Dissertation Quality and Kerlinger's Methods Myth

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Judith A. Ponticell, A. Olivárez
{"title":"Dissertation Quality and Kerlinger's Methods Myth","authors":"Judith A. Ponticell, A. Olivárez","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1960, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that educational research embrace a methods myth regarding the rationale, purpose, and methods of educational research. In this article, the context in which Kerlinger developed his perspectives on educational research, his perceptions of mythology in educational research, and the importance of the methods myth for education dissertations are explored. The authors also posit that underlying Kerlinger's methods myth are two other myths associated with the dissertation: scholarship and quality. Following the discussion of these myths are cautious recommendations for the dissertation research preparation of graduate students in education.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract In 1960, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that educational research embrace a methods myth regarding the rationale, purpose, and methods of educational research. In this article, the context in which Kerlinger developed his perspectives on educational research, his perceptions of mythology in educational research, and the importance of the methods myth for education dissertations are explored. The authors also posit that underlying Kerlinger's methods myth are two other myths associated with the dissertation: scholarship and quality. Following the discussion of these myths are cautious recommendations for the dissertation research preparation of graduate students in education.
论文质量与克林格方法神话
1960年,Fred N. Kerlinger提出,教育研究包含了一个关于教育研究的基本原理、目的和方法的方法神话。本文探讨了克林格的教育研究观点的形成背景、他对神话在教育研究中的看法以及神话方法对教育论文的重要性。作者还假设,在Kerlinger的方法神话背后,还有另外两个与论文相关的神话:学术和质量。以下讨论这些神话是谨慎的建议,为研究生的论文研究准备教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信