Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory

J. Lowry
{"title":"Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory","authors":"J. Lowry","doi":"10.1080/00379816.2011.555635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bastian and Alexander have arranged this collection of essays on community archives into five parts, beginning with two essays that contextualise what follows, socially (Flinn and Stevens) and historically (Mander’s overview of the development of community archives in Britain). The second part, Communities and Non-traditional Record Keeping, begins with The Single Noongar Claim: Native Title, Archival Records and Aboriginal Community in Western Australia, an edited version of Glen Kelly’s address to the I-CHORA IV conference in Perth, Australia. Informal in tone, the paper traces the process of gathering and assessing evidence in support of a native title claim, including anthropological and pseudo-anthropological sources. Kelly discusses the records produced by the office of the Protector of Aborigines and the Christian missions, including the ‘caste cards’ that were ‘used to track the caste or blood quantum of people’, to classify them ‘native or not’. Kelly shows how the record now runs contrary to the intentions of the record makers and the fears of the subjects of the records; in documenting a ‘dying race’ the white anthropologists and clerks of the native welfare system created records that would be used to claim indigenous sovereignty, while, having learnt not to speak to white visitors, the Noongars created a gap in the record that would weaken the claim made by their descendants. Patricia Galloway’s Oral Tradition in Living Cultures: the Role of Archives in the Preservation of Memory is similarly well-situated in this part. Exploring two very different communities’ relation with the ‘other’ system of information exchange, Galloway demonstrates that across communities a diversity of modes of transmission are being adopted and will continue to work in conjunction with others. The two communities examined by the author are medical students, shown to be embedded in a ‘literate context’ but engaged in the oral transmission of mnemonics that aid in the study of anatomy, and the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians who are adopting writing to preserve a formerly exclusively oral language. Eric Ketelaar’s A Living Archive, Shared by Communities of Records, appears in Part Three, Records Loss, Destruction and Recovery. Ketelaar’s reputation as a leading theorist in the field of archival science is upheld in this expertly conceived and Journal of the Society of Archivists Vol. 32, No. 1, April 2011, 161–166","PeriodicalId":81733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Archivists. Society of Archivists (Great Britain)","volume":"32 1","pages":"161 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00379816.2011.555635","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Archivists. Society of Archivists (Great Britain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.555635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Bastian and Alexander have arranged this collection of essays on community archives into five parts, beginning with two essays that contextualise what follows, socially (Flinn and Stevens) and historically (Mander’s overview of the development of community archives in Britain). The second part, Communities and Non-traditional Record Keeping, begins with The Single Noongar Claim: Native Title, Archival Records and Aboriginal Community in Western Australia, an edited version of Glen Kelly’s address to the I-CHORA IV conference in Perth, Australia. Informal in tone, the paper traces the process of gathering and assessing evidence in support of a native title claim, including anthropological and pseudo-anthropological sources. Kelly discusses the records produced by the office of the Protector of Aborigines and the Christian missions, including the ‘caste cards’ that were ‘used to track the caste or blood quantum of people’, to classify them ‘native or not’. Kelly shows how the record now runs contrary to the intentions of the record makers and the fears of the subjects of the records; in documenting a ‘dying race’ the white anthropologists and clerks of the native welfare system created records that would be used to claim indigenous sovereignty, while, having learnt not to speak to white visitors, the Noongars created a gap in the record that would weaken the claim made by their descendants. Patricia Galloway’s Oral Tradition in Living Cultures: the Role of Archives in the Preservation of Memory is similarly well-situated in this part. Exploring two very different communities’ relation with the ‘other’ system of information exchange, Galloway demonstrates that across communities a diversity of modes of transmission are being adopted and will continue to work in conjunction with others. The two communities examined by the author are medical students, shown to be embedded in a ‘literate context’ but engaged in the oral transmission of mnemonics that aid in the study of anatomy, and the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians who are adopting writing to preserve a formerly exclusively oral language. Eric Ketelaar’s A Living Archive, Shared by Communities of Records, appears in Part Three, Records Loss, Destruction and Recovery. Ketelaar’s reputation as a leading theorist in the field of archival science is upheld in this expertly conceived and Journal of the Society of Archivists Vol. 32, No. 1, April 2011, 161–166
社区档案:记忆的塑造
巴斯蒂安(Bastian)和亚历山大(Alexander)将这本关于社区档案的文集整理成五个部分,首先是两篇文章,它们将接下来的内容置于社会背景下(弗林(flynn)和史蒂文斯(Stevens))和历史背景下(曼德(Mander)对英国社区档案发展的概述)。第二部分,社区和非传统的记录保存,从单一的努加人索赔开始:西澳大利亚的土著所有权,档案记录和土著社区,这是格伦凯利在澳大利亚珀斯举行的I-CHORA第四次会议上的讲话的编辑版本。非正式的语气,论文追溯了收集和评估证据的过程,以支持土著所有权主张,包括人类学和伪人类学的来源。凯利讨论了原住民保护者办公室和基督教传教会制作的记录,包括“种姓卡”,“用来追踪人们的种姓或血统”,将他们分类为“本地人或非本地人”。凯利展示了现在的记录是如何与记录制作者的意图和记录对象的恐惧背道而驰的;在记录一个“垂死的种族”时,白人人类学家和当地福利系统的工作人员创造了用来宣称土著主权的记录,同时,由于学会了不和白人游客说话,努格尔人在记录中制造了一个空白,削弱了他们后代的主张。帕特丽夏·加洛韦的《现存文化中的口述传统:档案在保存记忆中的作用》在这一部分也有很好的定位。Galloway探讨了两个非常不同的社区与“其他”信息交换系统的关系,表明在各个社区中正在采用多种传播模式,并将继续与其他模式协同工作。作者考察的两个群体是医学院的学生,他们被证明是在一个“识字的环境”中,但从事有助于解剖学研究的口头记忆法的传播,以及密西西比乔克托族印第安人,他们采用文字来保存以前专门的口头语言。Eric Ketelaar的《记录社区共享的生活档案》出现在第三部分,记录的丢失、破坏和恢复。Ketelaar作为档案科学领域的领先理论家的声誉在这一专业构想和《档案工作者学会杂志》(Journal of Archivists) Vol. 32, No. 1, 2011年4月,161-166中得到了维护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信