{"title":"Battle of the bugs: how an oomycete pathogen shapes the microbiota of its host","authors":"Hanna Rovenich, Bart P. H. J. Thomma","doi":"10.1111/nph.19133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plants harbor a complex community of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes in their above- and belowground tissues, collectively referred to as their ‘microbiota’, that plays a central role in their well-being by promoting growth, health, and resilience (Gross, <span>2022</span>). Moreover, during pathogen attack, plants actively attract microbes into their microbiota from the surrounding environment that can mitigate disease either by directly antagonizing the pathogen, or through stimulation of plant immune responses (Teixeira <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>). In addition to host-plant genetics and environmental cues, intermicrobial interactions greatly influence microbiota compositions (Singh <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). In an article published in this issue of <i>New Phytologist</i>, Gómez-Pérez <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>, 2320–2334) describe the investigation of molecular mechanisms underlying intermicrobial interactions between a pathogenic oomycete and its host-plant microbiota (Gómez-Pérez <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Using a novel approach, the authors show that oomycete pathogens release proteins with selective antimicrobial activity to restructure host microbial communities to promote host colonization (Fig. 1).</p><p>Oomycetes are filamentous eukaryotes that belong to the Stramenopiles lineage and are closely related to diatoms and brown algae. Some of the most devastating plant and animal pathogens are oomycetes, and these organisms cause significant economic losses and represent major threats to global food security and ecosystem stability. As with plant-associated fungi, the symbiotic relationships between plants and pathogenic oomycetes have mostly been studied in binary interactions, involving oomycetes with particular plant hosts. These studies identify many oomycete effectors that target plant regulatory networks to facilitate host colonization (Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>). However, they ignore the host-associated microbiota. Such oomycete effectors fit the ‘traditional’ definition as pathogen-specific small, cysteine-rich proteins that are secreted <i>in planta</i> to suppress host immunity. However, this dogma has been challenged by findings that effectors are also secreted by mutualistic, endophytic, and even saprophytic fungi, suggesting that they are better described as molecules that are secreted by microbes to beneficially manipulate their direct environment (Snelders <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). Taken together with the intimate association between plants and their microbiota, and the importance of the microbiota for plant health, this broader definition of effectors has led to the hypothesis that pathogens have evolved to target host-associated microbiota, in addition to the endogenous immune system of the host, using effectors to facilitate disease establishment (Snelders <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>). Indeed, several fungal pathogens were recently shown to secrete effectors with antimicrobial activities that directly manipulate the microbiota of their hosts (Snelders <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>, <span>2021</span>, <span>2023</span>; Chavarro-Carrero <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>; Ökmen <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Whether this also applied to oomycete plant pathogens was unknown until now.</p><p>In an earlier study, the authors showed that the plant pathogenic oomycete <i>Albugo laibachii</i> is a keystone member of the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> phyllosphere microbiota that significantly affects epi- and endophytic bacterial colonization (Agler <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). However, how <i>Albugo</i> mechanistically affects phyllosphere microbiota compositions remained enigmatic. Based on analyses of environmental samples of wild <i>A. thaliana</i> throughout multiple years and locations, Gómez-Pérez and co-authors have now confirmed that this <i>Albugo</i> sp. is highly integrated in the phyllosphere microbiota, most particularly through negative associations. From this important conceptual observation, the authors continued to identify three <i>A. candida</i> proteins in the apoplast of infected plants that displayed selective antimicrobial activity as a means to target the <i>A. thaliana</i> phyllosphere microbiota by inhibiting microbes that determine community stability. This unequivocally demonstrates that oomycete plant pathogens manipulate host-associated microbiota through <i>in planta</i>-secreted antimicrobials (Fig. 1). Importantly, with this finding the authors show that microbiota manipulation is a general mechanism for niche establishment of plant pathogens across kingdoms.</p><p>Interestingly, despite their evolutionary distance, fungi and oomycetes display strikingly similar strategies in their interactions with plant hosts. For example, to prevent the release of immunogenic fragments from their cell walls by plant hydrolases, and the recognition of these molecules by plant receptor proteins, both oomycetes and fungi modify their cell wall components or secrete glycan-binding effector molecules (Rovenich <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). These effectors either form a protective layer on cell walls, inhibit host hydrolases, or sequester glycan fragments to prevent their recognition. Other types of effectors are released by oomycetes and fungi to interfere with conserved host immune components, including the disruption of reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis, ethylene signaling, and autophagy (Wilson & McDowell, <span>2022</span>). Considering that effectors which directly target the plant host, as well as the associated microbiota, exist in these distantly related organisms, and exert similar functions, the underlying mechanisms may have ancient evolutionary origins. Like fungi, oomycetes colonized microbe-rich aquatic and terrestrial habitats before land plants evolved. Hence, particular effectors with antimicrobial activity may have evolved from antimicrobial proteins that originally functioned in microbial competition before the appearance of land plants, and consequently the evolution of plant pathogenicity (Snelders <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). This has been suggested for the antifungal effector AMP3 of the soilborne pathogen <i>Verticillium dahliae</i>, which likely evolved from ancient antimicrobial proteins of terrestrial fungal ancestors (Snelders <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Obligate biotrophic pathogens are specialized to colonize relatively narrow host ranges. Consequently, these pathogens are likely to encounter a smaller diversity of microbes than facultative or broad host-range pathogens. Thus, specialized pathogens may have evolved antimicrobial effectors to specifically manipulate a limited number of microbes to promote niche establishment on their plant hosts. In this study, Gómez-Pérez <i>et al</i>. demonstrate that the three identified antimicrobials secreted by <i>A. candida</i> display selective antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria. This contrasts with earlier findings for two other narrow host-range pathogens, whose specialized lifestyles seem to be contradictory to the broad activity spectra of the antimicrobial effectors they secrete. The foliar pathogen <i>Zymoseptoria tritici</i> and the smut fungus <i>Ustilago maydis</i> secrete the active ribonucleases Zt6 and Ribo1, respectively, which display potent antimicrobial activity (Kettles <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>; Ökmen <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). One obvious distinction between the antimicrobial effectors of <i>Z. tritici</i> and <i>U. maydis</i>, and those of <i>A. candida</i>, are the different colonization stages during which they act. The infection cycles of all three pathogens begin on the plant-host surface (episphere), which is characterized by the presence of a complex microbiota. Subsequently, hyphae penetrate host tissue and colonize the endosphere. Such endosphere colonization typically requires specialization, enabling microbes to overcome adverse conditions in the plant episphere. Hence, endosphere microbial densities are typically lower. Thus, effectors with a broad activity spectrum, like Zt6 and Ribo1, may have evolved to target the large breadth of microbes in the highly competitive episphere, while proteins with highly selective antimicrobial activities, like those secreted by <i>A. candida</i>, may be required to manipulate specific, potentially antagonistic, microbes in the endosphere, and perhaps are the result of a long coevolutionary trajectory (Snelders <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>The <i>A. candida</i> antimicrobials display selective activity against five bacterial isolates of the <i>A. thaliana</i> core microbiota, one of which determines microbial community stability as shown by dropout experiments. Interestingly, growth of this strain is suppressed by one of the antimicrobial effectors <i>in planta</i>. Considering that <i>Albugo</i> infection results in a reduced alpha diversity of the <i>A. thaliana</i> phyllosphere community (Agler <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>), these results suggest that <i>A. candida</i> targets bacterial core taxa to cause dysbiosis.</p><p>Most of the antimicrobial proteins characterized to date are (predicted to be) small, cysteine-rich proteins with typical tight three-dimensional structures and recognized as toxin- or defensin-like folds. These criteria are often used in <i>in silico</i> pipelines to identify novel antimicrobials. In a novel approach, Gómez-Pérez <i>et al</i>. combined proteomics with antimicrobial activity prediction to identify antimicrobial protein candidates in apoplastic fluid isolated from <i>A. candida</i>-infected <i>A. thaliana</i>. To sidestep the limitation of protein size bias, which exists in most antimicrobial prediction tools, the authors used a weighted score resulting in candidates of 500 amino acids on average, which is considerably larger than ‘typical’ antimicrobials. Moreover, proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) were highly overrepresented. Such regions lack secondary or tertiary structures under physiological conditions, but can fold in a stimulus-dependent manner (Marin <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>). This structural flexibility may facilitate translocation, function, and evasion of recognition of bacterial effectors (Marin <i>et al</i>., <span>2013</span>) and could have similar advantages for fungal and oomycete antimicrobials. In humans, so-called cationic intrinsically disordered antimicrobial peptides (CIAMPs), which are defined as any linear peptide with a high percentage of disorder-promoting amino acids and a positive net charge, display potent microbicidal activity depending on environmental conditions (Latendorf <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>). Interestingly, the IDRs of the antimicrobials tested here were sufficient to inhibit bacterial growth <i>in vitro</i> and their activity positively correlated with their net charge. Thus, with their work, the authors provide new insights into structural characteristics of antimicrobial proteins that should be integrated into approaches for the identification of novel antimicrobial effectors, which are currently still heavily biased toward sequence and structural homology to ‘typical’ AMPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"239 6","pages":"2064-2066"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nph.19133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plants harbor a complex community of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes in their above- and belowground tissues, collectively referred to as their ‘microbiota’, that plays a central role in their well-being by promoting growth, health, and resilience (Gross, 2022). Moreover, during pathogen attack, plants actively attract microbes into their microbiota from the surrounding environment that can mitigate disease either by directly antagonizing the pathogen, or through stimulation of plant immune responses (Teixeira et al., 2019). In addition to host-plant genetics and environmental cues, intermicrobial interactions greatly influence microbiota compositions (Singh et al., 2023). In an article published in this issue of New Phytologist, Gómez-Pérez et al. (2023, 2320–2334) describe the investigation of molecular mechanisms underlying intermicrobial interactions between a pathogenic oomycete and its host-plant microbiota (Gómez-Pérez et al., 2023). Using a novel approach, the authors show that oomycete pathogens release proteins with selective antimicrobial activity to restructure host microbial communities to promote host colonization (Fig. 1).
