available online as part of the Gutenberg Ebooks, Chapter II: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22910/22910-h/22910-h.htm). While the mother's biological participation has always been certain, since she is the one who physically gives birth to the child, paternity has had to be discovered or invented, becoming only a human creation. This fiction, however, served the political purpose of keeping the family together. Thus, the “fiction of adoption” and the “reality of kinship” were considered equal as long as the family's formation was maintained. By comparison, ancient families were not that different from contemporary families founded on adoptions or sperm donations. Again, the role of the father here is negotiated – the “legal fiction” of the husband/partner when sperm is donated to a couple and his absence when sperm is donated to single women. Regardless of genetics, the absence of a social and legal father in a child's life can also occur in single-mother families where the parents conceived via coitus. Nevertheless, lacking both a genetic and a social father can only be ascribed to single women – parents by choice. Is fatherhood that unimportant?","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"226 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/11287462.2014.957951","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2014.957951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The political as opposed to the natural constitution of ancient families for some authors is associated with the fiction of patriarchy (Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 19). This had meaning as a form of political power, which when introduced referred only to the sexual domination of the rule of husbands and fathers in the smallest unit of society. Only afterwards did the fiction of patriarchy take on the broader meaning of a dominating class, and thus a universal feature of human society. Accordingly, the representatives of this view consider the father's role in a family to be strictly conventional (i.e. imposed by force) and the family, therefore, is seen only as an artificial institution that negotiates the roles of its members, just as society does. Under these terms, the patriarchal family is not based on biological or natural ties, but on “legal fiction” (Pateman referred to the term “legal fiction” which was used by Sir Henry Maine in Maine, H. J. S. (1917). Ancient Law. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, p. 76. Available online as part of the Gutenberg Ebooks, Chapter II: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22910/22910-h/22910-h.htm). While the mother's biological participation has always been certain, since she is the one who physically gives birth to the child, paternity has had to be discovered or invented, becoming only a human creation. This fiction, however, served the political purpose of keeping the family together. Thus, the “fiction of adoption” and the “reality of kinship” were considered equal as long as the family's formation was maintained. By comparison, ancient families were not that different from contemporary families founded on adoptions or sperm donations. Again, the role of the father here is negotiated – the “legal fiction” of the husband/partner when sperm is donated to a couple and his absence when sperm is donated to single women. Regardless of genetics, the absence of a social and legal father in a child's life can also occur in single-mother families where the parents conceived via coitus. Nevertheless, lacking both a genetic and a social father can only be ascribed to single women – parents by choice. Is fatherhood that unimportant?
帮助单身女性生育的捐精者
对一些作家来说,古代家庭的政治构成与自然构成相反,这与父权制的虚构有关(Pateman, C.(1988))。性契约。剑桥:政治出版社,第19页)。作为一种政治权力形式,这是有意义的,当它被引入时,它只指在最小的社会单位中丈夫和父亲的性统治。直到后来,父权制的虚构才具有了统治阶级的更广泛含义,从而成为人类社会的普遍特征。因此,这种观点的代表认为父亲在家庭中的作用是严格传统的(即通过武力强加的),因此,家庭只是被视为一个人为的机构,就其成员的角色进行协商,就像社会一样。在这些术语下,父权制家庭不是建立在生物或自然关系的基础上,而是建立在“法律虚构”的基础上(帕特曼提到的“法律虚构”一词是亨利·缅因爵士在《缅因州》中使用的,h.j.s.(1917)。古老的法律。伦敦:邓特父子出版社,第76页。可在线作为古腾堡电子书的一部分,第二章:http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22910/22910-h/22910-h.htm)。虽然母亲的生物学参与一直是确定的,因为她是生理上生下孩子的人,但父权必须被发现或发明,成为仅仅是人类的创造。然而,这个虚构的故事服务于让这个家庭团结在一起的政治目的。因此,只要维持家庭的构成,“虚构的收养”和“现实的亲属关系”就被认为是平等的。相比之下,古代家庭与建立在收养或精子捐赠基础上的现代家庭并没有太大区别。再一次,父亲的角色在这里是协商好的——当精子捐赠给一对夫妇时,丈夫/伴侣的“法律虚构”,当精子捐赠给单身女性时,他的缺席。不考虑遗传因素,在父母通过性交受孕的单亲母亲家庭中,孩子生活中缺少社会和法律上的父亲也可能发生。然而,缺乏基因和社会上的父亲只能归咎于单身女性——父母的选择。做父亲就那么不重要吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信