Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern north America Estructura Espacial y Temporal de un Gremio Mesocarnívoro en el medio oeste de América del Norte Structure Spatio-Temporelle d'une Guilde de Mésocarnivores dans le Midwest Nord Américain

IF 4.3 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Damon B. Lesmeister, Clayton K. Nielsen, Eric M. Schauber, Eric C. Hellgren
{"title":"Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern north America\n Estructura Espacial y Temporal de un Gremio Mesocarnívoro en el medio oeste de América del Norte\n Structure Spatio-Temporelle d'une Guilde de Mésocarnivores dans le Midwest Nord Américain","authors":"Damon B. Lesmeister,&nbsp;Clayton K. Nielsen,&nbsp;Eric M. Schauber,&nbsp;Eric C. Hellgren","doi":"10.1002/wmon.1015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Carnivore guilds play a vital role in ecological communities by cascading trophic effects, energy and nutrient transfer, and stabilizing or destabilizing food webs. Consequently, the structure of carnivore guilds can be critical to ecosystem patterns. Body size is a crucial influence on intraguild interactions, because it affects access to prey resources, effectiveness in scramble competition, and vulnerability to intraguild predation. Coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>), bobcats (<i>Lynx rufus</i>), gray foxes (<i>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</i>), raccoons (<i>Procyon lotor</i>), red foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), and striped skunks (<i>Mephitis mephitis</i>) occur sympatrically throughout much of North America and overlap in resource use, indicating potential for interspecific interactions. Although much is known about the autecology of the individual species separately, little is known about factors that facilitate coexistence and how interactions within this guild influence distribution, habitat use, and temporal activity of the smaller carnivores. To assess how habitat autecology and interspecific interactions affect the structure of this widespread carnivore guild, we conducted a large-scale, non-invasive carnivore survey using an occupancy modeling framework. We deployed remote cameras during 3-week surveys to detect carnivores at 1,118 camera locations in 357 2.6-km<sup>2</sup> sections (3–4 cameras/section composing a cluster) in the 16 southernmost counties of Illinois (16,058 km<sup>2</sup>) during January–April, 2008–2010. We characterized microhabitat at each camera location and landscape-level habitat features for each camera cluster. In a multistage approach, we used information-theoretic methods to evaluate competing models for detection, species-specific habitat occupancy, multispecies co-occupancy, and multiseason (colonization and extinction) occupancy dynamics. We developed occupancy models for each species to represent hypothesized effects of anthropogenic features, prey availability, landscape complexity, and vegetative land cover. We quantified temporal activity patterns of each carnivore species based on their frequency of appearance in photographs. Further, we assessed whether smaller carnivores shifted their diel activity patterns in response to the presence of potential competitors. Of the 102,711 photographs of endothermic animals, we recorded photographs of bobcats (<i>n</i> = 412 photographs), coyotes (<i>n</i> = 1,397), gray foxes (<i>n</i> = 546), raccoons (<i>n</i> = 40,029), red foxes (<i>n</i> = 149), and striped skunks (<i>n</i> = 2,467). Bobcats were active primarily during crepuscular periods, and their activity was reduced with precipitation and higher temperatures. The probability of detecting bobcats decreased after a bobcat photograph was recorded, suggesting avoidance of remote cameras after the first encounter. Across southern Illinois, bobcat occupancy at the camera-location and camera-cluster scale ( = 0.24 ± 0.04, camera cluster  = 0.75 ± 0.06) was negatively influenced by anthropogenic features and infrastructure. Bobcats had high rates of colonization ( = 0.86) and low rates of extinction ( = 0.07), suggesting an expanding population, but agricultural land was less likely to be colonized. Nearly all camera clusters were occupied by coyotes ( = 0.95 ± 0.03). At the local scale, coyote occupancy ( = 0.58 ± 0.03) was higher in hardwood forest stands with open understories than in other areas. Compared to coyotes, gray foxes occupied a smaller portion of the study