Reflections on the Value of Metadata Archaeology for Recordkeeping in a Global, Digital World

Anne J. Gilliland
{"title":"Reflections on the Value of Metadata Archaeology for Recordkeeping in a Global, Digital World","authors":"Anne J. Gilliland","doi":"10.1080/00379816.2011.563934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recordkeeping metadata have been instrumental in constructing and promulgating, as well as reflecting, narratives for their era from antiquity into the digital age across cultures and belief systems. They thus can serve as a critical apparatus for articulating, delimiting and contextualizing the record and the archive on an infinite number of temporal dimensions. The implementations and worldviews of metadata, however, historically are often discontinuous or vary in different periods and settings, making it harder to discern their manifestations and influence. Metadata, and discourse formation around metadata, therefore, deserve and require careful excavation, contextualization, and analysis. The paper proposes using a Foucauldian ‘archaeological’ approach to gain a more nuanced and contextualized understanding of the diversity of metadata and metadata discourses. It illustrates this approach with perhaps one of the earliest of historical cases—that of the Royal Archive at Ebla. … analyzing the history of archival ideas requires listening to the archival discourse of the time or place involved. Archival historical analysis requires revisiting the principal professional discussions that leading archivists had about their work and with each other. It requires hearing again, and understanding within the context of their time, and our own, their assumptions, ideas, and concepts … Archival theory should not be seen as a set of immutable scientific laws disinterestedly formed and holding true for all time … Terry Cook, 1997.2 … so I bought the field at Anathoth from my cousin Hanamel and weighed out for him seventeen shekels of silver. I signed and sealed the deed, had it witnessed, and weighed out the silver on the scales. I took the deed of purchase – the sealed copy containing the terms and conditions, as well as the unsealed copy—and I gave this deed to Baruch, son of Neriah, the son of Mahseiah, in the presence of my cousin Hanamel and of the witnesses who had signed the deed and all of the Jews sitting in the courtyard of the guard. In their presence I gave Baruch these instructions: ‘This is what the Lord Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Take these documents, both the sealed and unsealed copies of the deed of purchase, and put them in a clay jar so they will last a long time. For this is what the Lord Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Houses, fields and vineyards will again be bought in this land.’ Jeremiah 32: 9-15 3 (written ca. 580 B.C.E. in anticipation of his own exile in Egypt and the exile of the Jewish people in Babylon).","PeriodicalId":81733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Archivists. Society of Archivists (Great Britain)","volume":"32 1","pages":"103 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00379816.2011.563934","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Archivists. Society of Archivists (Great Britain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.563934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Recordkeeping metadata have been instrumental in constructing and promulgating, as well as reflecting, narratives for their era from antiquity into the digital age across cultures and belief systems. They thus can serve as a critical apparatus for articulating, delimiting and contextualizing the record and the archive on an infinite number of temporal dimensions. The implementations and worldviews of metadata, however, historically are often discontinuous or vary in different periods and settings, making it harder to discern their manifestations and influence. Metadata, and discourse formation around metadata, therefore, deserve and require careful excavation, contextualization, and analysis. The paper proposes using a Foucauldian ‘archaeological’ approach to gain a more nuanced and contextualized understanding of the diversity of metadata and metadata discourses. It illustrates this approach with perhaps one of the earliest of historical cases—that of the Royal Archive at Ebla. … analyzing the history of archival ideas requires listening to the archival discourse of the time or place involved. Archival historical analysis requires revisiting the principal professional discussions that leading archivists had about their work and with each other. It requires hearing again, and understanding within the context of their time, and our own, their assumptions, ideas, and concepts … Archival theory should not be seen as a set of immutable scientific laws disinterestedly formed and holding true for all time … Terry Cook, 1997.2 … so I bought the field at Anathoth from my cousin Hanamel and weighed out for him seventeen shekels of silver. I signed and sealed the deed, had it witnessed, and weighed out the silver on the scales. I took the deed of purchase – the sealed copy containing the terms and conditions, as well as the unsealed copy—and I gave this deed to Baruch, son of Neriah, the son of Mahseiah, in the presence of my cousin Hanamel and of the witnesses who had signed the deed and all of the Jews sitting in the courtyard of the guard. In their presence I gave Baruch these instructions: ‘This is what the Lord Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Take these documents, both the sealed and unsealed copies of the deed of purchase, and put them in a clay jar so they will last a long time. For this is what the Lord Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Houses, fields and vineyards will again be bought in this land.’ Jeremiah 32: 9-15 3 (written ca. 580 B.C.E. in anticipation of his own exile in Egypt and the exile of the Jewish people in Babylon).
元数据考古在全球数字世界中记录保存价值的思考
记录保存元数据在构建、发布和反映他们的时代叙事方面发挥了重要作用,从古代到数字时代,跨越文化和信仰体系。因此,它们可以作为一种关键的工具,在无限的时间维度上阐明、界定和背景化记录和档案。然而,从历史上看,元数据的实现和世界观往往是不连续的,或者在不同的时期和环境中有所不同,因此很难辨别它们的表现形式和影响。因此,元数据和围绕元数据的话语形成值得也需要仔细挖掘、语境化和分析。本文建议使用福柯式的“考古学”方法来获得对元数据和元数据话语多样性的更细致和情境化的理解。它用可能是历史上最早的案例之一——埃布拉皇家档案馆——来说明这种方法。分析档案思想史需要倾听相关时间或地点的档案话语。档案历史分析需要重新审视主要档案学家对他们的工作和彼此之间的主要专业讨论。它需要在他们的时代和我们自己的时代背景下再次倾听和理解他们的假设、想法和概念……档案理论不应该被视为一套永恒不变的科学定律……特里·库克,1997.2……所以我从我的表弟哈纳梅尔那里买下了亚拿托的那块地,并为他称了17舍客勒银子。我在契据上签了字,盖了印,请人作见证,又用天平称了银子。我拿着那封了章、写有契约条款的那份和那封没有封的那份,当着我表兄哈拿篾和在契约上签字的见证人,以及坐在护卫院里的所有犹太人的面,把契约交给玛西雅的孙子尼利亚的儿子巴录。我在他们面前吩咐巴录说:‘以色列的上帝、万能之主耶和华说:‘把这些契约,就是那封了印的和没封的,都放在一个瓦器里,使它可以保存很久。因为以色列的上帝、万能之主耶和华说:将来在这地必有人再买房屋、田地和葡萄园。耶利米书32:9 - 15:3(写于公元前580年左右,他预计自己将被流放到埃及,犹太人将被流放到巴比伦)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信