Mismatch between conservation needs and actual representation of lions from West and Central Africa in in situ and ex situ conservation

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Fleur Visser, Marine Drouilly, Yoshan Moodley, Johan R. Michaux, Michael J. Somers
{"title":"Mismatch between conservation needs and actual representation of lions from West and Central Africa in in situ and ex situ conservation","authors":"Fleur Visser,&nbsp;Marine Drouilly,&nbsp;Yoshan Moodley,&nbsp;Johan R. Michaux,&nbsp;Michael J. Somers","doi":"10.1111/conl.12949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mismatches between conservation action and conservation needs have been highlighted for diverse species. Lion (<i>Panthera leo</i>) conservation is no exception, raising the question of whether current conservation strategies are always adequate to ensure the long-term persistence of threatened taxa.</p><p>To investigate the representation of different lion Evolutionary Significant Units in field research, captive populations, funding allocation, and education, we carried out a literature review and sent an online questionnaire to zoos worldwide. Over 75% of the publications focused on southern and eastern African populations. Uplisting the West African lion to Critically Endangered did not change this result. We received 88 responses from zoos, which reported 346 lions in 83 zoos. Only 14 individuals have West and Central African origins. Over 70% of the respondents reported that they do not include any information on the conservation status or taxonomy of lions from West and Central Africa in their education programs. The minority of zoos funding in situ lion projects did so in Eastern and Southern Africa. We provide recommendations to encourage role-players involved in lion and other threatened species conservation to address this mismatch by shifting some of their attention and funding to West and Central Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12949","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12949","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mismatches between conservation action and conservation needs have been highlighted for diverse species. Lion (Panthera leo) conservation is no exception, raising the question of whether current conservation strategies are always adequate to ensure the long-term persistence of threatened taxa.

To investigate the representation of different lion Evolutionary Significant Units in field research, captive populations, funding allocation, and education, we carried out a literature review and sent an online questionnaire to zoos worldwide. Over 75% of the publications focused on southern and eastern African populations. Uplisting the West African lion to Critically Endangered did not change this result. We received 88 responses from zoos, which reported 346 lions in 83 zoos. Only 14 individuals have West and Central African origins. Over 70% of the respondents reported that they do not include any information on the conservation status or taxonomy of lions from West and Central Africa in their education programs. The minority of zoos funding in situ lion projects did so in Eastern and Southern Africa. We provide recommendations to encourage role-players involved in lion and other threatened species conservation to address this mismatch by shifting some of their attention and funding to West and Central Africa.

保护需求与西非和中非狮子在原地和非原地保护中的实际表现不匹配
保护行动与保护需求之间的不匹配在不同物种中得到了突出体现。狮子(Panthera leo)的保护也不例外,这就提出了一个问题,即当前的保护策略是否总是足以确保受威胁分类群的长期存在。为了调查不同狮子进化重要单位在野外研究、圈养种群、资金分配和教育方面的代表性,我们进行了文献综述,并向世界各地的动物园发送了在线问卷。75%以上的出版物以南部和东部非洲人口为重点。将西非狮列为极度濒危物种并没有改变这一结果。我们收到了88个动物园的回复,其中83个动物园报告了346头狮子。只有14人有西非和中非血统。超过70%的受访者报告说,他们的教育计划中没有包括任何关于西非和中非狮子的保护状况或分类的信息。在非洲东部和南部,只有少数动物园资助原位狮子项目。我们提供了一些建议,鼓励参与狮子和其他濒危物种保护的角色参与者通过将他们的一些注意力和资金转移到西非和中非来解决这种不匹配问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信