The Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Graduate Students' Achievement, Test Anxiety, and Academic Self-Efficacy.

IF 2.2 4区教育学 Q1 Social Sciences

Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454

B. W. Griffin, M. Griffin

{"title":"The Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Graduate Students' Achievement, Test Anxiety, and Academic Self-Efficacy.","authors":"B. W. Griffin, M. Griffin","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) on graduate students' academic achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. In Experiment 1, students were assigned to one of two conditions—RPT or non-RPT. RPT students developed questions on specific course topics; they then used these questions to quiz other students before taking midterm and final course examinations. Contrary to previous research findings, the RPT and control groups did not differ significantly on lower cognitive or higher cognitive achievement measures. Students who used RPT generally reported that RPT improved their understanding of course content In Experiment 2, the RPT procedures were modifled to better match the procedures used in earlier studies whose authors had found RPT to be superior to non-RPT conditions. Also, the instruments were expanded to include course-relevant outcome measures of student academic self-efficacy and test anxiety. As in Experiment 1, the RPT an...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"197-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 65

Abstract

Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) on graduate students' academic achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. In Experiment 1, students were assigned to one of two conditions—RPT or non-RPT. RPT students developed questions on specific course topics; they then used these questions to quiz other students before taking midterm and final course examinations. Contrary to previous research findings, the RPT and control groups did not differ significantly on lower cognitive or higher cognitive achievement measures. Students who used RPT generally reported that RPT improved their understanding of course content In Experiment 2, the RPT procedures were modifled to better match the procedures used in earlier studies whose authors had found RPT to be superior to non-RPT conditions. Also, the instruments were expanded to include course-relevant outcome measures of student academic self-efficacy and test anxiety. As in Experiment 1, the RPT an...

查看原文本刊更多论文

互惠同伴辅导对研究生成绩、考试焦虑和学业自我效能的影响。

摘要本研究旨在探讨对等同伴辅导(RPT)对研究生学业成绩、考试焦虑和学业自我效能的影响。在实验1中，学生被分配到两个条件中的一个——rpt或非rpt。RPT学生针对特定的课程主题提出问题;然后，在参加期中和期末考试之前，他们用这些问题来测试其他学生。与之前的研究结果相反，RPT组和对照组在低认知成就和高认知成就方面没有显著差异。使用RPT的学生普遍报告说，RPT提高了他们对课程内容的理解。在实验2中，RPT程序被修改，以更好地匹配早期研究中使用的程序，这些研究的作者发现RPT优于非RPT条件。此外，这些工具被扩展到包括与课程相关的学生学业自我效能和考试焦虑的结果测量。在实验1中，RPT和…

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Education Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.