Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise: Split-Attention and Redundancy Effects in Reading Comprehension Tasks With Vocabulary Definitions

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
A. Yeung
{"title":"Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise: Split-Attention and Redundancy Effects in Reading Comprehension Tasks With Vocabulary Definitions","authors":"A. Yeung","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 3 experiments, the author examined the effects of cognitive load management by inserting vocabulary definitions into reading passages. In Experiment 1, for 5th-grade readers of English as a 2nd language (ESL), vocabulary definitions integrated within a passage (integrated format) improved comprehension (high-level processing), whereas a separate vocabulary list (separated format) improved vocabulary learning (low-level processing). In Experiment 2, for 8th-grade ESL learners, the separated format improved comprehension, whereas the integrated format improved vocabulary learning. In Experiment 3, with university students, there was a Format × Level interaction effect similar to that in Experiment 2. Efficiency of instruction depends partly on its ability to manage cognitive load. An identical presentation format may facilitate learning by reducing cognitive load but may interfere with learning through either split-attention or redundancy effects, depending on learner expertise. For less experie...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"2673 1","pages":"197-217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598353","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Abstract In 3 experiments, the author examined the effects of cognitive load management by inserting vocabulary definitions into reading passages. In Experiment 1, for 5th-grade readers of English as a 2nd language (ESL), vocabulary definitions integrated within a passage (integrated format) improved comprehension (high-level processing), whereas a separate vocabulary list (separated format) improved vocabulary learning (low-level processing). In Experiment 2, for 8th-grade ESL learners, the separated format improved comprehension, whereas the integrated format improved vocabulary learning. In Experiment 3, with university students, there was a Format × Level interaction effect similar to that in Experiment 2. Efficiency of instruction depends partly on its ability to manage cognitive load. An identical presentation format may facilitate learning by reducing cognitive load but may interfere with learning through either split-attention or redundancy effects, depending on learner expertise. For less experie...
认知负荷与学习者专长:词汇定义阅读理解任务中的注意力分散和冗余效应
摘要通过三个实验,作者考察了在阅读段落中插入词汇定义对认知负荷管理的影响。在实验1中,对于五年级英语作为第二语言(ESL)的读者来说,整合在一篇文章中的词汇定义(整合格式)促进了理解(高水平加工),而单独的词汇表(分离格式)促进了词汇学习(低水平加工)。在实验2中,对于八年级的ESL学习者来说,分离格式提高了理解能力,而整合格式提高了词汇学习能力。在以大学生为对象的实验3中,存在与实验2相似的Format × Level交互效应。教学的效率部分取决于其管理认知负荷的能力。相同的演示格式可以通过减少认知负荷来促进学习,但可能会通过注意力分散或冗余效应干扰学习,这取决于学习者的专业知识。对于经验较少的人来说……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信