Regional and seasonal patterns of nutritional condition and reproduction in elk Patrones regionales y estacionales en el estado nutricional y la reproducción del alce Tendances régionales et saisonnières observées sur l'état nutritionnel et la reproduction du wapiti

IF 4.3 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Rachel C. Cook, John G. Cook, David J. Vales, Bruce K. Johnson, Scott M. Mccorquodale, Lisa A. Shipley, Robert A. Riggs, Larry L. Irwin, Shannon L. Murphie, Bryan L. Murphie, Kathryn A. Schoenecker, Frank Geyer, P. Briggs Hall, Rocky D. Spencer, Dave A. Immell, Dewaine H. Jackson, Brett L. Tiller, Patrick J. Miller, Lowell Schmitz
{"title":"Regional and seasonal patterns of nutritional condition and reproduction in elk\n Patrones regionales y estacionales en el estado nutricional y la reproducción del alce\n Tendances régionales et saisonnières observées sur l'état nutritionnel et la reproduction du wapiti","authors":"Rachel C. Cook,&nbsp;John G. Cook,&nbsp;David J. Vales,&nbsp;Bruce K. Johnson,&nbsp;Scott M. Mccorquodale,&nbsp;Lisa A. Shipley,&nbsp;Robert A. Riggs,&nbsp;Larry L. Irwin,&nbsp;Shannon L. Murphie,&nbsp;Bryan L. Murphie,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Schoenecker,&nbsp;Frank Geyer,&nbsp;P. Briggs Hall,&nbsp;Rocky D. Spencer,&nbsp;Dave A. Immell,&nbsp;Dewaine H. Jackson,&nbsp;Brett L. Tiller,&nbsp;Patrick J. Miller,&nbsp;Lowell Schmitz","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Demographic data show many populations of Rocky Mountain (<i>Cervus elaphus nelsoni</i>) and Roosevelt (<i>Cervus elaphus roosevelti</i>) elk have been declining over the last few decades. Recent work suggests that forage quality and associated animal nutritional condition, particularly in late summer and early autumn, influence reproduction and survival in elk. Therefore, we estimated seasonal nutritional condition of 861 female elk in 2,114 capture events from 21 herds in Washington, Oregon, Wyoming, Colorado, and South Dakota from 1998 to 2007. We estimated ingesta-free body fat and body mass, and determined age, pregnancy status, and lactation status. We obtained estimates for most herds in both late winter–early spring (late Feb–early Apr) and in autumn (Nov–early Dec) to identify changes in nutritional condition of individuals across seasons.</p>\n \n <p>Body fat levels of lactating females in autumn were consistently lower than their non-lactating counterparts, and herd averages of lactating elk ranged from 5.5% to 12.4%. These levels were 30–75% of those documented for captive lactating elk fed high-quality diets during summer and autumn. Body fat levels were generally lowest in the coastal and inland northwest regions and highest along the west-slope of the northern Cascades. Adult females in most herds lost an average of 30.7 kg (range: 5–62 kg), or about 13% (range: 2.6–25%) of their autumn mass during winter, indicating nutritional deficiencies. However, we found no significant relationships between spring body fat or change in body fat over winter with winter weather, region, or herd, despite markedly different winter weather among herds and regions. Instead, body fat levels in spring were primarily a function of fat levels the previous autumn. Thinner females in autumn lost less body fat and body mass over winter than did fatter females, a compensatory response, but still ended the season with less body fat than the fatter elk.</p>\n \n <p>Body fat levels of lactating females in autumn varied among herds but were unrelated to their body fat levels the previous spring. Within herds, thinner females exhibited a compensatory response during summer and accrued more fat than their fatter counterparts over summer, resulting in similar body fat levels among lactating elk in autumn despite considerable differences in their fat levels the previous spring. Level of body fat achieved by lactating females in autumn varied 2-fold among herds, undoubtedly because of differences in summer nutrition. Thus, summer nutrition set limits to rates of body fat accrual of lactating females that in turn limited body condition across the annual cycle.</p>\n \n <p>Pregnancy rates of 2- to 14-year-old females ranged from 68% to 100% in coastal populations of Washington, 69% to 98% in Cascade populations of Washington and Oregon, 84% to 94% in inland northwestern populations of Washington and Oregon, and 78% to 93% in Rocky Mountain populations. We found evidence of late breeding, even in herds with comparatively high pregnancy rates. Mean body mass of calves (<i>n</i> = 242) in 3 populations was 75 kg, 81 kg, and 97 kg, representing 55–70% of potential mass for 6- to 8-month-old calves on high-quality diets. Mean mass of 11 yearling females caught in autumn was 162 kg, approximately 70% of potential for autumn, and pregnancy rate was 27%. Mean mass of 28 yearlings caught in spring was 163 kg and pregnancy rate was 34%.</p>\n \n <p>Our data suggest widespread occurrence of inadequate summer nutrition. Summer ranges of just 3 herds supported relatively high levels of autumn body fat (11–13% body fat) and pregnancy rates (&gt;90%) even among females that successfully raised a calf year after year. Most other summer ranges supported relatively low autumn levels of body fat (5–9% body fat), and reproductive pauses were common (&lt;80% pregnancy rates). Overall, our data failed to support 2 common assumptions: 1) summer and early autumn foraging conditions are typically satisfactory to prevent nutritional limitations to adult fat accretion, pregnancy rates, and calf and yearling growth; and 2) winter nutrition and winter weather are the principal limiting effects on elk productivity. Instead, a strong interaction existed among level of summer nutrition, lactation status, and probability of breeding that was little affected by winter conditions—adequacy of summer nutrition dictated reproductive performance of female elk and growth as well as growth and development of their offspring in the Northwest and Rocky Mountains. Our work signals the need for greater emphasis on summer habitats in land management planning on behalf of elk. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":"184 1","pages":"1-45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1008","citationCount":"108","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.1008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

