What Findings Do Psychotherapy Researchers Use in Their Own Practice? A Survey of the Society for Psychotherapy Research

A. J. Ogilvie, I. Abreu, J. Safran
{"title":"What Findings Do Psychotherapy Researchers Use in Their Own Practice? A Survey of the Society for Psychotherapy Research","authors":"A. J. Ogilvie, I. Abreu, J. Safran","doi":"10.1037/e741582011-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decades, both clinical researchers and practitioners alike have noted the gap between psychotherapy research and practice. Previous research has found that a contributing factor to this gap is that psychotherapy research lacks ecological validity. Therefore, in an effort to distinguish research findings that do have an impact on clinical practice, the present study investigates the following primary question: what particular research findings do psychotherapy researchers, who are also clinical practitioners themselves, find to be useful within their own clinical practice? Since members of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR) are comprised of psychotherapy research-practitioners, they were asked to fill out a web-based Psychotherapy Research Questionnaire (PRQ) that would help answer this question.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"3 1","pages":"17-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741582011-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Over the past decades, both clinical researchers and practitioners alike have noted the gap between psychotherapy research and practice. Previous research has found that a contributing factor to this gap is that psychotherapy research lacks ecological validity. Therefore, in an effort to distinguish research findings that do have an impact on clinical practice, the present study investigates the following primary question: what particular research findings do psychotherapy researchers, who are also clinical practitioners themselves, find to be useful within their own clinical practice? Since members of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR) are comprised of psychotherapy research-practitioners, they were asked to fill out a web-based Psychotherapy Research Questionnaire (PRQ) that would help answer this question.
心理治疗研究人员在他们自己的实践中使用了什么发现?心理治疗研究协会的调查
在过去的几十年里,临床研究人员和从业人员都注意到心理治疗研究和实践之间的差距。先前的研究发现,造成这种差距的一个因素是心理治疗研究缺乏生态有效性。因此,为了区分对临床实践有影响的研究结果,本研究调查了以下主要问题:心理治疗研究人员(他们本身也是临床从业人员)发现哪些特定的研究结果在他们自己的临床实践中有用?由于心理治疗研究协会(SPR)的成员都是心理治疗研究的实践者,他们被要求填写一份基于网络的心理治疗研究问卷(PRQ)来帮助回答这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信