Oomycetes are filamentous eukaryotes that belong to the Stramenopiles lineage and are closely related to diatoms and brown algae. Some of the most devastating plant and animal pathogens are oomycetes, and these organisms cause significant economic losses and represent major threats to global food security and ecosystem stability. As with plant-associated fungi, the symbiotic relationships between plants and pathogenic oomycetes have mostly been studied in binary interactions, involving oomycetes with particular plant hosts. These studies identify many oomycete effectors that target plant regulatory networks to facilitate host colonization (Wang et al., 2019). However, they ignore the host-associated microbiota. Such oomycete effectors fit the ‘traditional’ definition as pathogen-specific small, cysteine-rich proteins that are secreted in planta to suppress host immunity. However, this dogma has been challenged by findings that effectors are also secreted by mutualistic, endophytic, and even saprophytic fungi, suggesting that they are better described as molecules that are secreted by microbes to beneficially manipulate their direct environment (Snelders et al., 2022). Taken together with the intimate association between plants and their microbiota, and the importance of the microbiota for plant health, this broader definition of effectors has led to the hypothesis that pathogens have evolved to target host-associated microbiota, in addition to the endogenous immune system of the host, using effectors to facilitate disease establishment (Snelders et al., 2018). Indeed, several fungal pathogens were recently shown to secrete effectors with antimicrobial activities that directly manipulate the microbiota of their hosts (Snelders et al., 2020, 2021, 2023; Chavarro-Carrero et al., 2023; Ökmen et al., 2023). Whether this also applied to oomycete plant pathogens was unknown until now.
In an earlier study, the authors showed that the plant pathogenic oomycete Albugo laibachii is a keystone member of the Arabidopsis thaliana phyllosphere microbiota that significantly affects epi- and endophytic bacterial colonization (Agler et al., 2016). However, how Albugo mechanistically affects phyllosphere microbiota compositions remained enigmatic. Based on analyses of environmental samples of wild A. thaliana throughout multiple years and locations, Gómez-Pérez and co-authors have now confirmed that this Albugo sp. is highly integrated in the phyllosphere microbiota, most particularly through negative associations. From this important conceptual observation, the authors continued to identify three A. candida proteins in the apoplast of infected plants that displayed selective antimicrobial activity as a means to target the A. thaliana phyllosphere microbiota by inhibiting microbes that determine community stability. This unequivocally demonstrates that oomycete plant pathogens manipulate host-associated microbiota through in planta-secreted antimicrobials (Fig. 1). Importantly, with this finding the authors show that microbiota manipulation is a general mechanism for niche establishment of plant pathogens across kingdoms.
