THE DESCENDANTS OF PETRARCH'S PRO ARCHIA*

IF 0.2 3区历史学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2013-04-24 DOI:10.1017/S0009838812000596

J. De Keyser

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Editors of Cicero's Pro Archia have assumed that Petrarch's lost transcription of the equally lost Liège manuscript that he discovered in 1333 survives in an almost unaltered version in a single Florentine manuscript, while the remaining 265 Itali reflect another stage of the text, when conjectural corrections by its learned discoverer were introduced into the text. This article proposes a reassessment of that dichotomy, based on a first comprehensive study of the whole transmission.

查看原文本刊更多论文

彼特拉克的亲archia *的后代

西塞罗的《阿奇亚书》的编辑们认为，彼得拉克在1333年发现的同样丢失的利奥尔奇手稿的抄本，以一份几乎未经修改的佛罗伦萨手稿保存了下来，而剩下的265份意大利文反映了文本的另一个阶段，当时它的有知识的发现者将推测性的更正引入了文本。本文基于对整个传播的首次全面研究，提出了对这种二分法的重新评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Classical Quarterly has a reputation for publishing the highest quality classical scholarship for nearly 100 years. It publishes research papers and short notes in the fields of language, literature, history and philosophy. Two substantial issues (around 300 pages each) of The Classical Quarterly appear each year, in May and December. Given the quality and depth of the articles published in The Classical Quarterly, any serious classical library needs to have a copy on its shelves. Published for the The Classical Association