Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing

JoNel Newman
{"title":"Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing","authors":"JoNel Newman","doi":"10.1080/00379816.2012.666404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the backdrop of a flurry of legacy projects linked into the 2012 Olympics this article takes the work being done by the archive participants of The Mandeville Legacy project in the South East Region as a way of appraising the recently developed Revisiting Archive Collections (RAC) cataloguing methodology. In order to look at the way that this participative approach to cataloguing has developed, the article first reflects on some of the core professional assumptions that archivists hold about the ‘cataloguing voice’—that it should be single, neutral, informed, anonymous—and considers the way that some recent archive theory and practice has begun to qualify these previous certainties. The development of the Revisiting Collections model, first for museums and then for archives, is then described. Finally, the article summarizes and evaluates the work of the five South East Region record offices which have used RAC over the past 18 months. Each office worked with groups of disabled people to look at selected records reflecting the historical treatment of disability; and then sought to capture the responses and contributions which these generated and to incorporate them within catalogue descriptions.","PeriodicalId":81733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Archivists. Society of Archivists (Great Britain)","volume":"33 1","pages":"57 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Archivists. Society of Archivists (Great Britain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Against the backdrop of a flurry of legacy projects linked into the 2012 Olympics this article takes the work being done by the archive participants of The Mandeville Legacy project in the South East Region as a way of appraising the recently developed Revisiting Archive Collections (RAC) cataloguing methodology. In order to look at the way that this participative approach to cataloguing has developed, the article first reflects on some of the core professional assumptions that archivists hold about the ‘cataloguing voice’—that it should be single, neutral, informed, anonymous—and considers the way that some recent archive theory and practice has begun to qualify these previous certainties. The development of the Revisiting Collections model, first for museums and then for archives, is then described. Finally, the article summarizes and evaluates the work of the five South East Region record offices which have used RAC over the past 18 months. Each office worked with groups of disabled people to look at selected records reflecting the historical treatment of disability; and then sought to capture the responses and contributions which these generated and to incorporate them within catalogue descriptions.
重访档案馆藏:参与式编目模式的发展
在与2012年奥运会相关的一系列遗产项目的背景下,本文以东南地区曼德维尔遗产项目的档案参与者所做的工作作为评估最近开发的重新访问档案收藏(RAC)编目方法的一种方式。为了了解这种参与式编目方法是如何发展起来的,本文首先反思了档案工作者对“编目声音”的一些核心专业假设——它应该是单一的、中立的、知情的、匿名的——并考虑了一些最近的档案理论和实践已经开始对这些先前的确定性进行限制的方式。然后描述了重访馆藏模式的发展,首先是博物馆,然后是档案馆。最后,文章总结和评价了过去18个月使用RAC的五个东南地区档案局的工作。每个办公室都与残疾人团体合作,查看反映残疾人历史待遇的选定记录;然后试图捕捉这些产生的反应和贡献并将它们纳入目录描述中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信