Rina S. Fox PhD, MPH, Grace E. Armstrong MA, Julia S. Gaumond BA, Taylor F. D. Vigoureux PhD, Corinne H. Miller MLIS, Stacy D. Sanford PhD, John M. Salsman PhD, Emmanuel Katsanis MD, Terry A. Badger PhD, Damon R. Reed MD, Brian D. Gonzalez PhD, Heather S. L. Jim PhD, Echo L. Warner PhD, MPH, David E. Victorson PhD, Laura B. Oswald PhD
{"title":"Social isolation and social connectedness among young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review","authors":"Rina S. Fox PhD, MPH, Grace E. Armstrong MA, Julia S. Gaumond BA, Taylor F. D. Vigoureux PhD, Corinne H. Miller MLIS, Stacy D. Sanford PhD, John M. Salsman PhD, Emmanuel Katsanis MD, Terry A. Badger PhD, Damon R. Reed MD, Brian D. Gonzalez PhD, Heather S. L. Jim PhD, Echo L. Warner PhD, MPH, David E. Victorson PhD, Laura B. Oswald PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.34934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Social isolation and connectedness are social determinants of health that have demonstrated effects on cancer-related outcomes. These constructs have been systematically evaluated among pediatric and older adult cancer populations. In this review, the authors evaluated the prevalence, correlates, and psychosocial implications of social isolation and connectedness among young adult (YA) cancer survivors aged 18–39 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Peer-reviewed articles published in English before June 2021 were identified from database searches and included articles' reference lists according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included articles described studies that assessed social isolation and/or connectedness among YA cancer survivors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 5094 unique records were identified; 4143 were excluded after title/abstract screening, and 907 were excluded after full-text review. Forty-four articles were included. Few studies used validated measures or directly assessed social isolation or connectedness. Social isolation was similarly prevalent among YAs and older cancer survivors and noncancer populations. Demographic, clinical, and behavioral risk and protective factors for social isolation were identified. Social isolation was related to worse psychological well-being, whereas social connectedness was often, but not always, related to better psychological well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This growing literature underscores the relevance of social isolation and connectedness as important health determinants among YA cancer survivors. The identified risk and protective factors can identify YAs who especially may benefit from screening for social isolation. Future studies are needed that directly, reliably, and validly evaluate social isolation and connectedness to inform the development of interventions to decrease isolation and increase connectedness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"129 19","pages":"2946-2965"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.34934","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.34934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background
Social isolation and connectedness are social determinants of health that have demonstrated effects on cancer-related outcomes. These constructs have been systematically evaluated among pediatric and older adult cancer populations. In this review, the authors evaluated the prevalence, correlates, and psychosocial implications of social isolation and connectedness among young adult (YA) cancer survivors aged 18–39 years.
Methods
Peer-reviewed articles published in English before June 2021 were identified from database searches and included articles' reference lists according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included articles described studies that assessed social isolation and/or connectedness among YA cancer survivors.
Results
In total, 5094 unique records were identified; 4143 were excluded after title/abstract screening, and 907 were excluded after full-text review. Forty-four articles were included. Few studies used validated measures or directly assessed social isolation or connectedness. Social isolation was similarly prevalent among YAs and older cancer survivors and noncancer populations. Demographic, clinical, and behavioral risk and protective factors for social isolation were identified. Social isolation was related to worse psychological well-being, whereas social connectedness was often, but not always, related to better psychological well-being.
Conclusions
This growing literature underscores the relevance of social isolation and connectedness as important health determinants among YA cancer survivors. The identified risk and protective factors can identify YAs who especially may benefit from screening for social isolation. Future studies are needed that directly, reliably, and validly evaluate social isolation and connectedness to inform the development of interventions to decrease isolation and increase connectedness.
社会孤立和联系是健康的社会决定因素,已证明对癌症相关结果有影响。这些结构已经在儿童和老年癌症人群中进行了系统的评估。在这篇综述中,作者评估了18-39岁的年轻成人(YA)癌症幸存者中社会隔离和联系的患病率、相关性以及社会心理影响。方法根据PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)指南,从数据库检索中找到2021年6月前发表的同行评议的英文文章,并纳入文章的参考文献列表。纳入的文章描述了评估YA癌症幸存者的社会孤立和/或联系的研究。结果共识别出5094条唯一记录;标题/摘要筛选后排除4143例,全文审查后排除907例。共纳入44篇文章。很少有研究使用有效的措施或直接评估社会隔离或联系。社会孤立在青少年、老年癌症幸存者和非癌症人群中同样普遍。确定了社会隔离的人口统计学、临床和行为风险和保护因素。社会孤立与较差的心理健康有关,而社会联系通常(但并非总是)与较好的心理健康有关。越来越多的文献强调了社会孤立和联系作为YA癌症幸存者重要的健康决定因素的相关性。确定的风险和保护因素可以确定哪些青少年特别可能从社会隔离筛查中受益。未来的研究需要直接、可靠和有效地评估社会隔离和连通性,以告知干预措施的发展,以减少隔离和增加连通性。
期刊介绍:
The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society.
CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research