area ( = 0.13 ± 0.01,  = 0.29 ± 0.03) at all scales. At the scale of the camera cluster, gray fox occupancy was highest in fragmented areas with high proportions of forest, and positively related to anthropogenic features within 100% home-range buffers. Red foxes occupied a similar proportion of the study area as gray foxes ( = 0.12 ± 0.02,  = 0.26 ± 0.04) but were more closely associated with anthropogenic features. Only anthropogenic feature models made up the 90% confidence set at all scales of analysis for red foxes. Extinction probabilities at the scale of the camera cluster were higher for both gray foxes ( = 0.57) and red foxes ( = 0.35) than their colonization rates (gray fox  = 0.16, red fox  = 0.06), suggesting both species may be declining in southern Illinois. Striped skunks occupied a large portion of the study area ( = 0.47 ± 0.01,  = 0.79 ± 0.03) and were associated primarily with anthropogenic features. Raccoons were essentially ubiquitous within the study area, being photographed in 99% of camera clusters. We observed little evidence for spatial partitioning based on interspecific interactions, with the exception of the gray fox-coyote pairs, and found that habitat preferences were more important in structuring the carnivore community. Habitat had a stronger influence on the occupancy of foxes than did the presence of bobcats. However, the level of red fox activity was negatively correlated with bobcat activity. Gray fox occupancy and the number of detections within occupied sites were reduced in camera clusters occupied by coyotes but not bobcat occupancy. Overall, gray fox occupancy was highest at camera locations with fewer hardwood and more conifer trees. However, gray foxes were more likely to occupy camera locations in hardwood stands than conifer stands if coyotes were also present indicating that hardwood stands may enhance gray fox-coyote coexistence. The 2 fox species appeared to co-occur with each other at the local scale more frequently than expected based on their individual selection of habitat. Similarly, occupancy of camera location by red foxes was higher when coyotes were present. These positive spatial associations among canids may be a response to locally high prey abundance or unmeasured habitat variables. Activity levels of raccoons, bobcats, and coyotes were all positively correlated. Overall, our co- occurrence and activity models indicate competitor-driven adjustments in space use among members of a carnivore community might be the exception rather than the norm. Nevertheless, although our results indicate that gray foxes and red foxes currently coexist with bobcats and coyotes, their distribution appears to be contracting on our study area. Coexistence of foxes with larger carnivores may be enhanced by temporal partitioning of activity and by habitat features that reduce vulnerability of intraguild predation. For instance, hardwood stands may contain trees with structure that enhances tree-climbing by gray foxes, a behavior that probably facilitates coexistence with coyotes. Efforts to enhance gray fox populations would likely benefit from increasing the amount of mature oak-hickory forest. Additionally, the varying results from different scales of analyses underscore the importance of considering multiple spatial scales in carnivore community studies. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/wmon.1015","citationCount":"163","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.1015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 163

Abstract

Carnivore guilds play a vital role in ecological communities by cascading trophic effects, energy and nutrient transfer, and stabilizing or destabilizing food webs. Consequently, the structure of carnivore guilds can be critical to ecosystem patterns. Body size is a crucial influence on intraguild interactions, because it affects access to prey resources, effectiveness in scramble competition, and vulnerability to intraguild predation. Coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus), gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), raccoons (Procyon lotor), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) occur sympatrically throughout much of North America and overlap in resource use, indicating potential for interspecific interactions. Although much is known about the autecology of the individual species separately, little is known about factors that facilitate coexistence and how