Abstract

Demographic data show many populations of Rocky Mountain (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) and Roosevelt (Cervus elaphus roosevelti) elk have been declining over the last few decades. Recent work suggests that forage quality and associated animal nutritional condition, particularly in late summer and early autumn, influence reproduction and survival in elk. Therefore, we estimated seasonal nutritional condition of 861 female elk in 2,114 capture events from 21 herds in Washington, Oregon, Wyoming, Colorado, and South Dakota from 1998 to 2007. We estimated ingesta-free body fat and body mass, and determined age, pregnancy status, and lactation status. We obtained estimates for most herds in both late winter–early spring (late Feb–early Apr) and in autumn (Nov–early Dec) to identify changes in nutritional condition of individuals across seasons.

Body fat levels of lactating females in autumn were consistently lower than their non-lactating counterparts, and herd averages of lactating elk ranged from 5.5% to 12.4%. These levels were 30–75% of those documented for captive lactating elk fed high-quality diets during summer and autumn. Body fat levels were generally lowest in the coastal and inland northwest regions and highest along the west-slope of the northern Cascades. Adult females in most herds lost an average of 30.7 kg (range: 5–62 kg), or about 13% (range: 2.6–25%) of their autumn mass during winter, indicating nutritional deficiencies. However, we found no significant relationships between spring body fat or change in body fat over winter with winter weather, region, or herd, despite markedly different winter weather among herds and regions. Instead, body fat levels in spring were primarily a function of fat levels the previous autumn. Thinner females in autumn lost less body fat and body mass over winter than did fatter females, a compensatory response, but still ended the season with less body fat than the fatter elk.

Body fat levels of lactating females in autumn varied among herds but were unrelated to their body fat levels the previous spring. Within herds, thinner females exhibited a compensatory response during summer and accrued more fat than their fatter counterparts over summer, resulting in similar body fat levels among lactating elk in autumn despite considerable differences in their fat levels the previous spring. Level of body fat achieved by lactating females in autumn varied 2-fold among herds, undoubtedly because of differences in summer nutrition. Thus, summer nutrition set limits to rates of body fat accrual of lactating females that in turn limited body condition across the annual cycle.

Pregnancy rates of 2- to 14-year-old females ranged from 68% to 100% in coastal populations of Washington, 69% to 98% in Cascade populations of Washington and Oregon, 84% to 94% in inland northwestern populations of Washington and Oregon, and 78% to 93% in Rocky Mountain populations. We found evidence of late breeding, even in herds with comparatively high pregnancy rates. Mean body mass of calves (n = 242) in 3 populations was 75 kg, 81 kg, and 97 kg, representing 55–70% of potential mass for 6- to 8-month-old calves on high-quality diets. Mean mass of 11 yearling females caught in autumn was 162 kg, approximately 70% of potential for autumn, and pregnancy rate was 27%. Mean mass of 28 yearlings caught in spring was 163 kg and pregnancy rate was 34%.

Our data suggest widespread occurrence of inadequate summer nutrition. Summer ranges of just 3 herds supported relatively high levels of autumn body fat (11–13% body fat) and pregnancy rates (>90%) even among females that successfully raised a calf year after year. Most other summer ranges supported relatively low autumn levels of body fat (5–9% body fat), and reproductive pauses were common (<80% pregnancy rates). Overall, our data failed to support 2 common assumptions: 1) summer and early autumn foraging conditions are typically satisfactory to prevent nutritional limitations to adult fat accretion, pregnancy rates, and calf and yearling growth; and 2) winter nutrition and winter weather are the principal limiting effects on elk productivity. Instead, a strong interaction existed among level of summer nutrition, lactation status, and probability of breeding that was little affected by winter conditions—adequacy of summer nutrition dictated reproductive performance of female elk and growth as well as growth and development of their offspring in the Northwest and Rocky Mountains. Our work signals the need for greater emphasis on summer habitats in land management planning on behalf of elk. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.

