Research within the disciplines: foundations for reference and library instruction (2nd ed.)

Xiang Ren
{"title":"Research within the disciplines: foundations for reference and library instruction (2nd ed.)","authors":"Xiang Ren","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2015.1100290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"information literacy has been taught, practised and studied in limited ways within an institutional framework that does not permit scrutiny of cognitive authority. Understanding the contexts within which people experience information is part of the theory of applied practice that recognises the fundamentally dialogic and political nature of knowledge formation. The author’s view embraces the information landscape as involving libraries, schools, community organisations, activist groups, businesses, classrooms, workplaces, family, media, social networks and many more informal elements, including social and political elements, which communicate and are responsible for knowledge formation. The perspective regarding ‘information landscapes’ is exploratory rather than evaluative, with even libraries coming in for critical evaluation because they demonstrate limited philosophies of knowledge formation. Controversially, the author claims that the concept of radical information landscapes involves an independence from technology. He claims that information and communication technologies, rather than facilitating autonomous learning, may be more accurately identified as an element allowing the informed in society to maintain their capital. The author recognises rapid technological change but holds the view that its value lies in stimulating learning needs, which, in turn, need to be met. High value is also placed on artifacts as an essential part of information; these include practical knowledge, insights, experience, emotional impact, observations, dialogue, technology access and other experiential factors. Factoring in time is also examined, postulating that every epoch is characterised by its singular view of legitimate information and knowledge. Each chapter begins with an abstract and a list of key words with in-text referencing throughout. At the end there is a very lengthy bibliography followed by a detailed index. For readers who have an interest in the theory of information behaviour and are stimulated by challenges to accepted academic frameworks, this is an expansive and rigorous interrogation of the field.","PeriodicalId":82953,"journal":{"name":"The Australian library journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"354 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049670.2015.1100290","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian library journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2015.1100290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

information literacy has been taught, practised and studied in limited ways within an institutional framework that does not permit scrutiny of cognitive authority. Understanding the contexts within which people experience information is part of the theory of applied practice that recognises the fundamentally dialogic and political nature of knowledge formation. The author’s view embraces the information landscape as involving libraries, schools, community organisations, activist groups, businesses, classrooms, workplaces, family, media, social networks and many more informal elements, including social and political elements, which communicate and are responsible for knowledge formation. The perspective regarding ‘information landscapes’ is exploratory rather than evaluative, with even libraries coming in for critical evaluation because they demonstrate limited philosophies of knowledge formation. Controversially, the author claims that the concept of radical information landscapes involves an independence from technology. He claims that information and communication technologies, rather than facilitating autonomous learning, may be more accurately identified as an element allowing the informed in society to maintain their capital. The author recognises rapid technological change but holds the view that its value lies in stimulating learning needs, which, in turn, need to be met. High value is also placed on artifacts as an essential part of information; these include practical knowledge, insights, experience, emotional impact, observations, dialogue, technology access and other experiential factors. Factoring in time is also examined, postulating that every epoch is characterised by its singular view of legitimate information and knowledge. Each chapter begins with an abstract and a list of key words with in-text referencing throughout. At the end there is a very lengthy bibliography followed by a detailed index. For readers who have an interest in the theory of information behaviour and are stimulated by challenges to accepted academic frameworks, this is an expansive and rigorous interrogation of the field.
学科内的研究:参考和图书馆教学的基础(第二版)
在一个不允许审查认知权威的体制框架内,以有限的方式教授、实践和研究信息素养。理解人们体验信息的背景是应用实践理论的一部分,它承认知识形成的基本对话和政治性质。在作者的观点中,信息景观包括图书馆、学校、社区组织、激进团体、企业、教室、工作场所、家庭、媒体、社交网络和许多非正式元素,包括社会和政治元素,它们相互交流并负责知识的形成。关于“信息景观”的观点是探索性的,而不是评估性的,甚至图书馆也要进行批判性的评估,因为它们展示了有限的知识形成哲学。有争议的是,作者声称激进信息景观的概念涉及独立于技术。他声称,信息和通信技术,而不是促进自主学习,可能更准确地确定为一个因素,使知情的社会维持他们的资本。作者承认快速的技术变革,但认为其价值在于激发学习需求,而学习需求又需要得到满足。作为信息的重要组成部分,人工制品也受到高度重视;这些包括实践知识、见解、经验、情感影响、观察、对话、技术获取和其他经验因素。考虑时间因素也被检查,假设每个时代都有其独特的合法信息和知识的观点。每章以摘要和关键词列表开头,并在文本中引用。最后有一个很长的参考书目,后面跟着一个详细的索引。对于对信息行为理论感兴趣的读者来说,这是对公认的学术框架的挑战,这是对该领域的广泛而严格的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信