Anne-Ditte Termannsen, Annemarie Varming, Christina van Elst, Natasja Bjerre, Ole N?rgaard, Nana Folmann Hempler, Kristine F?rch, Jonas Salling Quist
{"title":"Feasibility of time-restricted eating in individuals with overweight, obesity, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes: A systematic scoping review","authors":"Anne-Ditte Termannsen, Annemarie Varming, Christina van Elst, Natasja Bjerre, Ole N?rgaard, Nana Folmann Hempler, Kristine F?rch, Jonas Salling Quist","doi":"10.1002/oby.23743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic scoping review aimed to map and synthesize research on feasibility of time-restricted eating (TRE) in individuals with overweight, obesity, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes, including recruitment rate, retention rate, safety, adherence, and participants' attitudes, experiences, and perspectives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to November 22, 2022, supplemented by backward and forward citation search.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 4219 identified records, 28 studies were included. In general, recruitment was easy and median retention rate was 95% among studies with <12 weeks duration and 89% among studies ≥12 weeks. Median (range) adherence to the target eating window for studies <12 and ≥12 weeks was 89% (75%–98%) and 81% (47%–93%), respectively. Variation in adherence among participants and studies was considerable, indicating that following TRE was difficult for some people and that intervention conditions influenced adherence. These findings were supported by qualitative data synthetized from seven studies, and determinants of adherence included calorie-free beverages outside the eating window, provision of support, and influence on the eating window. No serious adverse events were reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>TRE is implementable, acceptable, and safe in populations with overweight, obesity, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes, but it should be accompanied by support and options for individual adjustments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"31 6","pages":"1463-1485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.23743","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective
This systematic scoping review aimed to map and synthesize research on feasibility of time-restricted eating (TRE) in individuals with overweight, obesity, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes, including recruitment rate, retention rate, safety, adherence, and participants' attitudes, experiences, and perspectives.
Methods
The authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to November 22, 2022, supplemented by backward and forward citation search.
Results
From 4219 identified records, 28 studies were included. In general, recruitment was easy and median retention rate was 95% among studies with <12 weeks duration and 89% among studies ≥12 weeks. Median (range) adherence to the target eating window for studies <12 and ≥12 weeks was 89% (75%–98%) and 81% (47%–93%), respectively. Variation in adherence among participants and studies was considerable, indicating that following TRE was difficult for some people and that intervention conditions influenced adherence. These findings were supported by qualitative data synthetized from seven studies, and determinants of adherence included calorie-free beverages outside the eating window, provision of support, and influence on the eating window. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions
TRE is implementable, acceptable, and safe in populations with overweight, obesity, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes, but it should be accompanied by support and options for individual adjustments.
目的:本系统综述旨在对超重、肥胖、前驱糖尿病或2型糖尿病患者进行限时饮食(TRE)的可行性研究进行综述和综合,包括招募率、保留率、安全性、依从性以及参与者的态度、经历和观点。方法检索MEDLINE、Embase、Nursing and Allied Health Literature Cumulative Index,检索时间为建站至2022年11月22日,并辅以前后引文检索。结果从4219份确定的记录中,纳入了28项研究。总的来说,招募很容易,在持续时间为12周的研究中,中位留任率为95%,在持续时间≥12周的研究中,中位留任率为89%。在12周和≥12周的研究中,对目标进食窗口的依从性中位数(范围)分别为89%(75%-98%)和81%(47%-93%)。参与者和研究之间的依从性差异很大,这表明一些人很难遵循TRE,干预条件影响了依从性。这些发现得到了七项研究综合的定性数据的支持,坚持的决定因素包括进食窗口外的无卡路里饮料、提供支持和对进食窗口的影响。无严重不良事件报告。结论:TRE在超重、肥胖、糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病人群中是可实施的、可接受的和安全的,但它应该伴随着个人调整的支持和选择。
期刊介绍:
Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.