Islamic Political Identity in Turkey, by M. Hakan Yavuz. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 328 pages, endnotes, bibliography, index. US$65.00 (Cloth) ISBN 0-19-516085-1

E. A. Aytekin
{"title":"Islamic Political Identity in Turkey, by M. Hakan Yavuz. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 328 pages, endnotes, bibliography, index. US$65.00 (Cloth) ISBN 0-19-516085-1","authors":"E. A. Aytekin","doi":"10.1017/S0026318400050021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main criticisms of Quranic Studies when it first came out, was how it was inaccessible even to the specialist. As a way of ameliorating this difficulty, in this new edition, Rippin has included expanded notes or annotations to help ease the reading and comprehension of this book. Unfortunately, instead of elucidating the meaning of the context of the text page by page these expanded notes are merely translations of Qur'anic, Arabic, Hebrew and German quotations used by Warnsbrough in his original text. The plus side to this disappointment would probably be the inclusion of a glossary of technical terms used by Warnsbrough. The inclusion of these terms is useful as they are given brief explanations by Rippin as to their meaning suitable for the context in which they are used. I would have wished that an index with the page numbers of these terms be included. This would make comprehending the work easier, instead of having to flip to the end of the book for the glossary. Although Warnsbrough had included an index of technical terms, it is unfortunately incomplete as words found in the glossary are not found there, e.g. heilsgeschichte, homoioteleuton, inconcinnity etc. In addition to these Rippin has also included a three page description of the manuscripts used by John Warnsbrough in writing Quranic Studies. In the foreword Rippin mentions how Warnsbrough's work and conclusions are used in polemical debates on internet sites \"by both Muslims and Christians\" (pp. xviii-xix). I would agree partially with Rippin on this point as Warnsbrough's conclusions are used more in websites questioning Islam and the Muslim faith rather than others. One wonders about whether or not republishing this book will decrease such polemics, as Rippin remarked at the end of his foreword (p. xix), especially when the publisher is known to have published many controversial and provocative books consisting of compilations of articles written by sceptical scholars. Although the work has been made less difficult and the degree of accessibility is increased, due to the terse and difficult tools employed here, this book will still be appealing only to a small audience of specialist scholars. Mohamad Nasrin International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization","PeriodicalId":88595,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Studies Association bulletin","volume":"40 1","pages":"251 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0026318400050021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Studies Association bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400050021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main criticisms of Quranic Studies when it first came out, was how it was inaccessible even to the specialist. As a way of ameliorating this difficulty, in this new edition, Rippin has included expanded notes or annotations to help ease the reading and comprehension of this book. Unfortunately, instead of elucidating the meaning of the context of the text page by page these expanded notes are merely translations of Qur'anic, Arabic, Hebrew and German quotations used by Warnsbrough in his original text. The plus side to this disappointment would probably be the inclusion of a glossary of technical terms used by Warnsbrough. The inclusion of these terms is useful as they are given brief explanations by Rippin as to their meaning suitable for the context in which they are used. I would have wished that an index with the page numbers of these terms be included. This would make comprehending the work easier, instead of having to flip to the end of the book for the glossary. Although Warnsbrough had included an index of technical terms, it is unfortunately incomplete as words found in the glossary are not found there, e.g. heilsgeschichte, homoioteleuton, inconcinnity etc. In addition to these Rippin has also included a three page description of the manuscripts used by John Warnsbrough in writing Quranic Studies. In the foreword Rippin mentions how Warnsbrough's work and conclusions are used in polemical debates on internet sites "by both Muslims and Christians" (pp. xviii-xix). I would agree partially with Rippin on this point as Warnsbrough's conclusions are used more in websites questioning Islam and the Muslim faith rather than others. One wonders about whether or not republishing this book will decrease such polemics, as Rippin remarked at the end of his foreword (p. xix), especially when the publisher is known to have published many controversial and provocative books consisting of compilations of articles written by sceptical scholars. Although the work has been made less difficult and the degree of accessibility is increased, due to the terse and difficult tools employed here, this book will still be appealing only to a small audience of specialist scholars. Mohamad Nasrin International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization
哈坎·亚武兹著,《土耳其的伊斯兰政治认同》。纽约:牛津大学出版社,2003。328页,尾注,参考书目,索引。US$65.00(布)ISBN 0-19-516085-1
《古兰经研究》最初问世时,人们对它的主要批评之一是,即使是专家也无法理解它。作为一种改善这种困难的方法,在这个新版本中,里平已经包括了扩展的笔记或注释,以帮助简化这本书的阅读和理解。不幸的是,这些扩展的注释并没有一页一页地解释文本上下文的意思,只是翻译了Warnsbrough在原文中使用的古兰经,阿拉伯语,希伯来语和德语引文。这种失望的好处可能是包含了沃恩斯堡使用的技术术语表。这些术语的包含是有用的,因为Rippin对它们的含义进行了简短的解释,以适合使用它们的上下文。我希望有一个索引,其中包括这些术语的页码。这将使理解工作更容易,而不是必须翻到书的最后寻找术语表。虽然Warnsbrough收录了一个专业术语索引,但不幸的是,它是不完整的,因为在术语表中找不到单词,例如heilsgeschichte, homoioteleuton, inconcnity等。除了这些,里平还包括了约翰·沃恩斯布罗在撰写《古兰经研究》时使用的三页手稿的描述。在前言中,里平提到沃恩斯堡的工作和结论如何被“穆斯林和基督徒”在互联网网站上的辩论中使用(第18 - 19页)。在这一点上,我部分同意Rippin的观点,因为Warnsbrough的结论更多地用于质疑伊斯兰教和穆斯林信仰的网站,而不是其他人。人们想知道,重新出版这本书是否会减少这样的争论,正如里平在前言最后所说的那样(第19页),特别是当出版商出版了许多有争议和挑衅性的书,这些书是由持怀疑态度的学者所写的文章汇编而成的。尽管本书的难度降低了,易于理解的程度也提高了,但由于本书使用了简洁而困难的工具,本书仍然只对少数专业学者有吸引力。穆罕默德·纳斯林国际伊斯兰思想与文明研究所
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信