Detection of Negative Emotions in Autistics: Questioning the ‘Amygdala Hypothesis’

N. Khetrapal
{"title":"Detection of Negative Emotions in Autistics: Questioning the ‘Amygdala Hypothesis’","authors":"N. Khetrapal","doi":"10.1037/e741502011-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome (AS) are neurodevelopmental conditions that are marked by social and communica- tion problems that involve difficulties with facial emotional processing, as well as restricted interests and behaviors. There have been conflicting reports in the literature regarding the perception of basic emotional expressions with some studies showing differences between the autistics and normal participants while others show no such differences. There have also been some reports of deficits in the processing of basic negative emotions in autism like fear, sad- ness and anger. These deficits shown by autistics are comparable to deficits shown by people with amygdala damage. These comparable deficits have led to the formulation of the ‘amygdala theory in autism’. However, a strong form of the amygdala hypothesis in autism still requires experimental evidence of distinctions between ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ awareness of negative emotional stimuli. In some studies the activation in the amygdala is found when participants are subjectively unaware of the fearful faces but not when they are objectively unaware. Previous studies that have been conducted to investigate the facial emotion recognition deficits in autism in order to support the amygdala hy- pothesis have relied on the percentage correct values of the autistic subjects, which are known to be highly sensitive to response bias. Performance when evaluated according to standard signal detection methods provides a measure of sensitivity that is independent of a subject’s response bias. Only the latter methodology can provide a stringent test of the amygdala hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"5 1","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741502011-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome (AS) are neurodevelopmental conditions that are marked by social and communica- tion problems that involve difficulties with facial emotional processing, as well as restricted interests and behaviors. There have been conflicting reports in the literature regarding the perception of basic emotional expressions with some studies showing differences between the autistics and normal participants while others show no such differences. There have also been some reports of deficits in the processing of basic negative emotions in autism like fear, sad- ness and anger. These deficits shown by autistics are comparable to deficits shown by people with amygdala damage. These comparable deficits have led to the formulation of the ‘amygdala theory in autism’. However, a strong form of the amygdala hypothesis in autism still requires experimental evidence of distinctions between ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ awareness of negative emotional stimuli. In some studies the activation in the amygdala is found when participants are subjectively unaware of the fearful faces but not when they are objectively unaware. Previous studies that have been conducted to investigate the facial emotion recognition deficits in autism in order to support the amygdala hy- pothesis have relied on the percentage correct values of the autistic subjects, which are known to be highly sensitive to response bias. Performance when evaluated according to standard signal detection methods provides a measure of sensitivity that is independent of a subject’s response bias. Only the latter methodology can provide a stringent test of the amygdala hypothesis.
自闭症患者消极情绪的检测:对“杏仁核假说”的质疑
自闭症和阿斯伯格综合症(AS)是一种神经发育疾病,其特征是社交和沟通问题,包括面部情绪处理困难,以及兴趣和行为受限。关于基本情绪表达的感知,文献中有相互矛盾的报道,一些研究显示自闭症患者和正常参与者之间存在差异,而另一些研究则没有这种差异。也有一些报道称,自闭症患者在处理基本负面情绪(如恐惧、悲伤和愤怒)方面存在缺陷。自闭症患者表现出的这些缺陷与杏仁核受损的人表现出的缺陷相当。这些可比的缺陷导致了“自闭症杏仁核理论”的形成。然而,自闭症杏仁核假说的强有力形式仍然需要实验证据来证明消极情绪刺激的“主观”和“客观”意识之间的区别。在一些研究中发现,当参与者主观上没有意识到恐惧的面孔时,杏仁核会被激活,但当他们客观上没有意识到恐惧的面孔时,杏仁核就不会被激活。为了支持杏仁核假说,之前对自闭症患者面部情绪识别缺陷的研究都依赖于自闭症患者的正确率,而自闭症患者对反应偏差非常敏感。当根据标准信号检测方法评估性能时,提供了一种独立于受试者反应偏差的灵敏度测量。只有后一种方法才能对杏仁核假说提供严格的检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信