The 7C Approach to Conceptualizing Administration: Executive Leadership in the 21st Century

J. Tropman, L. Wooten
{"title":"The 7C Approach to Conceptualizing Administration: Executive Leadership in the 21st Century","authors":"J. Tropman, L. Wooten","doi":"10.1080/03643107.2013.831714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of administration of organizations is huge. There are about 1.1 million 501©3 organizations in 2011 (Independent Sector). Each has a CEO, and other top administrators. Let’s assume an average of 4—which would generate 5.5 million Executive Leaders. On the operation level there are huge questions about how these individuals are recruited, trained and educated, paid, replaced and so on. Then there are questions about what, actually, should they DO? And on the conceptual level, there are questions about how we understand the thousands of pieces of writing—both popular and scholarly—about Administration and Executive Leadership. This editorial makes two overall points. One is that the taxonomic device discussed here— the 7Cs—is a good way to think about Executive Leadership and that vast literature. Second the word “Administration” is made up of two parts—Executiveship—the tactical/management part, and Leadership—the strategic/visioning and strategic. Further, as is perhaps evident from the previous definition—Executiveship and Leadership conflict with each other. Many of us are oriented more one way or the other and a few are nimble enough to do both, each when necessary. Let’s discuss each in turn.","PeriodicalId":79549,"journal":{"name":"Administration in social work","volume":"37 1","pages":"325 - 328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03643107.2013.831714","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration in social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107.2013.831714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The field of administration of organizations is huge. There are about 1.1 million 501©3 organizations in 2011 (Independent Sector). Each has a CEO, and other top administrators. Let’s assume an average of 4—which would generate 5.5 million Executive Leaders. On the operation level there are huge questions about how these individuals are recruited, trained and educated, paid, replaced and so on. Then there are questions about what, actually, should they DO? And on the conceptual level, there are questions about how we understand the thousands of pieces of writing—both popular and scholarly—about Administration and Executive Leadership. This editorial makes two overall points. One is that the taxonomic device discussed here— the 7Cs—is a good way to think about Executive Leadership and that vast literature. Second the word “Administration” is made up of two parts—Executiveship—the tactical/management part, and Leadership—the strategic/visioning and strategic. Further, as is perhaps evident from the previous definition—Executiveship and Leadership conflict with each other. Many of us are oriented more one way or the other and a few are nimble enough to do both, each when necessary. Let’s discuss each in turn.
管理概念的7C方法:21世纪的行政领导
组织管理的领域是巨大的。2011年大约有110万个501©3组织(独立部门)。每家公司都有首席执行官和其他高层管理人员。让我们假设平均为4——这将产生550万行政领导人。在运营层面上,如何招募、培训和教育这些人、支付薪酬、替换等等都存在着巨大的问题。接下来的问题是,他们到底应该做什么?在概念层面上,关于我们如何理解成千上万篇关于行政管理和行政领导的著作——无论是通俗的还是学术的——存在一些问题。这篇社论概括了两点。一是这里讨论的分类学方法——7c——是思考行政领导和大量文献的好方法。其次,“行政管理”一词由两部分组成:行政管理-战术/管理部分,领导-战略/愿景和战略。此外,从前面的定义中可以明显看出,执行力和领导力是相互冲突的。我们中的许多人更倾向于一种或另一种方式,而少数人则足够灵活,可以在必要时两者兼而有之。让我们依次讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信