Quantification of Physical and Numerical Mixing in a Coastal Ocean Model Using Salinity Variance Budgets

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Dylan Schlichting, Lixin Qu, Daijiro Kobashi, Robert Hetland
{"title":"Quantification of Physical and Numerical Mixing in a Coastal Ocean Model Using Salinity Variance Budgets","authors":"Dylan Schlichting,&nbsp;Lixin Qu,&nbsp;Daijiro Kobashi,&nbsp;Robert Hetland","doi":"10.1029/2022MS003380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numerical mixing, the spurious mixing primarily generated by the discretization of advection, is often significant in estuarine and coastal models due to sharp, energetic fronts. We compare on- and offline estimates of numerical mixing in a submesoscale-resolving realistic simulation of the ocean state over the Texas-Louisiana continental shelf. While offline estimates of numerical mixing differ from online estimates, offline methods may be the only analysis available. We use two methods to estimate numerical mixing offline based on the residuals of the salinity squared <i>s</i><sup>2</sup> and volume-mean salinity variance budgets. The budget overestimates the time-averaged online numerical mixing by 60% at hourly output. The <i>s</i><sup>2</sup> budget compares poorly due to large truncation errors associated with the tendency and advection terms. The residual of the <i>s</i><sup>2</sup> budget starts to converge to the budget as output frequency increases to 10 min—an unrealistic frequency for long-term coastal ocean simulations—but neither method unconditionally converges to the online method and therefore cannot be recommended for generic analysis of numerical mixing. We also investigate the effects of horizontal resolution on numerical mixing using a two-way nested grid with the online method. The volume-integrated numerical mixing constitutes 57% of the bulk physical mixing—the mixing prescribed by the turbulence closure scheme—in the coarse model and may exceed the physical mixing by half an order of magnitude. We find numerical mixing is reduced by 35% on average in the nested model, likely due to new dynamical processes that emerge in the nested simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2022MS003380","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022MS003380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Numerical mixing, the spurious mixing primarily generated by the discretization of advection, is often significant in estuarine and coastal models due to sharp, energetic fronts. We compare on- and offline estimates of numerical mixing in a submesoscale-resolving realistic simulation of the ocean state over the Texas-Louisiana continental shelf. While offline estimates of numerical mixing differ from online estimates, offline methods may be the only analysis available. We use two methods to estimate numerical mixing offline based on the residuals of the salinity squared s2 and volume-mean salinity variance budgets. The budget overestimates the time-averaged online numerical mixing by 60% at hourly output. The s2 budget compares poorly due to large truncation errors associated with the tendency and advection terms. The residual of the s2 budget starts to converge to the budget as output frequency increases to 10 min—an unrealistic frequency for long-term coastal ocean simulations—but neither method unconditionally converges to the online method and therefore cannot be recommended for generic analysis of numerical mixing. We also investigate the effects of horizontal resolution on numerical mixing using a two-way nested grid with the online method. The volume-integrated numerical mixing constitutes 57% of the bulk physical mixing—the mixing prescribed by the turbulence closure scheme—in the coarse model and may exceed the physical mixing by half an order of magnitude. We find numerical mixing is reduced by 35% on average in the nested model, likely due to new dynamical processes that emerge in the nested simulation.

Abstract Image

利用盐度方差预算量化沿海海洋模式中的物理和数值混合
数值混合,即主要由平流的离散化产生的伪混合,在河口和海岸模式中由于尖锐的高能锋而经常很重要。我们比较了在亚中尺度分辨率的德克萨斯-路易斯安那大陆架海洋状态真实模拟中对数值混合的在线和离线估计。虽然数值混合的离线估计与在线估计不同,但离线方法可能是唯一可用的分析方法。基于盐度平方s2和体积-平均盐度方差预算的残差,我们使用了两种方法来估计离线数值混合。预算将在线数值混合的时间平均值高估了60%。由于与趋势和平流项相关的大截断误差,s2预算比较差。当输出频率增加到10min时,s2预算的残差开始收敛于预算,这对于长期沿海海洋模拟来说是不现实的频率,但两种方法都不能无条件收敛于在线方法,因此不能推荐用于数值混合的一般分析。我们还使用双向嵌套网格在线方法研究了水平分辨率对数值混合的影响。在粗模型中,体积积分数值混合占总体物理混合(湍流闭合方案规定的混合)的57%,并且可能超过物理混合半个数量级。我们发现数值混合在嵌套模型中平均减少了35%,这可能是由于嵌套模拟中出现了新的动力学过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信