Effects of Advance Organizers and Repeated Presentations on Students' Learning

IF 2.2 4区教育学 Q1 Social Sciences

Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1996-10-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943789

Kenneth A. Kiewra, R. Mayer, Nelson F. Dubois, Maribeth Christensen, Sung-il Kim, N. Risch

{"title":"Effects of Advance Organizers and Repeated Presentations on Students' Learning","authors":"Kenneth A. Kiewra, R. Mayer, Nelson F. Dubois, Maribeth Christensen, Sung-il Kim, N. Risch","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of advance organizers and repeating a lecture on test performance. Participants viewed a videotaped lecture about the process of radar once, twice, or three times. Before each viewing, they studied one of three different advance organizers—a conventional organizer that summarized the main steps of the radar process as a list, a linear organizer that summarized the steps and subordinate information in outline form, and a matrix organizer that summarized the steps and subordinate information in matrix form. Repeated presentations of the lecture increased note taking, recognition of isolated facts, and overall recall to some degree. Advance organizers had a test-appropriate effect The advance organizers that integrated subtopic information (linear and matrix) increased recall of subtopic information, whereas the more general organizer (conventional) aided overall recall, especially general topic information. No performance differences were observed ...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"147-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943789","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 30

Abstract

Abstract An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of advance organizers and repeating a lecture on test performance. Participants viewed a videotaped lecture about the process of radar once, twice, or three times. Before each viewing, they studied one of three different advance organizers—a conventional organizer that summarized the main steps of the radar process as a list, a linear organizer that summarized the steps and subordinate information in outline form, and a matrix organizer that summarized the steps and subordinate information in matrix form. Repeated presentations of the lecture increased note taking, recognition of isolated facts, and overall recall to some degree. Advance organizers had a test-appropriate effect The advance organizers that integrated subtopic information (linear and matrix) increased recall of subtopic information, whereas the more general organizer (conventional) aided overall recall, especially general topic information. No performance differences were observed ...

查看原文本刊更多论文

提前组织者和重复演讲对学生学习的影响

摘要:本实验旨在考察提前组织者和重复讲座对考试成绩的影响。参与者观看了一次、两次或三次有关雷达过程的录像讲座。在每次观看之前，他们研究了三种不同的预先组织者中的一种——一种是传统的组织者，它将雷达过程的主要步骤总结为列表，一种是线性组织者，它以大纲形式总结步骤和从属信息，还有一种是矩阵组织者，它以矩阵形式总结步骤和从属信息。重复的演讲在一定程度上增加了记笔记、对孤立事实的识别和整体记忆。整合子主题信息(线性和矩阵)的提前组织者提高了子主题信息的回忆，而更一般的组织者(传统)有助于整体回忆，特别是一般主题信息。没有观察到性能差异……

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Education Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.