Kerlinger's Research Myths: An Overview With Implications for Educational Researchers

IF 2.2 4区教育学 Q1 Social Sciences

Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1996-10-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785

L. Daniel

引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract A generation ago, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that there were a number of myths that pervaded educational research. An overview of 3 specific myths—the methods, practicality, and statistics myths—is provided, followed by a discussion about the degree to which these myths have been overcome or still exist in educational research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Kerlinger的研究神话:对教育研究者的启示概述

一代人以前，Fred N. Kerlinger提出，在教育研究中存在许多神话。本文概述了三种具体的迷思——方法迷思、实用性迷思和统计迷思，然后讨论了这些迷思在教育研究中被克服或仍然存在的程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Education Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.