How Expectation of Questioning Method Affects Undergraduates' Preparation for Class

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
D. McDougall, Cheryl D. Granby
{"title":"How Expectation of Questioning Method Affects Undergraduates' Preparation for Class","authors":"D. McDougall, Cheryl D. Granby","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1996.9943462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Results of this experimental study indicated that undergraduates who expected their instructor to call on them, at random, to answer questions during class (a) completed more assigned readings before class, (b) recalled more information from these readings, and (c) demonstrated greater confidence in their reading recall than did classmates who expected their instructor to use voluntary oral questioning. These results suggest that college instructors who wish to increase undergraduates' preparation for class should carefully assess and select in-class questioning methods to ensure student accountability. Instructors of research methods or statistics can use this experiment as a simulation when teaching students about basic research designs, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"43-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943462","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Abstract Results of this experimental study indicated that undergraduates who expected their instructor to call on them, at random, to answer questions during class (a) completed more assigned readings before class, (b) recalled more information from these readings, and (c) demonstrated greater confidence in their reading recall than did classmates who expected their instructor to use voluntary oral questioning. These results suggest that college instructors who wish to increase undergraduates' preparation for class should carefully assess and select in-class questioning methods to ensure student accountability. Instructors of research methods or statistics can use this experiment as a simulation when teaching students about basic research designs, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics.
问法预期如何影响大学生备课
本实验研究的结果表明,期望老师在课堂上随机叫他们回答问题的本科生(a)在课前完成了更多的指定阅读材料,(b)从这些阅读材料中回忆了更多的信息,(c)比期望老师使用自愿口头提问的同学对自己的阅读回忆表现出更大的信心。这些结果表明,希望增加大学生课堂准备的大学教师应该仔细评估和选择课堂提问方法,以确保学生问责。研究方法或统计学的讲师在教授学生基本研究设计、描述性统计和推理统计时,可以使用这个实验作为模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信