Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem service bundles in an alpine mountainous region: A case- study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yanmin Teng, Jinyan Zhan, Wei Liu, Xi Chu, Fan Zhang, Chao Wang, Lanyuan Wang
{"title":"Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem service bundles in an alpine mountainous region: A case- study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China","authors":"Yanmin Teng,&nbsp;Jinyan Zhan,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Xi Chu,&nbsp;Fan Zhang,&nbsp;Chao Wang,&nbsp;Lanyuan Wang","doi":"10.1002/ldr.4266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In mountainous areas with diverse climate, topography, and socio-economic status, ecosystem services (ES) trade-offs may differ largely in space. However, few researches have spatially identified the trade-offs and influencing factors of ES in different regions. We selected the Qilian Mountains (QLM) as a study area and eight key ES [grain production (GP), livestock production (LP), water yield (WY), carbon sequestration (CS), water erosion prevention (WAEC), wind erosion prevention (WIEC), habitat quality (HQ), and sightseeing (SS)] were evaluated through spatially explicit models. K-means clustering was used to identify the ES bundles. Trade-offs between ES were identified using factor analysis. Natural and human drivers that influence the spatial differentiation of ES were explored through redundancy analysis. The results showed the eight ES had obvious spatial heterogeneity and could be clustered into three bundles. In the entire QLM, there were obvious synergies between most ES, especially GP, LP, CS, and SS. However, several trade-offs existed in different bundles (e.g., HQ with GP, LP, CS, and SS in bundle 1; HQ with GP, LP, and SS in bundle 2; WIEC with WY and WAEC in bundle 3). Natural factors were the main factors affecting the spatial differentiation of ES, among which vegetation coverage, elevation, precipitation, and slope have higher explanatory degrees, but differences among three bundles were great. The influence of human factors on the provisioning and cultural services was relatively high in local areas. This study can provide references for formulating regional development strategies in the QLM and other mountainous regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"33 11","pages":"1846-1861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.4266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In mountainous areas with diverse climate, topography, and socio-economic status, ecosystem services (ES) trade-offs may differ largely in space. However, few researches have spatially identified the trade-offs and influencing factors of ES in different regions. We selected the Qilian Mountains (QLM) as a study area and eight key ES [grain production (GP), livestock production (LP), water yield (WY), carbon sequestration (CS), water erosion prevention (WAEC), wind erosion prevention (WIEC), habitat quality (HQ), and sightseeing (SS)] were evaluated through spatially explicit models. K-means clustering was used to identify the ES bundles. Trade-offs between ES were identified using factor analysis. Natural and human drivers that influence the spatial differentiation of ES were explored through redundancy analysis. The results showed the eight ES had obvious spatial heterogeneity and could be clustered into three bundles. In the entire QLM, there were obvious synergies between most ES, especially GP, LP, CS, and SS. However, several trade-offs existed in different bundles (e.g., HQ with GP, LP, CS, and SS in bundle 1; HQ with GP, LP, and SS in bundle 2; WIEC with WY and WAEC in bundle 3). Natural factors were the main factors affecting the spatial differentiation of ES, among which vegetation coverage, elevation, precipitation, and slope have higher explanatory degrees, but differences among three bundles were great. The influence of human factors on the provisioning and cultural services was relatively high in local areas. This study can provide references for formulating regional development strategies in the QLM and other mountainous regions.

高寒山区生态系统服务包权衡的空间异质性——以祁连山为例
在具有不同气候、地形和社会经济状况的山区,生态系统服务(ES)的权衡在空间上可能存在很大差异。然而,很少有研究从空间上识别不同地区生态系统的权衡及其影响因素。以祁连山为研究区,通过空间显式模型对8个关键ES[粮食生产(GP)、畜牧生产(LP)、产水量(WY)、固碳(CS)、水土流失(WAEC)、风蚀防治(WIEC)、生境质量(HQ)和观光(SS)]进行了评价。采用K-means聚类方法对ES束进行识别。使用因子分析确定ES之间的权衡。通过冗余分析,探讨了影响生态系统空间分异的自然和人为驱动因素。结果表明,8种ES具有明显的空间异质性,可聚为3束。在整个QLM中,大多数ES之间存在明显的协同效应,尤其是GP、LP、CS和SS。然而,不同bundle中存在一些权衡(例如,HQ与GP、LP、CS和SS在bundle 1中;HQ与GP, LP和SS在捆绑包2;自然因子是影响ES空间分异的主要因子,其中植被覆盖度、高程、降水和坡度的解释程度较高,但3束间差异较大。局部地区人为因素对供给和文化服务的影响较大。本研究可为昆仑山及其他山区制定区域发展战略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书