interactions within this guild influence distribution, habitat use, and temporal activity of the smaller carnivores. To assess how habitat autecology and interspecific interactions affect the structure of this widespread carnivore guild, we conducted a large-scale, non-invasive carnivore survey using an occupancy modeling framework. We deployed remote cameras during 3-week surveys to detect carnivores at 1,118 camera locations in 357 2.6-km2 sections (3–4 cameras/section composing a cluster) in the 16 southernmost counties of Illinois (16,058 km2) during January–April, 2008–2010. We characterized microhabitat at each camera location and landscape-level habitat features for each camera cluster. In a multistage approach, we used information-theoretic methods to evaluate competing models for detection, species-specific habitat occupancy, multispecies co-occupancy, and multiseason (colonization and extinction) occupancy dynamics. We developed occupancy models for each species to represent hypothesized effects of anthropogenic features, prey availability, landscape complexity, and vegetative land cover. We quantified temporal activity patterns of each carnivore species based on their frequency of appearance in photographs. Further, we assessed whether smaller carnivores shifted their diel activity patterns in response to the presence of potential competitors. Of the 102,711 photographs of endothermic animals, we recorded photographs of bobcats (n = 412 photographs), coyotes (n = 1,397), gray foxes (n = 546), raccoons (n = 40,029), red foxes (n = 149), and striped skunks (n = 2,467). Bobcats were active primarily during crepuscular periods, and their activity was reduced with precipitation and higher temperatures. The probability of detecting bobcats decreased after a bobcat photograph was recorded, suggesting avoidance of remote cameras after the first encounter. Across southern Illinois, bobcat occupancy at the camera-location and camera-cluster scale ( = 0.24 ± 0.04, camera cluster  = 0.75 ± 0.06) was negatively influenced by anthropogenic features and infrastructure. Bobcats had high rates of colonization ( = 0.86) and low rates of extinction ( = 0.07), suggesting an expanding population, but agricultural land was less likely to be colonized. Nearly all camera clusters were occupied by coyotes ( = 0.95 ± 0.03). At the local scale, coyote occupancy ( = 0.58 ± 0.03) was higher in hardwood forest stands with open understories than in other areas. Compared to coyotes, gray foxes occupied a smaller portion of the study area ( = 0.13 ± 0.01,  = 0.29 ± 0.03) at all scales. At the scale of the camera cluster, gray fox occupancy was highest in fragmented areas with high proportions of forest, and positively related to anthropogenic features within 100% home-range buffers. Red foxes occupied a similar proportion of the study area as gray foxes ( = 0.12 ± 0.02,  = 0.26 ± 0.04) but were more closely associated with anthropogenic features. Only anthropogenic feature models made up the 90% confidence set at all scales of analysis for red foxes. Extinction probabilities at the scale of the camera cluster were higher for both gray foxes ( = 0.57) and red foxes ( = 0.35) than their colonization rates (gray fox  = 0.16, red fox  = 0.06), suggesting both species may be declining in southern Illinois. Striped skunks occupied a large portion of the study area ( = 0.47 ± 0.01,  = 0.79 ± 0.03) and were associated primarily with anthropogenic features. Raccoons were essentially ubiquitous within the study area, being photographed in 99% of camera clusters. We observed little evidence for spatial partitioning based on interspecific interactions, with the exception of the gray fox-coyote pairs, and found that habitat preferences were more important in structuring the carnivore community. Habitat had a stronger influence on the occupancy of foxes than did the presence of bobcats. However, the level of red fox activity was negatively correlated with bobcat activity. Gray fox occupancy and the number of detections within occupied sites were reduced in camera clusters occupied by coyotes but not bobcat occupancy. Overall, gray fox occupancy was highest at camera locations with fewer hardwood and more conifer trees. However, gray foxes were more likely to occupy camera locations in hardwood stands than conifer stands if coyotes were also present indicating that hardwood stands may enhance gray fox-coyote coexistence. The 2 fox species appeared to