Interestingly, despite their evolutionary distance, fungi and oomycetes display strikingly similar strategies in their interactions with plant hosts. For example, to prevent the release of immunogenic fragments from their cell walls by plant hydrolases, and the recognition of these molecules by plant receptor proteins, both oomycetes and fungi modify their cell wall components or secrete glycan-binding effector molecules (Rovenich et al., 2016). These effectors either form a protective layer on cell walls, inhibit host hydrolases, or sequester glycan fragments to prevent their recognition. Other types of effectors are released by oomycetes and fungi to interfere with conserved host immune components, including the disruption of reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis, ethylene signaling, and autophagy (Wilson & McDowell, 2022). Considering that effectors which directly target the plant host, as well as the associated microbiota, exist in these distantly related organisms, and exert similar functions, the underlying mechanisms may have ancient evolutionary origins. Like fungi, oomycetes colonized microbe-rich aquatic and terrestrial habitats before land plants evolved. Hence, particular effectors with antimicrobial activity may have evolved from antimicrobial proteins that originally functioned in microbial competition before the appearance of land plants, and consequently the evolution of plant pathogenicity (Snelders et al., 2022). This has been suggested for the antifungal effector AMP3 of the soilborne pathogen Verticillium dahliae, which likely evolved from ancient antimicrobial proteins of terrestrial fungal ancestors (Snelders et al., 2021).
Obligate biotrophic pathogens are specialized to colonize relatively narrow host ranges. Consequently, these pathogens are likely to encounter a smaller diversity of microbes than facultative or broad host-range pathogens. Thus, specialized pathogens may have evolved antimicrobial effectors to specifically manipulate a limited number of microbes to promote niche establishment on their plant hosts. In this study, Gómez-Pérez et al. demonstrate that the three identified antimicrobials secreted by A. candida display selective antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria. This contrasts with earlier findings for two other narrow host-range pathogens, whose specialized lifestyles seem to be contradictory to the broad activity spectra of the antimicrobial effectors they secrete. The foliar pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici and the smut fungus Ustilago maydis secrete the active ribonucleases Zt6 and Ribo1, respectively, which display potent antimicrobial activity (Kettles et al., 2018; Ökmen et al., 2023). One obvious distinction between the antimicrobial effectors of Z. tritici and U. maydis, and those of A. candida, are the different colonization stages during which they act. The infection cycles of all three pathogens begin on the plant-host surface (episphere), which is characterized by the presence of a complex microbiota. Subsequently, hyphae penetrate host tissue and colonize the endosphere. Such endosphere colonization typically requires specialization, enabling microbes to overcome adverse conditions in the plant episphere. Hence, endosphere microbial densities are typically lower. Thus, effectors with a broad activity spectrum, like Zt6 and Ribo1, may have evolved to target the large breadth of microbes in the highly competitive episphere, while proteins with highly selective antimicrobial activities, like those secreted by A. candida, may be required to manipulate specific, potentially antagonistic, microbes in the endosphere, and perhaps are the result of a long coevolutionary trajectory (Snelders et al., 2022).
The A. candida antimicrobials display selective activity against five bacterial isolates of the A. thaliana core microbiota, one of which determines microbial community stability as shown by dropout experiments. Interestingly, growth of this strain is suppressed by one of the antimicrobial effectors in planta. Considering that Albugo infection results in a reduced alpha diversity of the A. thaliana phyllosphere community (Agler et al., 2016), these results suggest that A. candida targets bacterial core taxa to cause dysbiosis.
Most of the antimicrobial proteins characterized to date are (predicted to be) small, cysteine-rich proteins with typical tight three-dimensional structures and recognized as toxin- or defensin-like folds. These criteria are often used in in silico pipelines to identify novel antimicrobials. In a novel approach, Gómez-Pérez et al. combined proteomics with antimicrobial activity prediction to identify antimicrobial protein candidates in apoplastic fluid isolated from A. candida-infected A. thaliana. To sidestep the limitation of protein size bias, which exists in most antimicrobial prediction tools, the authors used a weighted score resulting in candidates of 500 amino acids on average, which is considerably larger than ‘typical’ antimicrobials. Moreover, proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) were highly overrepresented. Such regions lack secondary or tertiary structures under physiological conditions, but can fold in a stimulus-dependent manner (Marin et al., 2013). This structural flexibility may facilitate translocation, function, and evasion of recognition of bacterial effectors (Marin et al., 2013) and could have similar advantages for fungal and oomycete antimicrobials. In humans, so-called cationic intrinsically disordered antimicrobial peptides (CIAMPs), which are defined as any linear peptide with a high percentage of disorder-promoting amino acids and a positive net charge, display potent microbicidal activity depending on environmental conditions (Latendorf et al., 2019). Interestingly, the IDRs of the antimicrobials tested here were sufficient to inhibit bacterial growth in vitro and their activity positively correlated with their net charge. Thus, with their work, the authors provide new insights into structural characteristics of antimicrobial proteins that should be integrated into approaches for the identification of novel antimicrobial effectors, which are currently still heavily biased toward sequence and structural homology to ‘typical’ AMPs.
