Thinking About Me, You, and Them: Understanding Higher- Order Propositional Attitudes

J. Vega
{"title":"Thinking About Me, You, and Them: Understanding Higher- Order Propositional Attitudes","authors":"J. Vega","doi":"10.1037/e741552011-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher-order propositional attitudes (HOPAs), such as \"I think that you think that...,\" figure in many fields including theory of mind, cognitive ethology, and psycholinguistics. Analysis of many examples suggests there may be differences in understandability of HOPAs depending on the type and number of constituents and the presence of recursions. Empirical work on normal adult ability with HOPAs has been lacking, leaving research with special populations without a standard for comparison. An exper- iment explored the effects of varying the number of individuals in HOPA sentences, up to the eighth order. Significant differences in understandability of HOPA sentences were found between three groups, those that are about (i) oneself, (ii) dyads, and (iii) series of different individuals.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"5 1","pages":"75-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741552011-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Higher-order propositional attitudes (HOPAs), such as "I think that you think that...," figure in many fields including theory of mind, cognitive ethology, and psycholinguistics. Analysis of many examples suggests there may be differences in understandability of HOPAs depending on the type and number of constituents and the presence of recursions. Empirical work on normal adult ability with HOPAs has been lacking, leaving research with special populations without a standard for comparison. An exper- iment explored the effects of varying the number of individuals in HOPA sentences, up to the eighth order. Significant differences in understandability of HOPA sentences were found between three groups, those that are about (i) oneself, (ii) dyads, and (iii) series of different individuals.
思考我、你和他们:理解更高阶的命题态度
高阶命题态度(HOPAs),如“我认为你认为……”在许多领域,包括心理理论、认知行为学和心理语言学中都占有一席之地。对许多例子的分析表明,hopa的可理解性可能存在差异,这取决于成分的类型和数量以及递归的存在。关于hopa的正常成人能力的实证研究一直缺乏,这使得对特殊人群的研究没有一个比较的标准。一项实验探索了改变HOPA句子中个体数量的影响,直到第八阶。不同个体的(i)自我、(ii)双、(iii)系列HOPA句子的可理解性在三组之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信