麋鹿营养状况和繁殖的区域和季节模式麋鹿营养状况和繁殖的区域和季节模式麋鹿营养状况和繁殖的区域和季节趋势
人口统计数据显示,在过去的几十年里,落基山麋鹿(Cervus elaphus nelsoni)和罗斯福麋鹿(Cervus elaphus Roosevelt)的数量一直在下降。最近的研究表明,饲料质量和相关的动物营养状况,特别是在夏末和初秋,影响麋鹿的繁殖和生存。因此,我们估计了1998年至2007年在华盛顿州、俄勒冈州、怀俄明州、科罗拉多州和南达科他州的21个鹿群中捕获的2114个事件中的861只雌性麋鹿的季节性营养状况。我们估计了无摄入体脂肪和体重,并确定了年龄、妊娠状态和哺乳状态。我们在冬末-早春(2月下旬- 4月初)和秋季(11月- 12月初)对大多数畜群进行了估算,以确定个体营养状况在不同季节的变化。秋季哺乳期雌鹿体脂水平始终低于非哺乳期雌鹿,哺乳期雌鹿群平均体脂水平为5.5% ~ 12.4%。这些水平是记录在案的夏季和秋季饲喂高质量饲料的圈养哺乳麋鹿的30-75%。体脂水平一般在西北沿海和内陆地区最低,在北喀斯喀特山脉西坡地区最高。大多数畜群的成年母象在冬季平均损失30.7公斤(范围:5-62公斤),或秋季体重的13%(范围:2.6-25%),表明营养缺乏。然而,我们发现春季体脂或冬季体脂变化与冬季天气、地区或畜群之间没有显著关系,尽管畜群和地区之间的冬季天气明显不同。相反,春季的身体脂肪水平主要是前一个秋季脂肪水平的函数。在秋季,较瘦的雌鹿比较胖的雌鹿在冬季减掉的体脂和体重更少,这是一种补偿性反应,但在秋季结束时,它们的体脂仍比较胖的雌鹿少。不同畜群的秋季哺乳期雌性体脂水平各不相同,但与前一个春季的体脂水平无关。在鹿群中,较瘦的母鹿在夏季表现出补偿反应,在夏季比较胖的母鹿积累了更多的脂肪,导致秋季哺乳麋鹿的体脂水平相似,尽管它们的脂肪水平在前一个春天有相当大的差异。秋季哺乳期母牛的体脂水平在不同畜群之间相差2倍,这无疑是由于夏季营养的差异。因此,夏季营养限制了哺乳期雌性的体脂积累率,从而限制了全年周期内的身体状况。华盛顿州沿海地区2- 14岁女性的怀孕率为68% - 100%,华盛顿州和俄勒冈州喀斯喀特地区的怀孕率为69% - 98%,华盛顿州和俄勒冈州西北内陆地区的怀孕率为84% - 94%,落基山脉地区的怀孕率为78% - 93%。我们发现了晚育的证据,即使在怀孕率相对较高的畜群中也是如此。3个种群中242头犊牛的平均体重分别为75 kg、81 kg和97 kg,占6- 8月龄高质量犊牛潜在体重的55-70%。秋季捕获的11只1岁雌鱼平均体重为162公斤,约为秋季潜势的70%,怀孕率为27%。春季捕获28只幼鱼,平均体重163公斤,受孕率34%。我们的数据表明,夏季营养不足的现象普遍存在。夏季只有3个象群,即使是那些年复一年成功地养大了一头小牛的母象,其秋季体脂水平(11-13%)和怀孕率(90%)也相对较高。大多数其他夏季系列支持相对较低的秋季体脂水平(5-9%体脂),生殖暂停很常见(<80%的怀孕率)。总的来说,我们的数据不支持两个常见的假设:1)夏季和初秋的觅食条件通常令人满意,可以防止营养限制对成年脂肪的增加,怀孕率,小牛和一岁的生长;冬季营养和冬季气候是影响麋鹿生产力的主要限制因素。相反,夏季营养水平、哺乳状态和繁殖概率之间存在着强烈的相互作用,而冬季条件对夏季营养的充足性决定了西北和落基山脉雌性麋鹿的繁殖性能和生长发育,以及它们后代的生长发育。我们的工作表明,为了麋鹿的利益,需要在土地管理规划中更加重视夏季栖息地。©2013野生动物协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Monographs
Wildlife Monographs 生物-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wildlife Monographs supplements The Journal of Wildlife Management with focused investigations in the area of the management and conservation of wildlife. Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) CAB Abstracts® (CABI) Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database (ProQuest) Global Health (CABI) Grasslands & Forage Abstracts (CABI) Helminthological Abstracts (CABI) Natural Science Collection (ProQuest) Poultry Abstracts (CABI) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-543 Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts (CABI) Veterinary Bulletin (CABI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信