Documenting things: bringing archival thinking to interdisciplinary collaborations

Michael Jones
{"title":"Documenting things: bringing archival thinking to interdisciplinary collaborations","authors":"Michael Jones","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2016.1204976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Unlike many archival organisations, the University of Melbourne’s eScholarship Research Centre (ESRC) is not a custodial repository or a teaching facility. This allows the centre to collaborate with a wide range of organisations and individuals, bringing archival thinking and practice to a variety of sectors, many of which are not traditionally associated with information professionals. Central to all the ESRC’s work is the importance of effectively documenting things and their context. This paper draws on project examples, the author’s PhD research and key concepts from archival and knowledge management theory to explore the idea that effective documentation requires more than a focus on items and collections. Instead, it requires working with individuals, organisations and documentary resources (published and unpublished) to reveal explicit connections and capture implicit knowledge in ways which more accurately reflect the complexity of collections and the entities needed to understand them. These ideas are introduced using two examples: a series of projects carried out over many years with the Victorian Government’s Department of Primary Industries and its successors and The Australian Ballet. The paper then uses key concepts from this work to explore the nature of museum documentation and some of the limitations of current practice in museums, including the specific example of the Nordström mining models held by Museum Victoria. Thinking about these issues in the digital world, and applying archival thinking, the author argues for better connections between collection materials, not through convergence but by expanding our concept of collection documentation to include the relationships between things as things in their own right. Arguing for the practical benefits of such a change, the paper concludes by suggesting that testing these ideas in a museum context has the potential to further develop the ideas of the ESRC in ways which will benefit society.","PeriodicalId":82953,"journal":{"name":"The Australian library journal","volume":"65 1","pages":"213 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049670.2016.1204976","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian library journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2016.1204976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Unlike many archival organisations, the University of Melbourne’s eScholarship Research Centre (ESRC) is not a custodial repository or a teaching facility. This allows the centre to collaborate with a wide range of organisations and individuals, bringing archival thinking and practice to a variety of sectors, many of which are not traditionally associated with information professionals. Central to all the ESRC’s work is the importance of effectively documenting things and their context. This paper draws on project examples, the author’s PhD research and key concepts from archival and knowledge management theory to explore the idea that effective documentation requires more than a focus on items and collections. Instead, it requires working with individuals, organisations and documentary resources (published and unpublished) to reveal explicit connections and capture implicit knowledge in ways which more accurately reflect the complexity of collections and the entities needed to understand them. These ideas are introduced using two examples: a series of projects carried out over many years with the Victorian Government’s Department of Primary Industries and its successors and The Australian Ballet. The paper then uses key concepts from this work to explore the nature of museum documentation and some of the limitations of current practice in museums, including the specific example of the Nordström mining models held by Museum Victoria. Thinking about these issues in the digital world, and applying archival thinking, the author argues for better connections between collection materials, not through convergence but by expanding our concept of collection documentation to include the relationships between things as things in their own right. Arguing for the practical benefits of such a change, the paper concludes by suggesting that testing these ideas in a museum context has the potential to further develop the ideas of the ESRC in ways which will benefit society.
记录事物:将档案思维带入跨学科合作
与许多档案组织不同,墨尔本大学的奖学金研究中心(ESRC)不是一个保管库或教学设施。这使得该中心能够与广泛的组织和个人合作,将档案思维和实践带到各个部门,其中许多部门传统上与信息专业人员无关。ESRC所有工作的核心是有效地记录事物及其背景的重要性。本文通过项目实例、作者的博士研究以及档案和知识管理理论中的关键概念来探讨有效的文献记录需要的不仅仅是关注项目和馆藏。相反,它需要与个人,组织和文献资源(已发表和未发表)合作,以更准确地反映集合的复杂性和理解它们所需的实体的方式揭示明确的联系并捕获隐含的知识。这些想法是通过两个例子来介绍的:维多利亚州政府初级产业部及其继任者和澳大利亚芭蕾舞团多年来开展的一系列项目。然后,本文使用这项工作中的关键概念来探索博物馆文献的本质和博物馆当前实践的一些局限性,包括维多利亚博物馆举办的Nordström挖掘模型的具体例子。在数字世界中思考这些问题,并运用档案思维,作者认为馆藏材料之间应该有更好的联系,不是通过融合,而是通过扩展我们对馆藏文档的概念,将事物之间的关系作为它们自身的事物来包括在内。为了论证这种改变的实际好处,论文的结论是,在博物馆的背景下测试这些想法有可能进一步发展ESRC的想法,从而造福社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信