Managing ecosystem services in broadacre landscapes: what are the appropriate spatial scales?

N. Schellhorn, S. Macfadyen, F. Bianchi, David G. Williams, M. Zalucki
{"title":"Managing ecosystem services in broadacre landscapes: what are the appropriate spatial scales?","authors":"N. Schellhorn, S. Macfadyen, F. Bianchi, David G. Williams, M. Zalucki","doi":"10.1071/EA08112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past 200 years agriculture has expanded throughout Australia. The culmination of clearing and cultivating land at the farm scale has resulted in highly modified landscapes and a perceived loss of ecosystem services from pest control and pollination. We examine the literature: (i) to identify the appropriate spatial scale for managing pests, natural enemies and pollinators; and (ii) for evidence that farm-scale changes (due to agricultural intensification) across a landscape have resulted in a tipping point favouring pests and hindering pollinators. Although there is limited information to draw firm conclusions, the evidence suggests that actions undertaken on individual farms have an impact both on their neighbours and regionally, and that the culmination of these actions can lead to changes in population dynamics of pests, natural enemies and pollinators. For major pest species, there is reasonable evidence that grain growers may benefit from improved management and higher yields by implementing area-wide pest management strategies on a landscape scale in collaboration with growers of other crops that also share these pests. As yet, for natural enemies and pollinators there is little direct evidence that similar area-wide initiatives will have a greater effect than management strategies aimed at the field and farm level. Managing pests, natural enemies and pollinators beyond the scale of the field or farm is technically and socially challenging and will required a well defined research agenda, as well as compromise, balance and trading among stakeholders. We highlight critical knowledge gaps and suggest approaches for designing and managing landscapes for ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":8636,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","volume":"48 1","pages":"1549-1559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/EA08112","citationCount":"90","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

Abstract

Over the past 200 years agriculture has expanded throughout Australia. The culmination of clearing and cultivating land at the farm scale has resulted in highly modified landscapes and a perceived loss of ecosystem services from pest control and pollination. We examine the literature: (i) to identify the appropriate spatial scale for managing pests, natural enemies and pollinators; and (ii) for evidence that farm-scale changes (due to agricultural intensification) across a landscape have resulted in a tipping point favouring pests and hindering pollinators. Although there is limited information to draw firm conclusions, the evidence suggests that actions undertaken on individual farms have an impact both on their neighbours and regionally, and that the culmination of these actions can lead to changes in population dynamics of pests, natural enemies and pollinators. For major pest species, there is reasonable evidence that grain growers may benefit from improved management and higher yields by implementing area-wide pest management strategies on a landscape scale in collaboration with growers of other crops that also share these pests. As yet, for natural enemies and pollinators there is little direct evidence that similar area-wide initiatives will have a greater effect than management strategies aimed at the field and farm level. Managing pests, natural enemies and pollinators beyond the scale of the field or farm is technically and socially challenging and will required a well defined research agenda, as well as compromise, balance and trading among stakeholders. We highlight critical knowledge gaps and suggest approaches for designing and managing landscapes for ecosystem services.
管理大面积景观中的生态系统服务:什么是合适的空间尺度?
在过去的200年里,农业在澳大利亚遍地开花。在农场规模上清理和耕种土地的高潮导致了高度改变的景观和虫害控制和授粉的生态系统服务的明显丧失。我们对文献进行了研究:(1)确定适当的空间尺度来管理害虫、天敌和传粉媒介;(ii)有证据表明,整个景观的农场规模变化(由于农业集约化)导致了一个有利于害虫和阻碍传粉媒介的临界点。虽然能够得出确切结论的信息有限,但有证据表明,个别农场采取的行动对其邻居和区域都有影响,这些行动的最终结果可能导致害虫、天敌和传粉媒介的种群动态变化。对于主要病虫害物种,有合理证据表明,通过与其他作物的种植者合作,在景观规模上实施全区域病虫害管理战略,粮食种植者可以从改善管理和提高产量中受益。到目前为止,对于天敌和传粉者来说,几乎没有直接证据表明类似的区域性举措会比针对田地和农场的管理策略产生更大的效果。在田间或农场之外管理害虫、天敌和传粉媒介在技术上和社会上都具有挑战性,需要制定明确的研究议程,以及利益攸关方之间的妥协、平衡和交易。我们强调了关键的知识差距,并提出了设计和管理生态系统服务景观的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信