The Urban-Rural Divide in the Russian Electorate and the Effect of Distance from Urban Centers

A. V. Berezkin, M. Myagkov, P. Ordeshook
{"title":"The Urban-Rural Divide in the Russian Electorate and the Effect of Distance from Urban Centers","authors":"A. V. Berezkin, M. Myagkov, P. Ordeshook","doi":"10.1080/10889388.1999.10641122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A team of Russian and American geographers and political scientists examines what is perhaps the most evident correlate of aggregate voting patterns in Russia from 1991 to 1996—the urban-rural divide within the electorate, with urban areas consistently exhibiting greater support than their rural counterparts for candidates and parties that can be labeled pro-Reform or pro-Yel'tsin. The usual explanations for this pattern concern the greater proportion of young and educated voters in urban areas and the proximity of voters there to the ostensible benefits, promised or real, of reform. This essay, however, argues on the basis of a reassessment of the 1996 Presidential election second-round returns that a share of this correlation can be explained not by mere proximity to urban areas or the urban-rural characteristics of a rayon, but also by a rayon's proximity to regional and local political bosses—those political figures most likely to use their influence to gather votes for Yel'tsin's reelection. Journal ...","PeriodicalId":85332,"journal":{"name":"Post-Soviet geography and economics","volume":"22 1","pages":"395-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10889388.1999.10641122","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Soviet geography and economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10889388.1999.10641122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

A team of Russian and American geographers and political scientists examines what is perhaps the most evident correlate of aggregate voting patterns in Russia from 1991 to 1996—the urban-rural divide within the electorate, with urban areas consistently exhibiting greater support than their rural counterparts for candidates and parties that can be labeled pro-Reform or pro-Yel'tsin. The usual explanations for this pattern concern the greater proportion of young and educated voters in urban areas and the proximity of voters there to the ostensible benefits, promised or real, of reform. This essay, however, argues on the basis of a reassessment of the 1996 Presidential election second-round returns that a share of this correlation can be explained not by mere proximity to urban areas or the urban-rural characteristics of a rayon, but also by a rayon's proximity to regional and local political bosses—those political figures most likely to use their influence to gather votes for Yel'tsin's reelection. Journal ...
俄罗斯选民的城乡分化与城市中心距离的影响
一个由俄罗斯和美国地理学家和政治学家组成的团队研究了俄罗斯从1991年到1996年的总体投票模式中可能最明显的相关性——选民中的城乡差距,城市地区始终比农村地区更支持那些可以被标记为支持改革或支持叶利钦的候选人和政党。对这种模式的通常解释是,城市地区年轻和受过教育的选民比例更大,而且那里的选民更接近改革所承诺或实际的表面利益。然而,本文在对1996年总统选举第二轮选举结果重新评估的基础上提出,这种相关性的一部分不仅可以用靠近城市地区或人造丝的城乡特征来解释,还可以用人造丝与地区和地方政治领导人的接近来解释——这些政治人物最有可能利用他们的影响力为叶利钦的连任收集选票。杂志……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信