植物的地上和地下组织中有一个复杂的原核和真核微生物群落,统称为“微生物群”,通过促进生长、健康和恢复能力,在植物的福祉中起着核心作用(Gross, 2022)。此外,在病原体攻击期间,植物积极地从周围环境中吸引微生物进入其微生物群,这可以通过直接对抗病原体或通过刺激植物免疫反应来减轻疾病(Teixeira et al., 2019)。除了宿主-植物遗传和环境因素外,微生物间的相互作用极大地影响微生物群组成(Singh et al., 2023)。在这期《新植物学家》上发表的一篇文章中,Gómez-Pérez等人(2023,2320 - 2334)描述了病原卵菌与其宿主植物微生物群之间微生物间相互作用的分子机制研究(Gómez-Pérez等人,2023)。使用一种新颖的方法,作者表明卵菌病原体释放具有选择性抗菌活性的蛋白质,以重组宿主微生物群落,促进宿主定植(图1)。卵菌是丝状真核生物,属于层菌谱系,与硅藻和褐藻密切相关。一些最具破坏性的动植物病原体是卵菌,这些生物造成重大经济损失,并对全球粮食安全和生态系统稳定构成重大威胁。与植物相关真菌一样,植物和致病卵菌之间的共生关系主要是在二元相互作用中研究的,涉及卵菌与特定植物宿主的相互作用。这些研究确定了许多针对植物调控网络促进寄主定植的卵菌效应物(Wang et al., 2019)。然而,它们忽略了宿主相关的微生物群。这种卵菌效应物符合“传统”的定义,即植物中分泌的具有病原体特异性的富含半胱氨酸的小蛋白质,以抑制宿主免疫。然而,这一论断受到了一些发现的挑战,这些发现表明,效应物也可以由共生真菌、内生真菌甚至腐生真菌分泌,这表明,效应物更应该被描述为微生物分泌的分子,以有益地操纵其直接环境(Snelders et al., 2022)。考虑到植物与其微生物群之间的密切联系,以及微生物群对植物健康的重要性,这种更广泛的效应物定义导致了一种假设,即病原体已经进化到针对宿主相关的微生物群,除了宿主的内源性免疫系统外,还利用效应物促进疾病的建立(Snelders等人,2018)。事实上,一些真菌病原体最近被证明可以分泌具有抗菌活性的效应物,直接操纵宿主的微生物群(Snelders等人,2020年,2021年,2023年;Chavarro-Carrero et al., 2023;Ökmen et al., 2023)。这是否也适用于卵菌植物病原体目前尚不清楚。在较早的一项研究中,作者发现植物致病卵菌白垩白菌(Albugo laibachii)是拟南芥层球微生物群的关键成员,它显著影响外生和内生细菌的定植(Agler et al., 2016)。然而,白蛋白果如何机械地影响层球微生物群组成仍然是一个谜。基于对野生拟南芥在多年和多个地点的环境样本的分析,Gómez-Pérez和合作者现在已经证实,这种Albugo sp.在层圈微生物群中高度整合,尤其是通过负相关。根据这一重要的概念观察,作者继续在受感染植物的外质体中鉴定出三种假丝酵母菌蛋白,这些蛋白通过抑制决定群落稳定性的微生物来表现出选择性抗菌活性,从而靶向拟南芥叶层微生物群。这明确表明,卵菌植物病原体通过植物分泌的抗菌剂操纵宿主相关微生物群(图1)。重要的是,通过这一发现,作者表明微生物群操纵是跨王国植物病原体建立生态位的一般机制。有趣的是,尽管它们的进化距离较远,真菌和卵菌在与植物宿主的相互作用中表现出惊人的相似策略。例如,为了防止植物水解酶从细胞壁释放免疫原性片段,以及植物受体蛋白对这些分子的识别,卵菌和真菌都会修改其细胞壁成分或分泌聚糖结合效应分子(Rovenich et al., 2016)。这些效应物要么在细胞壁上形成保护层,抑制宿主水解酶,要么隔离聚糖片段以阻止它们被识别。 其他类型的效应器由卵菌和真菌释放,干扰宿主保守的免疫成分,包括破坏活性氧(ROS)稳态、乙烯信号传导和自噬(Wilson &麦克道尔,2022)。考虑到直接针对植物宿主以及相关微生物群的效应物存在于这些远亲生物中,并发挥相似的功能,其潜在机制可能具有古老的进化起源。