Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers

I. Hwang, R. Polkinghorne, Jong-Moon Lee, J. Thompson
{"title":"Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers","authors":"I. Hwang, R. Polkinghorne, Jong-Moon Lee, J. Thompson","doi":"10.1071/EA05113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data from 648 beef samples, which had been sensory tested by 720 Korean and 540 Australian consumers were used to quantify design and demographic effects on beef sensory scores. The samples were from 36 carcasses, where sides had been either hung by the Achilles tendon or hip suspended. At boning, samples from three muscles (M. triceps brachii, M. longissimus dorsi and M. semimembranosus) were prepared and cooked by either grill (25-mm-thick steaks) or Korean barbeque (BBQ, 4-mm-thick samples) methods. A Latin square design was used to allocate samples to different presentation orders to be tasted in association with different samples. For both cooking techniques each consumer tested a starter sample followed by six experimental samples, with each sample being tasted by 10 different consumers. Design (taste panel, session, order, carry-over, sample and consumer) and demographic (age class, gender, occupation, frequency of eating meat, number of adults and children living in the house, their appreciation of meat and degree of doneness and income) effects were examined separately for tenderness, juiciness, like flavour, overall liking and a composite palatability score, within the four consumer group/cooking method subclasses. For grill samples, order of presentation was significant for most sensory variables. For BBQ samples, order of presentation failed to achieve significance for Australian consumers, but was significant (P   0.05) for all consumer group/cooking methods. Correlations between raw scores and those adjusted for design and demographic effects ranged from 0.93 to 0.99, indicating that if the design was balanced, or nearly balanced for design effects, then further adjustment of sensory scores was not necessary. Clipping 40% of outlying consumer scores reduced the variance of the sample mean by ~30%.","PeriodicalId":8636,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/EA05113","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Data from 648 beef samples, which had been sensory tested by 720 Korean and 540 Australian consumers were used to quantify design and demographic effects on beef sensory scores. The samples were from 36 carcasses, where sides had been either hung by the Achilles tendon or hip suspended. At boning, samples from three muscles (M. triceps brachii, M. longissimus dorsi and M. semimembranosus) were prepared and cooked by either grill (25-mm-thick steaks) or Korean barbeque (BBQ, 4-mm-thick samples) methods. A Latin square design was used to allocate samples to different presentation orders to be tasted in association with different samples. For both cooking techniques each consumer tested a starter sample followed by six experimental samples, with each sample being tasted by 10 different consumers. Design (taste panel, session, order, carry-over, sample and consumer) and demographic (age class, gender, occupation, frequency of eating meat, number of adults and children living in the house, their appreciation of meat and degree of doneness and income) effects were examined separately for tenderness, juiciness, like flavour, overall liking and a composite palatability score, within the four consumer group/cooking method subclasses. For grill samples, order of presentation was significant for most sensory variables. For BBQ samples, order of presentation failed to achieve significance for Australian consumers, but was significant (P   0.05) for all consumer group/cooking methods. Correlations between raw scores and those adjusted for design and demographic effects ranged from 0.93 to 0.99, indicating that if the design was balanced, or nearly balanced for design effects, then further adjustment of sensory scores was not necessary. Clipping 40% of outlying consumer scores reduced the variance of the sample mean by ~30%.
人口统计学和设计对韩国和澳大利亚消费者给出的牛肉感官评分的影响
来自648份牛肉样本的数据被720名韩国和540名澳大利亚消费者用于感官测试,以量化设计和人口统计学对牛肉感官评分的影响。这些样本来自36具尸体,尸体的两侧要么被跟腱悬挂起来,要么被臀部悬挂起来。在入骨时,从3块肌肉(肱三头肌、背最长肌和半膜肌)中提取样本,并通过烧烤(25毫米厚的牛排)或韩国烧烤(4毫米厚的样品)方法进行烹饪。使用拉丁方形设计将样品分配到不同的呈现顺序,以便与不同的样品一起品尝。对于这两种烹饪技术,每个消费者都要先测试一个开胃菜,然后再测试六个实验样品,每个样品由10个不同的消费者品尝。在四个消费者群体/烹饪方法子类中,分别检查了设计(口味面板,会议,订单,结转,样本和消费者)和人口统计(年龄阶层,性别,职业,吃肉频率,住在房子里的成年人和儿童的数量,他们对肉的欣赏程度和熟度以及收入)的影响,包括嫩度,多汁性,风味,总体喜欢度和综合适口性评分。对于烧烤样品,呈现顺序对大多数感官变量都是显著的。对于BBQ样品,呈现顺序对于澳大利亚消费者来说没有达到显著性,但对于所有消费者群体/烹饪方法来说都是显著的(P 0.05)。原始得分与根据设计和人口统计学效应调整后的得分之间的相关性在0.93到0.99之间,这表明如果设计是平衡的,或者接近平衡的,那么就没有必要进一步调整感官得分。剔除40%的外围消费者得分将样本均值的方差降低了约30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信