The Regional Factor in Contemporary Ukrainian Politics: Scale, Place, Space, or Bogus Effect?

J. O’Loughlin
{"title":"The Regional Factor in Contemporary Ukrainian Politics: Scale, Place, Space, or Bogus Effect?","authors":"J. O’Loughlin","doi":"10.1080/10889388.2001.10641161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A U.S. political geographer, examining regional political divisions in post-independence Ukraine, argues that the debate between the school positing that regional cleavages are ebbing and that which holds that Ukraine has not yet become a political community is also fundamentally a geographic question regarding scale and place. Using two measures of political preferences, votes in the 1999 presidential runoff election and the political attitudes expressed in 1992 and 1996 Eurobarometer surveys, the regional effect in Ukraine is shown to be complicated by the nature of the political question and by local disparities from regional trends. New methods of analysis clarify these complications and challenge both schools of researchers to heed issues of measurement, technique, and geographic issues of scale. 11 figures, 4 tables, 61 references.","PeriodicalId":85332,"journal":{"name":"Post-Soviet geography and economics","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10889388.2001.10641161","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Soviet geography and economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10889388.2001.10641161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

A U.S. political geographer, examining regional political divisions in post-independence Ukraine, argues that the debate between the school positing that regional cleavages are ebbing and that which holds that Ukraine has not yet become a political community is also fundamentally a geographic question regarding scale and place. Using two measures of political preferences, votes in the 1999 presidential runoff election and the political attitudes expressed in 1992 and 1996 Eurobarometer surveys, the regional effect in Ukraine is shown to be complicated by the nature of the political question and by local disparities from regional trends. New methods of analysis clarify these complications and challenge both schools of researchers to heed issues of measurement, technique, and geographic issues of scale. 11 figures, 4 tables, 61 references.
当代乌克兰政治中的地区因素:规模、地点、空间,还是虚假效应?
一位美国政治地理学家研究了乌克兰独立后的地区政治分歧,认为认为地区分裂正在消退的学派和认为乌克兰尚未成为一个政治共同体的学派之间的争论,从根本上讲也是一个关于规模和地点的地理问题。使用政治偏好的两种衡量标准,即1999年总统决选中的投票和1992年和1996年欧洲晴雨表调查中所表达的政治态度,乌克兰的区域效应因政治问题的性质和地区趋势的地方差异而变得复杂。新的分析方法澄清了这些复杂性,并挑战两个学派的研究人员注意尺度的测量、技术和地理问题。11张图,4张表,61篇参考文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信