co-occur with each other at the local scale more frequently than expected based on their individual selection of habitat. Similarly, occupancy of camera location by red foxes was higher when coyotes were present. These positive spatial associations among canids may be a response to locally high prey abundance or unmeasured habitat variables. Activity levels of raccoons, bobcats, and coyotes were all positively correlated. Overall, our co- occurrence and activity models indicate competitor-driven adjustments in space use among members of a carnivore community might be the exception rather than the norm. Nevertheless, although our results indicate that gray foxes and red foxes currently coexist with bobcats and coyotes, their distribution appears to be contracting on our study area. Coexistence of foxes with larger carnivores may be enhanced by temporal partitioning of activity and by habitat features that reduce vulnerability of intraguild predation. For instance, hardwood stands may contain trees with structure that enhances tree-climbing by gray foxes, a behavior that probably facilitates coexistence with coyotes. Efforts to enhance gray fox populations would likely benefit from increasing the amount of mature oak-hickory forest. Additionally, the varying results from different scales of analyses underscore the importance of considering multiple spatial scales in carnivore community studies. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.

北美中西部中食肉动物协会的时空结构北美中西部中食肉动物协会的时空结构北美中西部中食肉动物协会的时空结构
食肉动物行会通过级联营养效应、能量和营养转移以及稳定或破坏食物网在生态群落中起着至关重要的作用。因此,食肉动物行会的结构对生态系统模式至关重要。体型大小影响着猎物资源的获取、争夺竞争的有效性以及对内部捕食的脆弱性,因此对内部相互作用具有至关重要的影响。土狼(Canis latrans)、山猫(Lynx rufus)、灰狐(Urocyon cinereoargenteus)、浣熊(Procyon lotor)、红狐(Vulpes Vulpes)和条纹臭鼬(Mephitis Mephitis)在北美的大部分地区都是对称分布的,并且在资源利用上有重叠,表明可能存在种间相互作用。尽管人们对单个物种的生存习性了解甚多,但对促进共存的因素以及群落内的相互作用如何影响小型食肉动物的分布、栖息地利用和时间活动知之甚少。为了评估栖息地技术和种间相互作用如何影响这个广泛存在的食肉动物群体的结构,我们使用占用模型框架进行了一项大规模的非侵入性食肉动物调查。2008年1月至2010年4月,我们在伊利诺伊州最南端16个县(16,058平方公里)357个2.6平方公里区域(3-4个摄像头/区域组成一个集群)的1118个摄像头位置部署了远程摄像头,为期3周的调查中检测食肉动物。我们对每个相机位置的微生境和每个相机集群的景观级生境特征进行了表征。在多阶段方法中,我们使用信息理论方法评估了检测、物种特异性栖息地占用、多物种共占用和多季节(定殖和灭绝)占用动态的竞争模型。我们为每个物种建立了占用模型,以代表人类活动特征、猎物可用性、景观复杂性和植被覆盖的假设影响。我们根据每个食肉动物在照片中的出现频率量化了它们的时间活动模式。此外,我们评估了小型食肉动物是否会因潜在竞争对手的存在而改变其饮食活动模式。在102,711张吸热动物的照片中,我们记录了山猫(n = 412)、土狼(n = 1,397)、灰狐(n = 546)、浣熊(n = 4029)、红狐(n = 149)和条纹臭鼬(n = 2,467)的照片。山猫主要在黄昏时活动,它们的活动随着降水和温度的升高而减少。在山猫的照片被记录下来后,发现山猫的可能性降低了,这表明在第一次遇到山猫后避免使用远程相机。在整个伊利诺伊州南部,山猫在摄像机位置和摄像机群尺度上的占用率(= 0.24±0.04,摄像机群= 0.75±0.06)受到人为特征和基础设施的负面影响。山猫的殖民化率高(= 0.86),灭绝率低(= 0.07),表明人口在不断扩大,但农业用地不太可能被殖民化。几乎所有的相机群都被土狼占据(= 0.95±0.03)。在局地尺度上,阔叶林林分的土狼占用率(= 0.58±0.03)高于其他林分;与土狼相比,灰狐在各尺度上的占比均较小(= 0.13±0.01,= 0.29±0.03)。在相机群尺度上,森林比例高的破碎区灰狐的占用率最高,在100%的家园范围内,灰狐的占用率与人为特征呈正相关。红狐与灰狐占据的研究区域比例相近(= 0.12±0.02,= 0.26±0.04),但与人类活动特征的关系更为密切。在所有分析尺度上,只有人为特征模型构成了90%的置信度集。灰狐(= 0.57)和红狐(= 0.35)的灭绝概率高于它们的定殖率(灰狐= 0.16,红狐= 0.06),这表明这两个物种可能在伊利诺伊州南部正在下降。条纹臭鼬占据了研究区域的很大一部分(= 0.47±0.01,= 0.79±0.03),主要与人为特征相关。在研究区域,浣熊基本上无处不在,99%的相机群都拍摄到了浣熊。除了灰狐-土狼对外,我们几乎没有观察到基于种间相互作用的空间划分证据,并且发现栖息地偏好在构建食肉动物群落中更为重要。与山猫的存在相比,生境对狐狸的占用率有更大的影响。而红狐的活动水平与山猫的活动水平呈负相关。 灰狐的占用率和被占用地点内的检测数量在被土狼占用的相机群中减少,而山猫的占用率没有减少。总体而言,在阔叶树较少、针叶树较多的拍摄地点,灰狐的占用率最高。然而,如果土狼也存在,灰狐更有可能占据硬木林中的相机位置,而不是针叶林,这表明硬木林可促进灰狐与土狼的共存。这两种狐种在局部尺度上的共存频率高于基于个体栖息地选择的预期。同样,当土狼在场时,红狐对相机位置的占用率更高。犬科动物之间的这些积极的空间关联可能是对当地高猎物丰度或未测量的栖息地变量的反应。浣熊、山猫和土狼的活动水平都呈正相关。总的来说,我们的共发生和活动模型表明,食肉动物群落成员之间竞争驱动的空间利用调整可能是例外,而不是常态。然而,尽管我们的研究结果表明灰狐和红狐目前与山猫和土狼共存,但它们在我们研究区域的分布似乎正在缩小。狐狸与大型食肉动物的共存可能由于活动的时间划分和栖息地特征降低了野外捕食的脆弱性而得到加强。例如,硬木林可能含有一些结构有利于灰狐爬树的树木,这种行为可能有助于与土狼共存。提高灰狐种群数量的努力可能会受益于增加成熟橡树山核桃林的数量。此外,不同尺度分析的不同结果强调了在食肉动物群落研究中考虑多空间尺度的重要性。©2015野生动物协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Monographs
Wildlife Monographs 生物-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wildlife Monographs supplements The Journal of Wildlife Management with focused investigations in the area of the management and conservation of wildlife. Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) CAB Abstracts® (CABI) Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database (ProQuest) Global Health (CABI) Grasslands & Forage Abstracts (CABI) Helminthological Abstracts (CABI) Natural Science Collection (ProQuest) Poultry Abstracts (CABI) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Central K-543 Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library Prep (ProQuest) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts (CABI) Veterinary Bulletin (CABI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信