像真菌一样,卵菌在陆地植物进化之前就在富含微生物的水生和陆地栖息地定居了。因此,具有抗菌活性的特定效应物可能是从在陆地植物出现之前最初在微生物竞争中发挥作用的抗菌蛋白进化而来的,从而进化出植物致病性(Snelders等,2022)。土传病原体大丽花黄萎病(Verticillium dahliae)的抗真菌效应物AMP3可能是由陆生真菌祖先的古老抗菌蛋白进化而来的(Snelders等人,2021)。专性生物营养病原体专门定植于相对狭窄的宿主范围。因此,与兼性或广泛宿主范围的病原体相比,这些病原体可能遇到的微生物多样性较小。因此,特定的病原体可能已经进化出抗菌效应物,以特异性地操纵有限数量的微生物,以促进在其植物宿主上建立生态位。在这项研究中,Gómez-Pérez等人证明假丝酵母菌分泌的三种已鉴定的抗菌素对革兰氏阳性菌具有选择性抗菌活性。这与先前对另外两种宿主范围较窄的病原体的发现形成对比,它们的特殊生活方式似乎与它们分泌的抗菌效应物的广泛活性谱相矛盾。叶面病原菌小麦酵母(Zymoseptoria tritici)和黑穗病菌(Ustilago maydis)分别分泌有活性的核糖核酸酶Zt6和Ribo1,显示出强大的抗菌活性(Kettles et al., 2018;Ökmen et al., 2023)。小麦弧菌和麦氏菌的抑菌效果剂与假丝酵母的抑菌效果剂之间的一个明显区别是它们起作用的定殖阶段不同。所有三种病原体的感染周期都始于植物-宿主表面(表皮),其特征是存在复杂的微生物群。随后,菌丝穿透宿主组织并定植于内球。这种内球定植通常需要专业化,使微生物能够克服植物外球的不利条件。因此,内球微生物密度通常较低。因此,具有广泛活性谱的效应物,如Zt6和Ribo1,可能已经进化到可以针对高度竞争的外球圈中的广泛微生物,而具有高度选择性抗菌活性的蛋白质,如假丝酵母分泌的蛋白质,可能需要操纵内球圈中特定的、潜在的拮抗微生物,这可能是长期共同进化轨迹的结果(Snelders等人,2022)。念珠菌抗菌剂对拟南芽孢杆菌核心菌群的5个分离菌具有选择性活性,其中一个决定了微生物群落的稳定性,如dropout实验所示。有趣的是,该菌株的生长受到植物中一种抗菌效应物的抑制。考虑到Albugo感染导致拟酵母菌层圈群落α多样性降低(Agler et al., 2016),这些结果表明假丝酵母菌以细菌核心分类群为目标导致生态失调。迄今为止鉴定的大多数抗菌蛋白都是(预计是)小的、富含半胱氨酸的蛋白质,具有典型的紧密三维结构,被认为是毒素或防御素样褶皱。这些标准通常用于硅管道中识别新型抗菌剂。Gómez-Pérez等人采用一种新方法,将蛋白质组学与抗菌活性预测相结合,从假丝酵母菌感染的拟南拟菌分离的胞外液中鉴定候选抗菌蛋白。为了避免大多数抗菌素预测工具中存在的蛋白质大小偏差的限制,作者使用加权评分,平均产生500个氨基酸的候选物,这比“典型”抗菌素大得多。此外,具有内在无序区(IDRs)的蛋白质被高度过度代表。这些区域在生理条件下缺乏二级或三级结构,但可以以刺激依赖的方式折叠(Marin et al., 2013)。这种结构灵活性可能有助于细菌效应物的易位、功能和逃避识别(Marin等人,2013),并且可能对真菌和卵霉菌抗菌剂具有类似的优势。 在人类中,所谓的阳离子内在无序抗菌肽(CIAMPs)被定义为任何具有高比例促进无序氨基酸和正电荷的线性肽,根据环境条件显示出强大的杀微生物活性(Latendorf et al., 2019)。有趣的是,这里测试的抗菌剂的idr足以抑制细菌的体外生长,其活性与其净电荷正相关。因此,通过他们的工作,作者对抗菌蛋白的结构特征提供了新的见解,这些特征应该被整合到鉴定新型抗菌效应物的方法中,这些方法目前仍然严重偏向于与“典型”抗菌蛋白的序列和结构同源性。
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.