DE OPVATTING VAN HET HUWELIJK IN HET ONTWERP VOOR EEN NIEUW CANONIEK HUWELIJKSRECHT

P. Huizing
{"title":"DE OPVATTING VAN HET HUWELIJK IN HET ONTWERP VOOR EEN NIEUW CANONIEK HUWELIJKSRECHT","authors":"P. Huizing","doi":"10.1080/00062278.1977.10597131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY The Pontifical Committee for the Revision of Canon Law presently reviews suggestions and amendments on their latest drafts of sacramental law, esp. marriage law. The main criticism concerns the very definition of marriage. The committee, so the critique goes, has mixed up the contractual view of marriage with the personalistic view. The former claims both ontological and theological validity, the latter has no such claims. The draft has allowed for only those personalistic elements which admit legal treatment, e.g. the bond of husband and wife, the unity of marital love and its procreative aim; yet other elements, e.g. personal surrender and love have been omitted. This author believes a personalistic type of marriage law should be developed. In fact, true Christian law originates where the opposition between law and love has been overcome. One frightful consequence of personalistic marriage laws is the breakdown of traditional distinctions, e.g. between valid and invalid marriages. Indissolubilit...","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00062278.1977.10597131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00062278.1977.10597131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY The Pontifical Committee for the Revision of Canon Law presently reviews suggestions and amendments on their latest drafts of sacramental law, esp. marriage law. The main criticism concerns the very definition of marriage. The committee, so the critique goes, has mixed up the contractual view of marriage with the personalistic view. The former claims both ontological and theological validity, the latter has no such claims. The draft has allowed for only those personalistic elements which admit legal treatment, e.g. the bond of husband and wife, the unity of marital love and its procreative aim; yet other elements, e.g. personal surrender and love have been omitted. This author believes a personalistic type of marriage law should be developed. In fact, true Christian law originates where the opposition between law and love has been overcome. One frightful consequence of personalistic marriage laws is the breakdown of traditional distinctions, e.g. between valid and invalid marriages. Indissolubilit...
新婚姻法草案中对婚姻的看法
宗座教会法修订委员会现正检讨有关圣事法,特别是婚姻法最新草案的建议和修订。主要的批评是关于婚姻的定义。批评者认为,委员会混淆了婚姻观的契约观和个人主义观。前者主张本体论和神学的有效性,后者没有这样的主张。草案只允许那些可以接受法律处理的个人因素,例如丈夫和妻子的结合、婚姻之爱及其生育目的的统一;然而其他的元素,例如个人的降服和爱却被忽略了。笔者认为,我国应发展人格型婚姻法。事实上,真正的基督教律法起源于法律与爱之间的对立已经被克服。个人主义婚姻法的一个可怕后果是打破了传统的区别,例如有效婚姻和无效婚姻之间的区别。Indissolubilit……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信