FlexMetric bone marrow aspirator yields laboratory and clinically improved results from mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells without centrifugation

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Robert E. Marx, Paul Amailuk, Neel Patel, Andre Ledoux, Dani Stanbouly
{"title":"FlexMetric bone marrow aspirator yields laboratory and clinically improved results from mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells without centrifugation","authors":"Robert E. Marx,&nbsp;Paul Amailuk,&nbsp;Neel Patel,&nbsp;Andre Ledoux,&nbsp;Dani Stanbouly","doi":"10.1002/term.3348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several devices used to harvest stem/progenitor cells from bone marrow are available to clinicians. This study compared three devices measuring stem cell yields and correlating those yields to bone regeneration. A flexible forward aspirating system Marrow Marxman (MM), a straight needle aspirating on withdrawal system Marrow Cellutions (MC), and a straight needle aspirating on withdrawal and centrifuging the aspirate (BMAC) were compared in a side-to-side patient comparison, as well as tissue engineered bone grafts. The FlexMetric system (MM) produced greater CFU-f values compared to the straight needle (MC) Δ = 1083/ml, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and 1225/ml, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 than the BMAC system. This increased stem/progenitor cell yield also translated into a greater radiographic bone density at 6 months Δ = 88.3 Hu, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001 versus MC and Δ = 116.7, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 versus BMAC at 6 months and Δ = 72.2, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and Δ = 93.3, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 at 9 months respectively. The increased stem/progenitor cell yield of the MM system clinically translated into greater bone regeneration as measured by bone volume <i>p</i> &lt; 0.014 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 respectively, trabecular thickness <i>p</i> &lt; 0.007 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.002 respectively, and trabecular separation <i>p</i> = 0.011 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001. A flexible bone marrow aspirator produces higher yields of stem/progenitor cells. Higher yields of stem/progenitor cells translate into greater bone regeneration in tissue engineering. Flexmetric technology produces better bone regeneration due to a forward aspiration concept reducing dilution from peripheral blood and its ability to target lining cells along the inner cortex. Centrifugation systems are not required in tissue engineering procedures involving stem/progenitor cells due to nonviability or functional loss from g-forces.</p>","PeriodicalId":202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","volume":"16 11","pages":"1047-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/term.3348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several devices used to harvest stem/progenitor cells from bone marrow are available to clinicians. This study compared three devices measuring stem cell yields and correlating those yields to bone regeneration. A flexible forward aspirating system Marrow Marxman (MM), a straight needle aspirating on withdrawal system Marrow Cellutions (MC), and a straight needle aspirating on withdrawal and centrifuging the aspirate (BMAC) were compared in a side-to-side patient comparison, as well as tissue engineered bone grafts. The FlexMetric system (MM) produced greater CFU-f values compared to the straight needle (MC) Δ = 1083/ml, p < 0.001 and 1225/ml, p < 0.001 than the BMAC system. This increased stem/progenitor cell yield also translated into a greater radiographic bone density at 6 months Δ = 88.3 Hu, p ≤ 0.001 versus MC and Δ = 116.7, p < 0.001 versus BMAC at 6 months and Δ = 72.2, p < 0.001 and Δ = 93.3, p < 0.001 at 9 months respectively. The increased stem/progenitor cell yield of the MM system clinically translated into greater bone regeneration as measured by bone volume p < 0.014 and p < 0.001 respectively, trabecular thickness p < 0.007 and p < 0.002 respectively, and trabecular separation p = 0.011 and p < 0.001. A flexible bone marrow aspirator produces higher yields of stem/progenitor cells. Higher yields of stem/progenitor cells translate into greater bone regeneration in tissue engineering. Flexmetric technology produces better bone regeneration due to a forward aspiration concept reducing dilution from peripheral blood and its ability to target lining cells along the inner cortex. Centrifugation systems are not required in tissue engineering procedures involving stem/progenitor cells due to nonviability or functional loss from g-forces.

FlexMetric骨髓抽吸器无需离心即可获得实验室和临床改善的间充质干细胞和祖细胞结果
临床医生可以使用几种用于从骨髓中获取干细胞/祖细胞的设备。这项研究比较了三种测量干细胞产量的设备,并将这些产量与骨再生联系起来。在患者侧对侧比较中,比较了骨髓马克思曼(MM)柔性前吸系统、骨髓细胞(MC)直针抽吸系统和直针抽吸离心抽吸系统(BMAC),以及组织工程化骨移植。FlexMetric系统(MM)比直针(MC)产生更高的CFU-f值Δ = 1083/ml, p <0.001和1225/ml, p <比BMAC系统低0.001。这种增加的干细胞/祖细胞产量也转化为6个月时更高的x线骨密度Δ = 88.3 Hu, p≤0.001,相对于MC和Δ = 116.7, p <6个月时BMAC为0.001,Δ = 72.2, p <0.001和Δ = 93.3, p <9个月时分别为0.001。通过骨体积p <测量,MM系统的干细胞/祖细胞产量的增加在临床上转化为更大的骨再生。0.014和p <分别为0.001,小梁厚度p <0.007和p <分别为0.002,小梁分离p = 0.011和p <0.001. 灵活的骨髓吸引器产生更高的干细胞/祖细胞产量。在组织工程中,更高的干细胞/祖细胞产量转化为更高的骨再生。Flexmetric技术产生更好的骨再生,因为它的前向抽吸概念减少了外周血的稀释,并且能够沿内皮层靶向衬细胞。在涉及干细胞/祖细胞的组织工程程序中,由于重力的不生存或功能丧失,不需要离心系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine publishes rapidly and rigorously peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, perspectives, and short communications on topics relevant to the development of therapeutic approaches which combine stem or progenitor cells, biomaterials and scaffolds, growth factors and other bioactive agents, and their respective constructs. All papers should deal with research that has a direct or potential impact on the development of novel clinical approaches for the regeneration or repair of tissues and organs. The journal is multidisciplinary, covering the combination of the principles of life sciences and engineering in efforts to advance medicine and clinical strategies. The journal focuses on the use of cells, materials, and biochemical/mechanical factors in the development of biological functional substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or organ function. The journal publishes research on any tissue or organ and covers all key aspects of the field, including the development of new biomaterials and processing of scaffolds; the use of different types of cells (mainly stem and progenitor cells) and their culture in specific bioreactors; studies in relevant animal models; and clinical trials in human patients performed under strict regulatory and ethical frameworks. Manuscripts describing the use of advanced methods for the characterization of engineered tissues are also of special interest to the journal readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信